06-19-2011, 06:52 AM | #85 | |
Drives: '07 SRT8 SuperBee, '09 GT500 Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Austin, Tx
Posts: 684
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
06-19-2011, 06:56 AM | #86 | |
Drives: 2011 Challenger SRT8 6.4L 392 Hemi Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Smyrna, TN
Posts: 778
|
Quote:
Not yet... I plan on it after I decide what exhaust I am going with. The good thing about my car is it has a built in 0-60, 1/8 mile and 1/4 mile guages...... I can actually test it without going to the track if I can find a road to do it on.
__________________
2011 Stock 6.4L 392 Hemi Challenger
Flowmaster American Thunder Series Cat Back Camaro parts for sale: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=152474 |
|
06-19-2011, 07:18 AM | #87 | |
How U Doin?
|
I didn't call you out. I assumed you wouldn't think my comment was directed at you due to our previous conversation. I appreciate the advice you gave me and I said so in our PMs.
So I'm stupid now?? No need to bring politics into this. The whole Mustang/Camaro battle is bad enough without mixing that in. You say the Mustang isn't the be all end all, but sometimes you and a couple others come across like it is. I KNOW the Camaro isn't the best all around performing car in its class, and I can accept that. I just don't understand why you and other people feel the need to try to prove the 5.0's superiority on a Camaro site. I don't want to argue over this because it's pointless and it proves nothing. Quote:
|
|
06-19-2011, 07:26 AM | #88 |
Banned
|
|
06-19-2011, 08:09 AM | #89 | |
Drives: 2002 ws6 Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,202
|
Quote:
the 5.7 iroc still had more power. but it was handicapped by more weight and the extremely bad decision by GM to make it auto only.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
|
|
06-19-2011, 08:27 AM | #90 |
Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
|
Oh okay, I don't remeber the 80s.... so yeah. My friend has a 5-speed 5.0 Fox Body Mustang and always talks about how it was much faster than the Camaro for a large part of the 80s, I haven't done the research to verify this claim.
|
06-19-2011, 08:31 AM | #91 | |
Banned
|
Quote:
That all changed in 93 when I got my LT1 Z28....Camaro dominated the Mustang GT all the way up to 2011. |
|
06-19-2011, 08:34 AM | #92 |
Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
|
Interesting.... so 2002 Camaro vs 2010 Mustang... Camaro would still win then ?
|
06-19-2011, 08:35 AM | #93 |
Banned
|
|
06-19-2011, 09:05 AM | #94 |
Drives: Slow Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Metro Chicago,Illinois
Posts: 560
|
I remember the 80's well, and had both a 86 and 88 GT back then. Camaros and Firebirds didn't stand a chance. Until 1989, when the turbo T/A came out. The Mustang never had an answer to that.
|
06-19-2011, 01:07 PM | #95 |
Drives: 2011 Inferno Orange 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 141
|
Maybe not a 2010... but I had a 2011 CTS Cadillac Coupe 3.6L that WALKED AWAY from my friends stock 2006 Mustang GT. That should never happen. The 2010 was an improvement... 2011 was a complete change (5.0). IMO the new 5.0 and the 03-04 Cobras are the only respectable Mustangs as of late
|
06-19-2011, 01:19 PM | #96 | |
Drives: bug Join Date: May 2009
Location: nv
Posts: 1,319
|
Quote:
|
|
06-19-2011, 04:13 PM | #97 |
Drives: 2011 Inferno Orange 2SS/RS A6 Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Warner Robins, GA
Posts: 141
|
|
06-19-2011, 08:32 PM | #98 | |
Drives: racecars Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,776
|
Quote:
So.... 2002 Z28 SS Camaro 6-speed vs 2010 Mustang GT Track Pack 6-speed.... who would win through the 1/4 ? |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
5th Gen Suspension -- The Book | JusticePete | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 151 | 05-07-2015 05:52 PM |
Think about this and the Z28 5th gen | 13F20 | Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics | 41 | 09-04-2010 12:59 AM |