05-13-2016, 10:22 AM | #15 | |
Drives: 22 ZL1 1LE Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Miami,FL
Posts: 345
|
Quote:
|
|
05-13-2016, 12:11 PM | #16 | |
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,849
|
Quote:
Plus, it's no secret that Siri sucks incredibly badly as a service even 5 years after it came out, failing miserably unless you speak loudly and slowly with a very specific structure to your request. Not very natural at all. Pretty much the only thing I use it for is to set an alarm on my clock, since that's a straightforward request. With road noise, it's probably borderline unusable. |
|
05-13-2016, 12:26 PM | #17 | |
Nerd
Drives: 2016 Hyper Blue 2SS Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: DFW
Posts: 197
|
Quote:
Bluetooth audio will never sound good due to the the way it works.
__________________
Hyper Blue 2SS, 6M, MRC, NPP & Sunroof
|
|
05-13-2016, 12:56 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2016 Camaro 1LT Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: California
Posts: 3,491
|
bluetooth audio is re-compressed in a new codec when you're playing audio. There are a number your device can use and so BT audio quality will vary greatly depending on what device you're playing from and what is actually receiving it.
It's surprisingly decent if you have a flagship cell phone made in the last year or two on the Bose setup in the Camaro. But like anytime you compress something in a lossy codec, decompress and compress again in another lossy codec, and decompress - you're going to get increasingly worse audio out to the speaker. carplay/android auto will be sent the digital audio from the phone so skips the extra encoding step. However, if you're streaming your audio online and it's not a downloaded song living on your phone - you're getting a recompressed copy of what was originally uploaded. So little better than bluetooth in that situation. The best setup would be flash drive or having the music on your phone accessed via mtp or mass storage mode. But that's not always convenient, especially if you're using carplay/aa for navigation. Though there's really no point in really knitpicking audio in a noisy environment like a car. For most people the bluetooth will be good enough. Wireless carplay/aa would only ever use bluetooth if the spec requires it for mic input audio profile (like it does now). Otherwise you're looking at p2p wifi connection. Honestly though, the only way wireless only would be viable is if they completely change how carplay/aa works because it would destroy all current devices batteries in a matter of an hour or so. I get the feeling it's such a low priority for both companies to implement because they're waiting for tech to catch up to minimize the negative feedback that will inevitably come when everyone's phone dies halfway through a car trip on wireless carplay. So I wouldn't hold your breath on wireless only mode being available next year and if it is by some surprise chance, it'll only be usable for short spurts and most will still end up plugging in until something changes in battery tech. |
05-13-2016, 01:09 PM | #19 |
Drives: 4 wheels Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Earth
Posts: 1,351
|
CarPlay us such trash. Unless you barely use it, the thing just sucks.. Apple dropped the ball on that as well.
|
05-13-2016, 01:44 PM | #20 |
I completely disagree. I don't use carplay but Android Auto works really well IMHO. I really like the ability to select which audio app I want to play from as well as google maps and just the home screen in general. I rarely use the mylink home screen anymore.
__________________
Adrenaline Red
20" 5 Spoke Black Black Side Spear Dual Mode Exhaust MRC Splash Guards 1G1FG1R74G0124089 |
|
05-13-2016, 02:02 PM | #21 | |
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,849
|
Quote:
I don't know enough about Wireless Apple CarPlay to say how it works. I don't know if it renders its own UI locally and then constantly beams this to the car's receiver at a fixed or variable framerate kind of like a video feed going to a remote display, or if it just sends raw data that's then handled by some GPU on the car's receiver for the actual rendering. I think the latter approach would save a lot of battery, making it not much more taxing than streaming just audio. It's sort of like what you mentioned about the merits of sending data in raw form from an audio file versus encoding and decoding multiple times. |
|
05-13-2016, 02:25 PM | #22 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
05-13-2016, 10:54 PM | #23 | |
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 1,849
|
Quote:
|
|
05-13-2016, 11:57 PM | #24 |
Drives: 2016 2SS Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SFL
Posts: 207
|
If battery is an issue I would still rather have wireless carplay and put the phone on the charging pad rather than having to plug it in each time.
|
05-14-2016, 09:44 PM | #25 | |
Drives: Cars Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: N/A
Posts: 1,986
|
Quote:
Any idea when 2017 orders will start rolling in? Also, is there any news on changes/updates from the 2016 to 2017 model? Hopefully not just a price increase |
|
05-14-2016, 09:47 PM | #26 | |
|
Quote:
Teen driver mode, fifty badge on the wheel and new color Arctic Blue(?) as far as I know.
__________________
Current: '17 2SS Hyper Blue, A8, MRC, NPP
Past: '99 SS Camaro A4, '73 Camaro 383 A3 "Voices in your head are not considered insider information." 3800 Status - 6/16/16 (Built!) 6000 status - 6/29/16 (Delivered!) |
|
|
|
Post Reply
|
|
|