Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Other Generations > 4th Generation Camaros


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-29-2009, 01:03 PM   #1
Revo1
Don't Like it? Suggit.
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 14,832
Angry REALLY BAD MILEAGE....

I realized that It's no Prius, but I'm not even gettin 250 miles out of one tank. ALL highway. I filled it up, took it to Bakersfield and back, (110 miles each way) going 75mph the whole way, and had to refill when I got back into town. That tallies up to 11mpg!!! WTF? The 2002 Camaro SS A4 is rated at 27 mpg, and I've heard people say that they get better than that sometimes... It's not like I was carrying two tons of mortar or anything, just me and the lady. I even checked the tire pressure. Anything you guys can tell me would be appreciated
__________________

"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!"
A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp
Revo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 01:40 PM   #2
Chrisrp454

 
Chrisrp454's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 ABM 2SS/RS M6, 98Z28 M6
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Granbury, Tx
Posts: 1,532
No I still get around 23-27 in 98Z28 M6, she has 245,000+ that would be driving to work abount 60% hiway and 40% city, at aboutn 70mph on the hiways.
You sure you math is correct?
__________________
Always Remember! Rest in Peace Brothers
9/11/2001. And thanks to all those who defend and serve!


Ordered 5/23/2009
3400 with TPW of 08/03/09
3800 8/11/2009
Arrived 8/21/2009 2SS/RS/Aqua Blue/Grey Interior
Chrisrp454 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 02:26 PM   #3
phillip72699
Cams 4 life!
 
phillip72699's Avatar
 
Drives: 2002 Z-28 Camaro
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Dallas/FT.Worth
Posts: 155
You sure you math is correct?[/QUOTE]

I agree with Chrisp here....My 2002 Z-28 gets about 25-27 mpg. Double check the math there bro.....not calling you a liar but man that has gotta be wrong and if it isn't you must have a bad leak somewhere....check back and let us know.
phillip72699 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-29-2009, 02:54 PM   #4
Revo1
Don't Like it? Suggit.
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 14,832
Dudes... Filled her up. Left. Came back empty. 110miles x2 = 220m. 220m/19gallons = 11.57

No leaks of any kind, parking space is dry as a bone... I have no clue!!!

I know she does seem to be geared differently than I expected, at 80mph she sits at about 2600rpms, which seems high, considering my LT1 Z28 stayed just barely below 2000rpms at 80mph... I dunno. Only had her since April, haven't really checked on the mileage until now, when It seemed she was doing really bad...
__________________

"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!"
A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp
Revo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 07:07 AM   #5
Duffster
 
Drives: 2001 Camaro Z28
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Nauvoo, Illinois
Posts: 3
I agree w/Chrisrp, I've got cam/injectors/headers/tune (all done by 2Tightwads) and still knock down 25-28 highway and 11s in the 1/4 with 133K miles. Sounds like you need a tune/tune-up! Good luck,

D
Duffster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 08:34 AM   #6
Mr_Draco


 
Mr_Draco's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS/RS
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Western North Carolina
Posts: 7,182
The Camaro only has a 16 gallon tank not a 19 and depending on how accurate your gauge is and when you filled it up there may have been 3-4 gallons still in the tank when you filled it up. Even with taking these things into consideration, you are still getting less then 20 mph highway.
Mr_Draco is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 08:57 AM   #7
coolman
Guest
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 4,812
You have to know exactly how many miles you drove from the time you first filled up to the second time you fill up ,then exactly how many gallons you put back in the second time. That is how many gallons the trip took. Then Miles divided by gallons to get the correct miles/gallon. Thease cars only held 16 gallons of fuel so If it ran out of gas right at the pump it still would have gotten at least 13.75 miles/gallon. It most likely had 3 or 4 gallons left which would be it got at least around 18.

I don't think going 75mph helped your cause.
coolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 11:27 AM   #8
Bismarck318
 
Drives: '94 Base... Grounded due to E-Check
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Heart of the Rustbelt
Posts: 53
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolman View Post
I don't think going 75mph helped your cause.
Speaking of which, what is the optimum speed for efficency on these cars?
this used to be 55.

These cars had a 16 gallon tank (4th Gen?), all your numbers sound high, the most I could pull on mine on the highway was high 23's low 24's on trips averaging around the 60-65mph mark.

Mines been grounded due to county emmissions testing for a few years, been a while since I've been on a trip with it.
Bismarck318 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 12:43 PM   #9
Revo1
Don't Like it? Suggit.
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 14,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr_Draco View Post
The Camaro only has a 16 gallon tank not a 19 and depending on how accurate your gauge is and when you filled it up there may have been 3-4 gallons still in the tank when you filled it up. Even with taking these things into consideration, you are still getting less then 20 mph highway.
Yeah, 16 I know... The guys over on LS1tech mercilessly drove that point home LOL That would mean that it's not 11 mpg, closer to 14/15. That's still WAY below the 26mpg that was listed on the window sticker under hwy mileage in 2002... Best lead so far is that when I cleaned my K&N recently, I went a little heavy on the oil. This dirtied my MAF sensor, and now the sending unit is workin overtime for no reason... SO gonna get a can of carb cleaner and try to blow all that K&N oil out of the MAF and see how she does.

All I know is that my '96 Z28 GOT about 26/27 mpgs highway, and this one is rated for higher than that car was, which makes me
__________________

"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!"
A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp
Revo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 12:47 PM   #10
rforbes

 
rforbes's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: The Colony, Texas
Posts: 798
I had an issue with some gas leaking from the fuel probe in the tank. I didnt even notice it until I took it up to the dealer for something else unrelated, and he filled it up and told me it was leaking on the ground. I thought I had smelled gas when it was in the garage but I suppose it evaporated before I saw it. I dont know if this is your issue, but it wouldnt hurt to have it checked out.
rforbes is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 01:09 PM   #11
duder4thgen
 
Drives: Bird
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 266
Quote:
Originally Posted by Revo1 View Post
Yeah, 16 I know... The guys over on LS1tech mercilessly drove that point home LOL That would mean that it's not 11 mpg, closer to 14/15. That's still WAY below the 26mpg that was listed on the window sticker under hwy mileage in 2002... Best lead so far is that when I cleaned my K&N recently, I went a little heavy on the oil. This dirtied my MAF sensor, and now the sending unit is workin overtime for no reason... SO gonna get a can of carb cleaner and try to blow all that K&N oil out of the MAF and see how she does.

All I know is that my '96 Z28 GOT about 26/27 mpgs highway, and this one is rated for higher than that car was, which makes me
Don't use carb cleaner on your MAF, it leaves residue. I'd play it safe and pick up the stuff specifically for cleaning MAF's
duder4thgen is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 01:23 PM   #12
coolman
Guest
 

Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: PA
Posts: 4,812
Carb cleaner not good for maf. I would see if it's throwing any codes. I could be your cat starting to plug.
coolman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 01:58 PM   #13
VASCAR2
 
VASCAR2's Avatar
 
Drives: 94 Camaro, 10 1LT IBM Camaro
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Illinos
Posts: 232
I had a bad gas cap on my 94 Camaro and it would leak fuel after fill ups plus made the car hard to start because the fuel system was bleeding off pressure. I drove an LS1 99 State Police car and routinely got 22 MPG on patrol and 25 to 28 MPG traveling for training. This car was loaded to the gills with equipment and radios which accounted to several hundred pounds. My 94 Camaro will not suck the last couple of gallons of gas out of the tank. I have to find a fuel stop before 300 miles or I run the risk of walking. I'm curious if the O2 sensor could be bad causing your car to run rich hurting your fuel mileage.
VASCAR2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-30-2009, 06:09 PM   #14
Revo1
Don't Like it? Suggit.
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Fresno, CA
Posts: 14,832
Quote:
Originally Posted by coolman View Post
Carb cleaner not good for maf. I would see if it's throwing any codes. I could be your cat starting to plug.
No codes yet, so I doubt the oil went any further than the MAF. Wasn't aware of cleaner specifically for MAF, will def go with that
__________________

"Tops off, tach up baby- loud and proud!"
A Camaro lover from day one- 1996 3.8 V6 Camaro, to 1996 5.7 LT1 Camaro Z28, to the sold 2002 5.7 LS1 Camaro SS, and NOW, a [I]6.2 L99 VR 2SS/RS: XS Power stainless full exhaust, Airaid CAI, BMR drop springs and sways, custom tune by Cal Speed- 411rwhp
Revo1 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
How bad is the Understeer? Kingdipsy 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 17 08-20-2009 08:11 PM
SUPER BAD NEWS...Owner of Dealership sold the car I was waiting for to another dealer DETROIT2010Camaro Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 53 06-16-2009 08:22 PM
Bad News Today! Lee9710 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 51 06-03-2009 01:42 PM
Tougher EPA '08 mileage estimates are issued KILLER74Z28 General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion 0 12-12-2006 06:30 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:01 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.