Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 03-12-2021, 09:24 AM   #1
Brad7294
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Greensburg,PA.
Posts: 151
Whipple 3.25 or 3.00 pulley upgrade

Read a few forums about this but was not covered completely. I am going to get a 10-rib setup from Whipple. I want to max the 2.9L out, but do not want to overspin it. If I get the 6% crank pulley what blower pulley do you guys use (3.25, 3.125, 3.00)? What boost you guys seeing?
I am going with 416ci, PRC 255 heads, fore pump, Id1300's, E-85, meth, and blower cam approx. 247,263, .624 lift
I read that around 17 psi might be the max??
I did see that COPO 2.9L came with a 3.50 pulley that hits around 15.0-15.5 psi.

Any thoughts? Thanks
Brad7294 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2021, 07:51 PM   #2
Batmanntexas

 
Batmanntexas's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro SS (2SS)
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Stafford, VA
Posts: 1,374
I'd focus more on the blower RPM versus boost number, as boost is just a measure of air resistance. For the 2.9L Whipple, max advertised RPM is 18,000.

To calculate blower RPM: (Balancer diameter/blower pulley diameter) x engine RPM = blower rpm

EX: (8/3.625) x 6500 = 14,345 RPM

Should be a stout combo, though!!
__________________
745RWHP/634RWTQ on 93 @ 10psi
806/676 on E85 @ 10psi

COTW 9/8/14
Batmanntexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-15-2021, 08:42 PM   #3
RedRyder
 
RedRyder's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 VR 2SS/RS M6 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Batmanntexas View Post
I'd focus more on the blower RPM versus boost number, as boost is just a measure of air resistance. For the 2.9L Whipple, max advertised RPM is 18,000.

To calculate blower RPM: (Balancer diameter/blower pulley diameter) x engine RPM = blower rpm

EX: (8/3.625) x 6500 = 14,345 RPM

Should be a stout combo, though!!
This.

The usual maxed combo is 8" balancer and 2.75" whipple pulley which usually translates to around 17psi. It's a touch higher than the recommended rpm but some people spin it even higher.
RedRyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 10:57 AM   #4
Brad7294
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Greensburg,PA.
Posts: 151
The 2.9L is maxed out at 18,000. Interesting. Did not know that.

So by the numbers pushing the RPM's to 6,800 is this:
(8/3.250) X 6800 = 16,592
(8/3.125) x 6800 = 17.300
(8/3.000) x 6800 = 18,020

I also read that ATI 10- rib set up for the COPO 2.9L, the crank pulley 6% is 7.95. The ATI web site for the 10-rib set up said the 6% crank pulley is 8.19.
Regardless it only changes the numbers above by a little.
So the way it looks going lower than a 3.00 is useless and could hurt the performance.
Brad7294 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 11:53 AM   #5
RedRyder
 
RedRyder's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 VR 2SS/RS M6 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 499
Quote:
Originally Posted by Brad7294 View Post
The 2.9L is maxed out at 18,000. Interesting. Did not know that.

So by the numbers pushing the RPM's to 6,800 is this:
(8/3.250) X 6800 = 16,592
(8/3.125) x 6800 = 17.300
(8/3.000) x 6800 = 18,020

I also read that ATI 10- rib set up for the COPO 2.9L, the crank pulley 6% is 7.95. The ATI web site for the 10-rib set up said the 6% crank pulley is 8.19.
Regardless it only changes the numbers above by a little.
So the way it looks going lower than a 3.00 is useless and could hurt the performance.
Not exactly useless to go under 3". You still make more power, but it will be out of the whipple's efficiency range.

As with most things, you should go with whatever you're comfortable with. 3" pulley will still make loads of power.
RedRyder is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-16-2021, 10:37 PM   #6
Brad7294
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Greensburg,PA.
Posts: 151
Thanks for the input. I probably am going with the 3.00

Maybe ted jannetty will see this thread and give his opinion.
Brad7294 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.