07-01-2010, 12:01 AM | #15 |
Drives: 2013 A6 GT 5.0 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Edmond, OK
Posts: 2,909
|
Is this new motor going to be in the SRT8 only? If it is and is 10k more than a SS then I would say who cares. If you are able to get it for the same price as the GT and SS then thats a different story. If this new motor is a SRT8 only option I would say they for sure need to put the 6.1 in the R/T because that car needs some serious help with its price range compitition.
__________________
BLK/BLK 1SS/RS Ordered 11-01-2009 Took delivery 12-22-2009. Heads/cam/converter/bolt ons. SOLD Feb 2015 to fund 6th gen LT1 SS with 8L90E.
|
07-01-2010, 01:09 AM | #16 |
Moderator.ca
|
If you hate these discussions, don't take part in them.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
07-01-2010, 01:35 AM | #17 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2SS/RS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Norman, OK
Posts: 1,125
|
|
07-01-2010, 04:07 AM | #18 |
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,997
|
The problem is the R/T is the one that needs the bump. Unless the srt8 can compare to the gt500 and z28, it's still super over priced and outgunned. Frankly, without well over 500hp, it's just not in the right price bracket.
|
07-01-2010, 09:44 AM | #19 |
Banned
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
|
Not if the new 6.4 has antiquated speed density on it like the current 5.7 and 6.1. There is a reason the Ford and Chevy motors respond better to mods, and this is a huge factor. Hell, Ford stopped using speed density in the 80s.
|
07-01-2010, 10:28 AM | #20 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
|
Quote:
If you're going to compare the L99 to a manual, and LS3 to manual.....then compare the LS3 to automatic, and the L99 to automatic....lol. Because I am sure the new automatic SRT8 won't "walk" the L99. |
|
07-01-2010, 10:51 AM | #21 | |
Banned
Drives: 2007 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Austin
Posts: 1,148
|
Quote:
The best matchup for the Challenger in a Challenger vs Camaro race is an auto Challenger vs an auto Camaro. |
|
07-01-2010, 11:22 AM | #22 | |
Banned
Drives: 2011 Avenger Heat Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Oregon
Posts: 1,697
|
Quote:
A LS3 vs. 6.4 fight will be more fair, with the 6.4 having a slight edge. |
|
07-01-2010, 11:26 AM | #23 | |
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
|
Quote:
|
|
07-01-2010, 11:31 AM | #24 |
1 n the head,2 n da chest
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
|
6.4l hemi 4200lbs/480bhp = 8.75
6.2l ss==3800lbs/426bhp = 8.92 5.0 GT ==3600lbs/412bhp = 8.73 hemi will trap high, but lose with stock tires unless they are 345/35's my guess: SS = 12.9 @ 111 GT = 12.8 @ 110 hemi 13.1 @ 112 on the same spring(may) track on the same day. if they manage to hook the hemi then 12.7 @ 112. the hemi has a huge torque and HP advantage over the smaller LS3. its tables turned on the "torque wins races" theme.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
|
07-01-2010, 12:11 PM | #25 |
Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
|
Right on. The current SRT8 runs 13.2 at 109 under fair condtions. Adding 55HP will shake things up, expect 12.9 @ 112 to be the the stated time, and hero runs in the 12.5s. It will walk the L99, especially from a roll.
__________________
|
07-01-2010, 02:18 PM | #26 | |
1 n the head,2 n da chest
Drives: 2002 cadillac deville Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: huntsville al.
Posts: 659
|
Quote:
the 6.4 will walk a lot of us from a roll.
__________________
2011GT E85, Kooks 1-7/8", 3" offroad X, 2-7/8" overaxles, Roush mufflers, CobraJet intake, SCJ monoblade throttle body, drew 4.5" CAI, Boss302S exhaust valve springs, Baby CobraJet exhaust cams. 3.73 gears, lightweight 300A. 455rwhp @7800/410rwtq SAE 5000lb roller dynojet
|
|
07-01-2010, 03:26 PM | #27 | |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS, 2008 Heritage 300C Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,911
|
Quote:
Weight comes into play big time. You also have to remember that the driver also adds weight. I'm pretty sure it would be a even match up, there will be no "walking" of any sort between the two. L99's are quick as all hell. Could the SRT8 beat it? probably. Few will win, few will lose. But I don't think by much. |
|
07-01-2010, 03:28 PM | #28 |
Moderator.ca
|
Driver weight matters more in lighter cars than heavier cars so it would hurt the Camaro more than it would hurt the Challenger.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Originally Posted by FbodFather My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors...... ........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!__________________ Camaro Fest sub-forum |
|
|
Tags |
6.4 hemi, dodge, srt8 |
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
New Camaro Exterior and Interior Stainless Steel Trim Parts from RPI Designs! | RPI Designs | Cosmetics and Lighting Modification Discussions | 36 | 04-02-2020 05:32 PM |
Answeres to questions I have stumbled on | dieseldave24v | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 13 | 02-23-2009 06:56 PM |