Homepage Garage Wiki Register Community Calendar Today's Posts Search
#Camaro6
Go Back   CAMARO6 > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > V8 LT1 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


AWE Tuning


Post Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-31-2017, 06:42 AM   #1
mschena98
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, 1987 IROC-Z
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 45
E85 HP numbers - real or fake??

Hey guys, so I just installed e85, a cold air intake, and tune on my 2016 SS with an A8. The car had a baseline of 345 whp completely stock which is pretty surprising. I'm hoping this is just the dyno, as other cars that I have seen have baselined closer to 400 whp. After the mods, the car made 402whp/412wtq. If those numbers are right I gained over 50whp from just a tune, e85, and CAI. I was expecting more like 430whp but these gains are still great. What do you guys think? Is the dyno off or does my car just not make as much power as it should?
mschena98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 06:47 AM   #2
vince3
 
Drives: Hyper Blue 16' M6 1ss
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Houston TX
Posts: 194
Was it the same dyno? Also which kind of dyno and do you have the dyno sheet?
__________________
MSD intake, Rotofab, 2" ARH headers with cats, E85 with EFI Tuning and Nitto 555R's. Best ET: 11.7@122mph
vince3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 06:51 AM   #3
mschena98
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, 1987 IROC-Z
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by vince3 View Post
Was it the same dyno? Also which kind of dyno and do you have the dyno sheet?
I don't have the baseline dyno sheet but I can post up the sheet after the mods later today. It was the same dyno both times. I believe it was a Dynocom
mschena98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 06:57 AM   #4
parish8

 
Drives: 17 SS a8
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: omaha
Posts: 1,678
The gain seems about right.
__________________
dropped a valve in the 6.2. now running a drop in rods and piston 5.3
best et 5.83@121 with the 5.3 http://www.camaro6.com/forums/showthread.php?t=465472
parish8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 07:10 AM   #5
iPODFAN11

 
iPODFAN11's Avatar
 
Drives: 2019 Shock ZL1
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: here
Posts: 800
On the new 5.3 in the Silverado/Sierra, with no mods right from the factory, on E85 it makes about 20-30 more HP and around 50 lb.ft. more torque over the stock ratings on 87 Octane. Just from switching fuels. I believe the #s you got.
__________________
From Super Chevy mag, April 2002: "Most of the weekend Settlemeire was meeting and greeting and quickly became known as simply "The Camaro Dude" (note, even his initials are SS)."

Quote:
Originally Posted by fbodfather View Post
we're certainly looking at it -- but right now, the emphasis MUST be on getting the Camaro V6 and SS out -- and having it exceed your expectations....

Once that's done....................
iPODFAN11 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 08:09 AM   #6
SSTony

 
SSTony's Avatar
 
Drives: SS Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Piscataway NJ
Posts: 1,782
Send a message via AIM to SSTony
The baseline seems really low
__________________
SSTony is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 08:52 AM   #7
USAFS197

 
USAFS197's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 Audi TT RS
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Navarre, Florida
Posts: 1,915
I'll be that guy to spare you from someone else jumping on that high horse.

A dyno is just a tool. Don't get hung up on numbers. Every dyno reads differently, etc., etc.

Honestly, though, as hard as it is, don't get too caught up with the numbers themselves but, look at the overall gain you had. A baseline of 345 and going up to 402 is a solid gain regardless. If you're needing a shot of confidence, find a shop with a dynojet and have them run the car--the numbers might be more in line with what you're looking for.
__________________
2018 Audi TT RS
2.4X 0-60, 1.6X 60', 120+mph 1/8th, 4.XX 60-130, 150+mph traps on 255/35/18 R888R tires on the street (unprepped).
2019 Audi RS3
About as fast as the TT RS
2019 Camaro ZL1 1LE
Sold
2018 Camaro SS 1LE
Sold
2019 Corvette Z06
Sold
2021 Charger Hellcat Redeye Widebody
Sold
USAFS197 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 08:55 AM   #8
Burly
 
Burly's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Apr 2016
Location: Spotsylvania, VA
Posts: 724
50rwhp gain is pretty good. I wouldn't have expected that much.
Burly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 09:22 AM   #9
BradfordCamaro
SABIO
 
BradfordCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
57HP. Almost 60HP....sounds good to me
My math for those mods going in would be
30 E85
20 Tune
10 CAI

You're good.
__________________



BradfordCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 10:01 AM   #10
PRAY


 
PRAY's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Sanford NC
Posts: 2,766
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradfordCamaro View Post
57HP. Almost 60HP....sounds good to me
My math for those mods going in would be
30 E85
20 Tune
10 CAI

You're good.
I can agree with that synopsis. Especially being a summer time tune. You can mix the numbers up a couple here and there but the total seems right.
__________________
2016 2SS. H/C SBE 1.37 60ft, 6.36@109.49, 9.97@136+. Nuff Said.
PRAY is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 10:08 AM   #11
AndyUK
 
Drives: 2017 Camaro SS
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 334
Quote:
Originally Posted by SSTony View Post
The baseline seems really low
It doesnt matter, dynos are just a tool to tell you what gain you made, he added 57hp which is a great gain from a few mods. If you take the SAE rating of 455hp then he's now running 512hp at the motor, which is again a great number.

If you want to end up with a high number you can take it to a dynojet and ask them to run stp, but it wont make the car any faster.
AndyUK is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 10:20 AM   #12
Ian SS

 
Ian SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 1SS, 2017 JKU Wrangler
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: San Diego
Posts: 876
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradfordCamaro View Post
57HP. Almost 60HP....sounds good to me
My math for those mods going in would be
30 E85
20 Tune
10 CAI

You're good.
Noooooooooope.

20 from a tune?

30 from just e85?


Realistically you're going to get about 10-15HP from just a tune and about 30 from e85 WITH A TUNE. I gained just shy of 20hp going from a 91 tune to a e85 tune, and I had supporting mods as well.
__________________
SLO 1SS - sold
1SS MRC NPP 6MT

2018 Ram Rebel 4x4 5.7
Ian SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 10:59 AM   #13
mschena98
 
Drives: 2016 Camaro 2SS, 1987 IROC-Z
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: Rochester, MI
Posts: 45
Thanks for the input guys. Even if the dyno numbers are low, the gains are still about right compared to what others have gotten so I can't complain lol
mschena98 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-31-2017, 11:24 AM   #14
BradfordCamaro
SABIO
 
BradfordCamaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 CAMARO 1SS
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Bradford, ON
Posts: 5,012
Quote:
Originally Posted by BradfordCamaro View Post
57HP. Almost 60HP....sounds good to me
My math for those mods going in would be
30 E85
20 Tune
10 CAI

Noooooooooope.
20 from a tune?
30 from just e85?
Realistically you're going to get about 10-15HP from just a tune and about 30 from e85 WITH A TUNE. I gained just shy of 20hp going from a 91 tune to a e85 tune, and I had supporting mods as well.



Quote:
Originally Posted by PRAY View Post
I can agree with that synopsis. Especially being a summer time tune. You can mix the numbers up a couple here and there but the total seems right.


You left out the above quote
__________________



BradfordCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Post Reply

Tags
cai, e85


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:16 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.