Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-26-2013, 09:19 PM   #29
Rhino79


 
Rhino79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS L99/Auto
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Cabot, AR
Posts: 2,827
I made 492 locked on 93 octane 503 Rwhp on e85. Stock heads and bottom end. Stock compression. 460 is easy on stock heads. It gets harder from there.
Rhino79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 10:15 PM   #30
litle88
V8 Lounge member #2
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Drives: 2001 Ws6
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Burbank,IL
Posts: 6,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by BplumCrazy-SS View Post
I will let everyone know hopefully TOMORROW
Come on with the come on!!
You better post up some vids or it didn't happen lol
__________________
2001 ws6, 40k miles, Ls3 416 stroker, short block built by PER the rest by me. LPE Ls3 heads milled to 12-1 comp, FAST 102, NW 102, kooks 2", dual DMH cutouts, Magnaflow C/B, BTR cam + springs. Full UMI suspension.
litle88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:15 PM   #31
kaler
 
kaler's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Dodge 3500 dually Mega Cab
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: discovery bay,ca
Posts: 667
The most important factor will be the dyno period. Look at it this way on average a stock L99 puts down 320rwhp you would need to pick up 180rwhp that is just not realistic.
__________________
2010 SS a6 with TSP VVT-3 cam,PRC ported heads,Yank 3200,Kooks and CAI inc. = +121 RWHP 1/4 mile 12.1 E.T. On P-Zero Tires.
kaler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:15 PM   #32
1989GTA
 
Drives: 1989 GTA Trans Am
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 610
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhino79 View Post
I made 492 locked on 93 octane 503 Rwhp on e85. Stock heads and bottom end. Stock compression. 460 is easy on stock heads. It gets harder from there.
You have one of the best combinations I have seen.
1989GTA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:30 PM   #33
trw427ss

 
trw427ss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 2SS/RS L99
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Denham Springs La.
Posts: 811
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1989GTA View Post
You have one of the best combinations I have seen.
Yes he does and its a VVT cam also!
__________________
2013 2SS/RS L99/A6 Crystal Red Metallic Tincoat 12.76@108.98mph Bone Stock
12.46@111.19mph with New Era CAI & U/D Pulley
12.12 @ 114.16 after Stainless Power headers and no tune yet on stock P-Zero's!
12.007@ 115.20 With 18" Drag Radials - 11.93 @115.19 Added a PTB 11.76 @116.59 With Yank SS3200 Converter - 11.63 @116.52 After PI and Tuning 11.44 @118.75 New Best
10.72 @127.93 after heads and Cam and Yank SS3600
trw427ss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-26-2013, 11:39 PM   #34
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rhino79 View Post
I made 492 locked on 93 octane 503 Rwhp on e85. Stock heads and bottom end. Stock compression. 460 is easy on stock heads. It gets harder from there.
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1989GTA View Post
You have one of the best combinations I have seen.
Quote:
Originally Posted by trw427ss View Post
Yes he does and its a VVT cam also!
With mid 10sec time slips to go with it.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 03:49 AM   #35
BplumCrazy-SS
 
BplumCrazy-SS's Avatar
 
Drives: 416 w/TH400
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Houston
Posts: 697
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaler View Post
The most important factor will be the dyno period. Look at it this way on average a stock L99 puts down 320rwhp you would need to pick up 180rwhp that is just not realistic.
we shall see.......... and I hope you are wrong...lol
BplumCrazy-SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 04:13 AM   #36
brantley847
v It bites.
 
brantley847's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 IBM 2SS/RS
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Orlando, FL
Posts: 3,585
Quote:
Originally Posted by axis View Post
With mid 10sec time slips to go with it.
__________________
2011 2SS/RS
Performance: 439 RWHP: 226/236 Comp Cam, Kooks 1-7/8, CAInc, Borla S type, Vmax TB, Rx Catch Can, Trans cooler, SLP 160 termo, Melling high volume, Eibach Springs/Sways 1" drop, Whiteline complete bushing kit.
brantley847 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 09:49 AM   #37
POS Dakota
 
POS Dakota's Avatar
 
Drives: GMs and Chryslers
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 367
Quote:
Originally Posted by VADER SS L99 View Post
I think it will take more than that unless its a pure race cam. I think it will take the above mods plus a converter that can be locked up on the dyno or more displacement or a blower.
Someone who knows how to design a lobe can make a lot more with the same advertised specs than Comp Mart (for example) ever will. Just saying.

There's a reason it costs 500+ bucks for a cam from a master vs some lobes spun off from a computer catalog like camquest. Airflow is a mind boggling thing when you become exposed to all the crazy things that happen in a running engine.

The guys who truly understand this are the ones who make the big bucks.
POS Dakota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 11:28 AM   #38
Nightmare2012
come find out;)
 
Drives: stockish 2012 camaro ss
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: speed county
Posts: 2,166
Time updates: 12.4 @ 115mph haven't had a chance to get on a computer so time slips and bids to follow traction was definitely an issue with the stock suspension and new found power/stall. Weather was at 2200 air density.
Nightmare2012 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 11:35 AM   #39
JEFF75645

 
Drives: his wife crazy buying mods
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Gilmer, TX
Posts: 1,342
I guess that's not bad for a first run but could be deep in the 11s with some DR's and a good 60' . My first run was 12.4 @ 114 without the stall and a 2.1 60' .After driving my car with the stall I'm not gonna hit the track until after I get the drag radials.
__________________
Gone But Not Forgotten
JEFF75645 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 11:36 AM   #40
Muddflap

 
Muddflap's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Longview, Tx
Posts: 797
Quote:
Originally Posted by JEFF75645 View Post
I guess that's not bad for a first run. My first run was 12.4 @ 114 without the stall. After driving my car with the stall I'm not gonna hit the track until after I get the drag radials.
Jeff, what track do you go to?
Muddflap is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 11:36 AM   #41
POS Dakota
 
POS Dakota's Avatar
 
Drives: GMs and Chryslers
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Detroit
Posts: 367
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nightmare2012 View Post
Time updates: 12.4 @ 115mph haven't had a chance to get on a computer so time slips and bids to follow traction was definitely an issue with the stock suspension and new found power/stall. Weather was at 2200 air density.
12.4 is good given the situation. I'd be happy with that so far.
POS Dakota is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-27-2013, 11:40 AM   #42
JEFF75645

 
Drives: his wife crazy buying mods
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Gilmer, TX
Posts: 1,342
Quote:
Originally Posted by Muddflap View Post
Jeff, what track do you go to?
Dallas Raceway
__________________
Gone But Not Forgotten
JEFF75645 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.