Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-08-2009, 08:52 PM   #29
Super83Z
 
Super83Z's Avatar
 
Drives: 1999 Z28 1983 Z28
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: City of Champions,MA
Posts: 616
The LS3 has a forged crank, hypereutectic pistons and powdered connecting rods.

They put down over 500 RWHP with just a cam, tune and bolt-ons.
__________________
Current cars:
99 Z28
06 Silverado
14 Silverado

Last edited by Super83Z; 04-08-2009 at 09:31 PM.
Super83Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 09:46 PM   #30
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
The next time I have to delete 18 posts after I already asked you all to stay on topic, infractions will be issued to everyone involved.

Camaro guys: Don't get roped into a e-racing debate.
Mustang guys: Stop poking us in the eye.

Everyone has been warned.... again.
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 10:27 PM   #31
Lightninquick
 
Drives: (.)(.)'s
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Apple Valley
Posts: 34
ive done alot of searching on corvette forums. and i have found tons of ls3's are pushing over 700 rwhp with stock motors,,,,seems like the tranny gives up at much over 650rwhp. very promising info to me!

i was dead set on the manual 6 speed,,,,but after driving the great gt500 i think i want the automatic the 2ss has to offer. now i need to find out how much power the automatic tranny can handle,,lol.

im really hoping i like the apparance of the camaro as much in person.

by the way,,,ive always been a ford guy
Lightninquick is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 10:40 PM   #32
speedster
SST...
 
speedster's Avatar
 
Drives: SST Camaro 2010
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 5,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by Super83Z View Post
The LS3 has a forged crank, hypereutectic pistons and powdered connecting rods.

They put down over 500 RWHP with just a cam, tune and bolt-ons.

Agree completely with the pistons and rods you mention, but according to John Rydzewski the LS3's Assistant Chief Engineer (ACE) the crank is cast. (Nodular Iron, but cast)

"LS3's nodular iron, rolled-fillet-journal crankshaft is similar to those used in LS1 and LS6 engines except for counter weights altered to rebalance the engine for a slightly heavier piston."

Your 500 RWHP sounds great. Your car should fly with that hittin' the pavement...
__________________
speedster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2009, 10:55 PM   #33
attymf

 
attymf's Avatar
 
Drives: 2017 SS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: LI, NY
Posts: 755
I'd say that the ZR1 should be compared to a GT500 not a blown LS3. I don't see how GM could make a $35K sports car with forged everything and a blower on it.

From everything I have read I'd say you could bring an LS3 to about 700 hp and 625 tq. After that you need to upgrade internals. As for the tranny and rear and what they can handle I have no clue.

As for the ZR1 my friend has one that was sent to the Vette Dr's on Long Island and without a blower, turbo and laughing gas he runs low 10's of street tires. And its an old one, like 1995. Ironically, its currently in his garage in need of a tranny and rear!!! LOL
attymf is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 01:37 AM   #34
SummoneR
Paul
 
SummoneR's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 2SS/RS M6 "Marauder"
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: NOR*CAL
Posts: 6,257
Send a message via Yahoo to SummoneR
Quote:
Originally Posted by Xmicro_SS View Post
From what I have read, the Tremec Tranny of the 2SS can handle 700lbs of torque. So I imagine that the rest of the drive train is inline with a few tweeks maybe.
I thought it was 750HP?
__________________
SummoneR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 07:01 AM   #35
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtahvit View Post
The next time I have to delete 18 posts after I already asked you all to stay on topic, infractions will be issued to everyone involved.

Camaro guys: Don't get roped into a e-racing debate.
Mustang guys: Stop poking us in the eye.

Everyone has been warned.... again.
I didn't actually delete the previous 18 posts... Did I...

Last warning.. Stay on topic...
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 07:40 AM   #36
speedster
SST...
 
speedster's Avatar
 
Drives: SST Camaro 2010
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: East Coast of Florida
Posts: 5,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by SummoneR View Post
I thought it was 750HP?
If you are worried about the strenght of the Tremec Tranny, contact ProMotion Performance in Ft. Lauderdale/Miami Florida. For my Firebird with the engine in the signature, they took a TKO-600, changed to stronger, crygenically treated gears, put a tranny girdle on it and on the test rack it held 1,400 lb ft of torque. They went on say that was tried with a bone stock Tremec and the first part that failed was the threads on the input shaft. It was well over the factory rating. That says a bunch for the strength of a Tremec.
__________________
speedster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 08:08 AM   #37
CamaroSpike23
Truth Enforcer
 
CamaroSpike23's Avatar
 
Drives: anything I can get my hands on
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: anywhere and everywhere
Posts: 22,797
Send a message via Yahoo to CamaroSpike23
Quote:
Originally Posted by garagelogic View Post
Well, the facts are, and this is not really up for debate, a stock LS3 motor can only support a certain level of power before it breaks or becomes unreliable. We can debate all day what that number might be, but you cannot debate that the stock 5.4L engine that comes in the GT500 will support much more power before it reaches a similar breaking point.

Yes, absolutely you can build a LS3 with forged internals that will support as much, if not more, than the stock 5.4L engine, but there is a cost associated with doing so. Could you have a SS Camaro making more horsepower than a GT500 with a total cost (price to get into the vehicle, parts, labor, dyno time for tuning, tune cost, etc.) than what it would cost you to buy a 2010 GT500? Sure, but I would hazard to say the difference would be much less than you think it would once everything was added up.


Fast
Cheap
Reliable.

pick two. lol
Quote:
Originally Posted by gtahvit View Post
I didn't actually delete the previous 18 posts... Did I...


until we get one to play with or check out some of the vette boards to see what kind of numbers they are pushing with a blower on the stock LS3, its all up in the air.
__________________
Never race anything you can't afford to light on fire and push off a cliff
A group as a whole tends to be smarter than the smartest person in that group until one jackass convinces everyone otherwise.
Quote:
Originally Posted by BowtieGuy View Post
Nobody makes CamaroSpike happy. You just disgust him a little less than other people.

Quote:
Originally Posted by WheelmanSS View Post
Post count is truly an accurate measure of how cool someone is on the Internet.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Greg Norris View Post
I piss excellence
and fart awesomeness
"You can think I'm wrong, but that's no reason to quit thinking.”
Quote:
Originally Posted by Overflow View Post
But not all people were born awesome like you, Spike.
CamaroSpike23 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 09:17 AM   #38
vladkgb
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS Pewter
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 179
Ill take a stock ls3 with bolt on procharger @ a safe and reliable 5psi making over 500rwhp. My 2000 Camaro SS with a stock Ls1 and P1-SC procharger @ 5psi put down 455rwhp, got 20mpg, ran 11's, and i got over 50k reliable and enjoyable miles out of it.

Last edited by GTAHVIT; 04-09-2009 at 09:45 AM. Reason: Stop provoking the Mustang guys
vladkgb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 09:32 AM   #39
2005SilveradoSSAWD
 
2005SilveradoSSAWD's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Silverado SS AWD
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Fort Myers, FL
Posts: 30
500-550 rwhp on an LS3 is about all I would go, if I wanted to be in the safe zone; even in this range, your going to drastically shorten your engine life. The stock LS3 simply was not designed to run a great amount of boost reliably. Sure you can pick up a LS9 for a great sum of money, or go for all forged parts in you existing LS3, and then the sky is the limit. You people saying you can run 650 rwhp reliably are in for a rude awakening. I'm sure you can make that 650 rwhp on a stock ls3, but how long will it last? In my opinion, no matter how "safe" the tune, its gonna be power by the hour. The stock components were simply not made to withstand that sort of beating at that hp level, if it was, they wouldn't have made the LS9 block, and instead just slapped a blower on the LS3.
__________________
2005 Silverado SS AWD-PCMforless tune, exhaust, intake

"If guns cause crime, spoons made Rossie O' Donnel fat."

"My gun has killed less people than Ted Kenneddy's car"
2005SilveradoSSAWD is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 09:55 AM   #40
garagelogic
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Shelby GT500
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 1,686
Quote:
Originally Posted by vladkgb View Post
Ill take a stock ls3 with bolt on procharger @ a safe and reliable 5psi making over 500rwhp. My 2000 Camaro SS with a stock Ls1 and P1-SC procharger @ 5psi put down 455rwhp, got 20mpg, ran 11's, and i got over 50k reliable and enjoyable miles out of it.
In an effort NOT to continue to take the thread off topic, I will respond to your experience with your LS1/SC combo and say I agree 100% with what you say about the reliability of a low-boost blower on an LSx engine. I know plenty of people who have done the same.

Last edited by garagelogic; 04-09-2009 at 10:04 AM. Reason: Replied to an edited post. :D
garagelogic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 10:57 AM   #41
GTAHVIT
Blessed
 
GTAHVIT's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Sonic RS MT
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Saint Augustine FL
Posts: 28,444
New thread for the GT500 conversation..

Definitive GT500 Thread
GTAHVIT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2009, 11:15 AM   #42
logan1080
 
logan1080's Avatar
 
Drives: 2003 Crew Cab Duramax
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: canada
Posts: 693
So with the tremec trans that is in the camaro, what would we have to do to the transmission if we want it to handle over that 700rwhp mark? or should a guy just swap transmissions completely?
logan1080 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Nitrous System ?????s PoleCat2SSRS2010 Forced Induction - V8 29 12-08-2010 05:55 PM
LS3 engine specifications Tran Wiki 3 10-06-2010 10:56 PM
Well sunroof question answered (PIC) Black5thgen 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 152 08-29-2009 10:23 PM
LS3 Specs revealed: GM's 436hp Sick 6.2L LS3 TAG UR IT Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 28 07-30-2009 06:02 PM
LS3 power upgrade...WOW!!! Aries Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 25 07-10-2008 10:18 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.