Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Phastek Performance
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-06-2013, 04:00 AM   #29
OneSlowV
 
OneSlowV's Avatar
 
Drives: 2018 camaro ss
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 578
Those dogs move around good for there weight. The A5s run the best times and a stock SS isn't that fast. Most guys can't even trap over 105 mph it makes them easy pickings against a bolt on 5.7. And having a 07 charger srt8 before my SS i had no problems against the camaro.
OneSlowV is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 09:45 AM   #30
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010Slowmaro View Post
That is true. But most don't all in the driver. On the 5.7 RT, a turbo doesn't mean an easy win against a stock M6 SS. Those challengers are dogs.
And youlize a stock SS can run a high 12/low 13..... Most do not...... I am sorry, get real, a turbo R/T would murder a stock or even bolt-on SS. You are really underestimating, but i guess if it makes you feel better, more power to you lol......
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 10:46 AM   #31
2010Slowmaro
5.0 lol...
 
2010Slowmaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
And youlize a stock SS can run a high 12/low 13..... Most do not...... I am sorry, get real, a turbo R/T would murder a stock or even bolt-on SS. You are really underestimating, but i guess if it makes you feel better, more power to you lol......
So a turbo RT with MAYBE 450whp at best is going to murder a bolt on SS making similar power but with less weight? Tell me more...
__________________
2010 2SS M6 SWG built turbo car
2000 Z28 A4

Custom tuned by a Skinny White Guy
2010Slowmaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 11:31 AM   #32
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010Slowmaro View Post
So a turbo RT with MAYBE 450whp at best is going to murder a bolt on SS making similar power but with less weight? Tell me more...
First, i have to ask, what is your definition of a bolt-on?
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 11:35 AM   #33
2010Slowmaro
5.0 lol...
 
2010Slowmaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 140
Anything that doesn't go internal. It's THE definition of a bolt on. Longtubes, intake Manifold, TB, that stuff.
__________________
2010 2SS M6 SWG built turbo car
2000 Z28 A4

Custom tuned by a Skinny White Guy
2010Slowmaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:09 PM   #34
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010Slowmaro View Post
Anything that doesn't go internal. It's THE definition of a bolt on. Longtubes, intake Manifold, TB, that stuff.
I think 450 wheel HP is a big optimistic for your average bolt-on SS and only 450 is a bit pessimistic for a turbocharged R/T would would most certainly be more than a turbo simply bolted on......
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:13 PM   #35
2010Slowmaro
5.0 lol...
 
2010Slowmaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 140
Not 450. Just low-mid 400's. Remember the 250ish pound weight advantage.
I'm referring to a challenger RT with JUST a turbo kit. Which in reality makes about 450ish. We have no reason to assume its been modified past that point.
__________________
2010 2SS M6 SWG built turbo car
2000 Z28 A4

Custom tuned by a Skinny White Guy
2010Slowmaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:20 PM   #36
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010Slowmaro View Post
Not 450. Just low-mid 400's. Remember the 250ish pound weight advantage.
I'm referring to a challenger RT with JUST a turbo kit. Which in reality makes about 450ish. We have no reason to assume its been modified past that point.
Many have weighed their R/ts at 3800-3900 pounds, in reality the SRTs are the 4100 pound cars with their heavier brakes, wheels, seats, etc and again even a basic turbo swapped involves not that bolting on a turbo, it will have a tune, it will have exhause, it will have some sort of cold air, it will have the bigger TB necessary for the turbo.........
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:26 PM   #37
2010Slowmaro
5.0 lol...
 
2010Slowmaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Many have weighed their R/ts at 3800-3900 pounds, in reality the SRTs are the 4100 pound cars with their heavier brakes, wheels, seats, etc and again even a basic turbo swapped involves not that bolting on a turbo, it will have a tune, it will have exhause, it will have some sort of cold air, it will have the bigger TB necessary for the turbo.........
2013 Challenger RT curb weight is 4082 pounds.

All those things you named are included. Everything that comes with a turbo kit is everything you need to turbo your car. I'm not speculating, I'm saying what real turbo only RT's are putting down on a dyno. OP already said he beat it. It's not outside the realm of possibility is all I'm saying.
__________________
2010 2SS M6 SWG built turbo car
2000 Z28 A4

Custom tuned by a Skinny White Guy
2010Slowmaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:31 PM   #38
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010Slowmaro View Post
2013 Challenger RT curb weight is 4082 pounds.

All those things you named are included. Everything that comes with a turbo kit is everything you need to turbo your car. I'm not speculating, I'm saying what real turbo only RT's are putting down on a dyno. OP already said he beat it. It's not outside the realm of possibility is all I'm saying.
Well, this is not really even a race, 400 feet? i beleive I even said earlier the turbo wouldn't really have been able to spool to max power. A real race, the turbo R/T WILL have a sizable advantage and you realize that 200 pounds is onlt .1-.2/10s in the 1/4 mile? It is NOT that large of a difference PERIOD and as i said PEOPLE HAVE ACTUALLY WEIGHED THEIR R/TS and they are weighing less than 4000 pounds..
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:40 PM   #39
2010Slowmaro
5.0 lol...
 
2010Slowmaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
Well, this is not really even a race, 400 feet? i beleive I even said earlier the turbo wouldn't really have been able to spool to max power. A real race, the turbo R/T WILL have a sizable advantage and you realize that 200 pounds is onlt .1-.2/10s in the 1/4 mile? It is NOT that large of a difference PERIOD and as i said PEOPLE HAVE ACTUALLY WEIGHED THEIR R/TS and they are weighing less than 4000 pounds..
Small turbo running low boost on a v8? Yeah it would've been spoiled.
No 400 feet is not a good race. There's also the possibility that OP is bad with distances. You're using a LOT of BIG words which isn't making your point any more valid lol. Of course the challenger had an advantage. Since when does having an advantage mean you win every time? Welcome to racing 101, take a seat and learn something.
And sure they do buddy, sure they do
__________________
2010 2SS M6 SWG built turbo car
2000 Z28 A4

Custom tuned by a Skinny White Guy
2010Slowmaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:41 PM   #40
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010Slowmaro View Post
Not 450. Just low-mid 400's. Remember the 250ish pound weight advantage.
I'm referring to a challenger RT with JUST a turbo kit. Which in reality makes about 450ish. We have no reason to assume its been modified past that point.
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...e/viewall.html

450 HP turbocharged my a$$ and this is the older hemi that made considerably less HP stock.
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:42 PM   #41
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2010Slowmaro View Post
Small turbo running low boost on a v8? Yeah it would've been spoiled.
No 400 feet is not a good race. There's also the possibility that OP is bad with distances. You're using a LOT of BIG words which isn't making your point any more valid lol. Of course the challenger had an advantage. Since when does having an advantage mean you win every time? Welcome to racing 101, take a seat and learn something.
And sure they do buddy, sure they do
See above......
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-06-2013, 12:50 PM   #42
2010Slowmaro
5.0 lol...
 
2010Slowmaro's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Killeen, Texas
Posts: 140
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
http://www.hotrod.com/techarticles/e...e/viewall.html

450 HP turbocharged my a$$ and this is the older hemi that made considerably less HP stock.
Running high boost on a custom setup. Not what I'm talking about.
Your average out of the box turbo kit for a 5.7 will run 6-8 psi and make mid 400's whp. It can be turned up for more, sure.
__________________
2010 2SS M6 SWG built turbo car
2000 Z28 A4

Custom tuned by a Skinny White Guy
2010Slowmaro is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:10 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.