OMG!! VITESSE MOTORSPORTS THROTTLE CONTROLLER WOW!! - Page 9 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

horizon670 · 09-29-2014, 10:16 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

You have not addressed anything I said. If what I said was open for argument or easily refutable you would be easily able to post facts and tear down my argument. The fact that you cannot refute what I said says everything.

So I'll ask the questions you do not want to answer since you want to play it that way.

What does your device do to the signal being sent out of the pedal sensor to the ECM? How does it modify that signal?

Does your device reduce the amount of time the ECM takes to send a signal to the throttle body sensor?

Does your device reduce the amount of time it takes for the pedal sensor to send a signal to the ECM?

I already know the answers but this should make it more clear to your buyers on what this booster actually does.

My answers to your questions:

Yes, the Signal sent out from the Gas pedal is different than stock, that's the magic formula !

Yes, our Controller reduces the time it takes the ECU to send the signal to the Throttle body sensor.

I will not reveal more details. Why ? For obvious reasons. Tuners also don't want you to be able to copy or use their Tune for their own reasons.

Obviously, you never tried any of the Throttle Controllers and that is why you are so skeptical about this kind of Controllers.

I respect your opinion and I just want you to respect over 100 buyers opinion about our product.

DarkneSS · 09-29-2014, 10:27 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horizon670

My answers to your questions:

Yes, the Signal sent out from the Gas pedal is different than stock, that's the magic formula !

Yes, our Controller reduces the time it takes the ECU to send the signal to the Throttle body sensor.

I will not reveal more details. Why ? For obvious reasons. Tuners also don't want you to be able to copy or use their Tune for their own reasons.

Obviously, you never tried any of the Throttle Controllers and that is why you are so skeptical about this kind of Controllers.

I respect your opinion and I just want you to respect over 100 buyers opinion about our product.

The signal sent out from the gas pedal is a binary signal, like 01010110101011010, it could only be made stronger not "different." The ECM will only accept one type of signal from the pedal sensor.

"Yes, our Controller reduces the time it takes the ECU to send the signal to the Throttle body sensor."

No it does not because the only way to do that is to modify the ECM, your device only alters the pedal sensor signal.

Show me graphed data of the ECM to TPS with your product installed and not installed to back up this ridiculous assertion.

kjkjr27 · 09-29-2014, 10:28 PM

So anyways............

Quote:

Originally Posted by layzurguy

Don't see any numbers down the track.

I believe those might be in the other thread in the vendor section

GretchenGotGrowl · 09-29-2014, 10:29 PM

Has anyone logged commanded Throttle Position vs Actual Throttle Position before install and with various settings? Seems to me that would tell you if the throttle is being more responsive or not.

camguynj · 09-29-2014, 10:38 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horizon670

Yours was shipped this morning.

When do you anticipate more to be available as the website still says Out of Stock ?

horizon670 · 09-29-2014, 10:42 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by camguynj

When do you anticipate more to be available as the website still says Out of Stock ?

As soon as we receive the GM / Delphi harness that we use.
We're expecting them in about a week or so.

lownslowss · 09-29-2014, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

The signal sent out from the gas pedal is a binary signal, like 01010110101011010, it could only be made stronger not "different." The ECM will only accept one type of signal from the pedal sensor.

"Yes, our Controller reduces the time it takes the ECU to send the signal to the Throttle body sensor."

No it does not because the only way to do that is to modify the ECM, your device only alters the pedal sensor signal.

Show me graphed data of the ECM to TPS with your product installed and not installed to back up this ridiculous assertion.

When you're done ranting and can move on with your life, come on over and I'll do my best to get you laid...... But this I think, would be impossible. Because I would be acting as at "throttle controller" to get you to the P@$$ faster, and my signals wouldn't get to the girl faster and we'd all just be sol even though I've helped several people with this problem with rave reviews and they all got just what they wanted and expected except for you..... the guy that doesn't know when to just keep his mouth shut.

camguynj · 09-29-2014, 10:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by horizon670

As soon as we receive the GM / Delphi harness that we use.
We're expecting them in about a week or so.

sappy · 09-29-2014, 10:54 PM

My brain exploded.

spyderbuddy · 09-29-2014, 10:56 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

The signal sent out from the gas pedal is a binary signal, like 01010110101011010, it could only be made stronger not "different." The ECM will only accept one type of signal from the pedal sensor.

"Yes, our Controller reduces the time it takes the ECU to send the signal to the Throttle body sensor."

No it does not because the only way to do that is to modify the ECM, your device only alters the pedal sensor signal.

Show me graphed data of the ECM to TPS with your product installed and not installed to back up this ridiculous assertion.

I personally think this guy is upset because he either didn't get one, or think of it first.

Either way he should just leave.

spyderbuddy · 09-29-2014, 10:57 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl

Has anyone logged commanded Throttle Position vs Actual Throttle Position before install and with various settings? Seems to me that would tell you if the throttle is being more responsive or not.

Yes its in another thread.

hammdo · 09-29-2014, 10:58 PM

Here is a review on Camaro5 with some details:

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...02&postcount=1

spyderbuddy · 09-29-2014, 11:00 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hammdo

Here is a review on Camaro5 with some details:

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...02&postcount=1

Help that's it

rtcat600man · 09-30-2014, 04:55 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by layzurguy

Don't see any numbers down the track.

Most just got this last week. A few of us plan to hit the track, however we have other obligations in life too.

For me it looks like Oct. 26th will be my first chance at the local track.

If I have time I will try some 0-60 runs with my Beltronics GX2 Accelerometer.

Until then, carry-on.

09-29-2014, 10:29 PM	#116
GretchenGotGrowl Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Little Rock, AR Posts: 7,129 View My Garage	Has anyone logged commanded Throttle Position vs Actual Throttle Position before install and with various settings? Seems to me that would tell you if the throttle is being more responsive or not. __________________ New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread

09-29-2014, 10:54 PM	#121
sappy Drives: white 2011 1lt Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: warren pa Posts: 180	My brain exploded. __________________ Roto-Fab cai - rx ported throttle body - rx catch can - black iceolator - bmr strut bar/ drops springs - IPF tune - BBK long headers/ HF cats - res x-pipe - MRT V1 - (to much cosmetic to list)

09-29-2014, 10:58 PM	#124
hammdo 'It's an experiment' Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE Join Date: May 2014 Location: Dallas TX Posts: 8,694 View My Garage	Here is a review on Camaro5 with some details: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showpo...02&postcount=1