CAMARO 1SS: 111 MORE HORSEPOWER THAN MUSTANG GT 2010 HAHAHA

[JMAN311]

Originally Posted by Georgie

don't underestimate svt's cars. the terminator and gt500 are good for 800whp on stock internals

Originally Posted by Wookie

Finally, some

Didn't notice anyone underestimating them. I wouldn't dispute them being good cars, hell I've thought about getting an SVT before and if the Camaro wasn't back I'd probably already have one. But we are talking stock 2010 Mustang GT vs. Stock Camaro SS and what you get for the $$$. IMO Camaro wins hands down for any person looking to spend $30K for a sports car.

[Blownhotrodder]

yep, throw on a new screw and you have 1000 flywheel capable. New Gt500's can be had for about $40K. Damn tempting right now.

[JMAN311]

Originally Posted by Wookie

I'll give you that, the Camaro is probably the better bang for the buck. I like the looks of the Mustang better though, and I'd prefer a Whippled 2010 GT over a NA Camaro any day.

I would have figured a Kenne Bell for the Stang. KB and Whipple are pretty much the top brands for the Mustang aren't they?

Also, if you take the SC 2010 GT you'll have to keep your eyes peeled for all the SC Camaros that are gonna be out in force too

[JMAN311]

Originally Posted by Wookie

Why would you supercharge an LS motor? I'm all about Ford, but I give credit where credit is due. LS engines are great NA. Don't f*** up a good thing.



Plus all you GM guys probably couldn't figure out how to bolt one on.

Edit: Was counting on the swear filter to catch that.

Anyways, this is all hypothetical. I'm not too worried about anything a Camaro can throw at me

We'll find a Ford guy to help us put on the SC....seemings how they are so used to NEEDING them

[JMAN311]

Originally Posted by Wookie

Lol. Seems to be working though, I've never seen the rear end of an F body.

You should stop racing the same V6 Camaro over and over then

[2Muchmark]

Originally Posted by Wookie

Lol. Seems to be working though, I've never seen the rear end of an F body.

Me thinks thou doth protest too much

[Camarino]

Originally Posted by Wookie

Didn't know V6 Camaros could run 10 second quarters.

btw NY guys UNITE !! lol
http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=10290

[JMAN311]

Originally Posted by Wookie

Didn't know V6 Camaros could run 10 second quarters.

Just givin ya a hard time man. Those are impressive numbers and I was about to ask you how your stang would do in the quarter so you saved me the trouble What do you use for a daily driver?

[fad1]

Originally Posted by wjones14

Hate to break this to you, but that's like telling us the Pope is catholic.

You think everyone here isn't aware that the Camaro has 426 hp?

Wait the Pope is catholic ?










JK fella's, trying to lighten the mood.

Yeah the SS is one impressive machine.

[454lsxss]

Originally Posted by fdjizm

Dude you own a TC....


nuff said... lol dont even bother replying.



Dear blown, you sir with the truth award for the day.

if HP was all that counted there would be an 03,04,05,06,07,08,09 camaro wouldnt there?

get over the HP it's not the only thing that sells cars and its not the only reason people decide on buying a car...

you can have 1000hp off the dealership floor, if nobody wants your car guess what? well you know already.

i'd wrather save the gas and repair money a mustang would suck out of my pocket while i sit and wait for my camaro. Sure, it's easy to talk big now, while none of us are out in force. We'll see who goes back to his mustang forum here in a couple months when ya'll converge about how you are going to try to beat us this time...

btw, i bet you have those stupid effing tail lights that blink in sequential order...the biggest dbags always have those. can't wait till I never have to see another set of those ever again thanks to good ol'

[antimatr]

Originally Posted by 454lsxss

btw, i bet you have those stupid effing tail lights that blink in sequential order...the biggest dbags always have those. can't wait till I never have to see another set of those ever again thanks to good ol'

Just an FYI, I do believe Ford, for better or worse, has made sequential taillights standard for the 2010 'Stang.

[Vash]

In Other News: Ford retains 1970's Pinto style Brake lever for it's high tech / computer designed 2010 Mustang.

"We though it was good to keep it that way so that it irritates you by not letting you relax in the drivers seat if your tall".

/signed Ford sucks.

[Z/28orSs]

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/5V1FmAos0D4&hl=en&fs=1"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/5V1FmAos0D4&hl=en&fs=1" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>

[antimatr]

Originally Posted by Vash

In Other News: Ford retains 1970's Pinto style Brake lever for it's high tech / computer designed 2010 Mustang.

"We though it was good to keep it that way so that it irritates you by not letting you relax in the drivers seat if your tall".

/signed Ford sucks.

I don't have a 2010 'Stang, but my '06 has the P-brake lever in the same location, and I don't have any problems, and I'm right at 6ft. (No, the problem I have is the damn center console that I keep banging my elbow into, which is reportedly fixed for 2010.)

While we're on the subject of brake levers, I noticed on 2010 the lever is located AGAIN on the passenger side. WTF is up with that? It's not something that'll make my head explode, but my '95 Z28 had it in the same location and I found it somewhat annoying.