My 2011 v6 m6 VS my dads 2011 challenger rt

[mjf6866]

Originally Posted by a_Username

No I don't remember; there's nothing to do "all again."

http://camaro5.com/forums/showthread...=107598&page=4

Sure there is...this is just a rehash from February.

You were trying to make it as complicated then as you are now!

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by mjf6866

http://camaro5.com/forums/showthread...=107598&page=4

Sure there is...this is just a rehash from February.

You were trying to make it as complicated then as you are now!

Oh... well I guess I'm done here.

[wbt]

Originally Posted by mjf6866

http://camaro5.com/forums/showthread...=107598&page=4

Sure there is...this is just a rehash from February.

You were trying to make it as complicated then as you are now!

Mwahahahaha!!!!

It is useless with him. He lives in a fantasy world full of leprechauns and unicorns. He has no track experience to bring to the table. The best he can do is what Google can tell him.

Here is a quote from the other thread from him:

Refresh my memory... what did they do?

/me adds to my signature.

[GretchenGotGrowl]

Originally Posted by The IOM Ninja

In a Naturally Aspirated Engine, not Forced Induction or Direct Injection, there is NO Replacement For Displacement. Looking at any low displacement engine will show you this. For example:

The BMW M3 S65 4.0L V8 has 414 Horsepower but only 296 lbft of Torque

The Mustang 5.0 Coyote V8 in the Boss 303 has 444 horsepower and 380 lbft of torque.

The LS3 and L99 6.2L V8's respectively have 426/400 Horsepower and 420/410 lbft of torque.

With a low displacement engine the higher you go with the horsepower the larger the gap, generally speaking, between Horsepower and Torque figures. As with anything though you can do many things to work with these figures. High-Revving as an example.

The same applies for the most part between the GT500 and the ZL1, supercharging and turbo charging help boost torque numbers, that is one of the reasons that BMW is turbocharging most of their performance cars.

I'm sure since your Camaro is turbocharged you already knew all that and that last bit is because any kind of Forced Induction or Direct Injection is bypassing Natural Aspiration. You might have a different definition of a N/A engine but mine is one that doesn't have anything Forced Into It. All respect to you though

My point was that both the LLT and LFX are naturally aspirated. There is no forced injection from the factory. Direct injection simply injects FUEL into the cylinders, not air.

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by wbt

Mwahahahaha!!!!

It is useless with him. He lives in a fantasy world full of leprechauns and unicorns. He has no track experience to bring to the table. The best he can do is what Google can tell him.

Here is a quote from the other thread from him:

/me adds to my signature.

I'm glad your own idiocy amuses you. Also, it's kind of weird I infatuate you so much that you "quote" me in your signature.

[wbt]

Originally Posted by a_Username

I'm glad your own idiocy amuses you. Also, it's kind of weird I infatuate you so much that you "quote" me in your signature.

I reserve that space for folks like yourself who talk the talk but don't walk the walk.

[The IOM Ninja]

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl

My point was that both the LLT and LFX are naturally aspirated. There is no forced injection from the factory. Direct injection simply injects FUEL into the cylinders, not air.

Direct Injection technically does force gas in to cylinders. Forced INDUCTION forces AIR. If you consider Direct Injecting natural then all the power to you. A lot of the car community doesn't though.

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by wbt

I reserve that space for folks like yourself who talk the talk but don't walk the walk.

I've been to the track a few times, but I've only made around 10 passes (all in one night). I admit I did terrible (9.1@80), considering it was my first time out with the car and haven't had the time to go back. I could reserve my signature for idiots, but I'm sure the moderators of C5 would hate having 500 quotes from you taking up two pages in one thread every time I post.

[PoorMansCamaro]

Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl

My point was that both the LLT and LFX are naturally aspirated. There is no forced injection from the factory. Direct injection simply injects FUEL into the cylinders, not air.

Originally Posted by The IOM Ninja

Direct Injection technically does force gas in to cylinders. Forced INDUCTION forces AIR. If you consider Direct Injecting natural then all the power to you. A lot of the car community doesn't though.

i don't get it. you are agreeing with gretchen, that DI injects fuel only...

So there are people out there that think the v6 camaro is forced inducted from the factory, and that it's not naturally aspirated?

[wbt]

Originally Posted by a_Username

I've been to the track a few times, but I've only made around 10 passes (all in one night). I admit I did terrible (9.1@80), considering it was my first time out with the car and haven't had the time to go back. I could reserve my signature for idiots, but I'm sure the moderators of C5 would hate having 500 quotes from you taking up two pages in one thread every time I post.

Lol! That is terrible. Falls right in-line with what I mentioned previously in this thread about the average owner. For your sake I hope it wasn't with the following mods:

1. Jannetty Racing Tuning
2. Cold Air Inductions, Inc. CAI system
3. American Racing 2" Headers w/ cats

You drive an auto so that takes shifting out of the equation.

My 13.4 bone stock pass in the Challenger netted a 8.7 in the 1/8th@81.18.

I certainly wouldn't be flapping my lips like you do with those times.....

I see now why you have your knot in a twirl most if the time especially when BONE STOCK Challenger's are posting better times.

.....oh wait....that wasn't at the same track on the same day now was it.....

[The IOM Ninja]

Originally Posted by PoorMansCamaro

i don't get it. you are agreeing with gretchen, that DI injects fuel only...

So there are people out there that think the v6 camaro is forced inducted from the factory, and that it's not naturally aspirated?

No there are people that think Direct Injection is not Naturally Aspirated. I don't believe forcing anything into a cylinder qualifies as Naturally Aspirated.

[PoorMansCamaro]

Originally Posted by The IOM Ninja

No there are people that think Direct Injection is not Naturally Aspirated. I don't believe forcing anything into a cylinder qualifies as Naturally Aspirated.

So what exactly is the v6 camaro? lol i'm so confused.

[a_Username]

Originally Posted by wbt

Lol! That is terrible. Falls right in-line with what I mentioned previously in this thread about the average owner. For your sake I hope it wasn't with the following mods:

1. Jannetty Racing Tuning
2. Cold Air Inductions, Inc. CAI system
3. American Racing 2" Headers w/ cats

You drive an auto so that takes shifting out of the equation.

It wasn't; it was my first pass ever on a bone stock L99. There were some midly built fox bodys with slicks running mid-low 8s; I remember people telling how much they disliked the track because of terrible track-prep.

My 13.4 bone stock pass in the Challenger netted a 8.7 in the 1/8th@81.18.

I certainly wouldn't be flapping my lips like you do with those times.....

I see now why you have your knot in a twirl most if the time especially when BONE STOCK Challenger's are posting better times.

.....oh wait....that wasn't at the same track on the same day now was it.....

So wait, you're "flapping your lips" about your R/T where there a many a bone stock Camaro running faster than you? See how that works? I find it even more amusing that you're resorting to terribly thought up personal attacks instead of admitting you're an idiot; maybe it's that overinflated ego at work? You keep on posting pictures of your headers on photobucket and maybe someone, someday will pay attention to you for another reason besides making fun of your reading skills.

[wbt]

Originally Posted by a_Username

It wasn't; it was my first pass ever on a bone stock L99. There were some midly built fox bodys with slicks running mid-low 8s; I remember people telling how much they disliked the track because of terrible track-prep.

Excuses....excuses....

Keep telling yourself that.

So wait, you're "flapping your lips" about your R/T where there a many a bone stock Camaro running faster than you? See how that works? I find it even more amusing that you're resorting to terribly thought up personal attacks instead of admitting you're an idiot; maybe it's that overinflated ego at work? You keep on posting pictures of your headers on photobucket and maybe someone, someday will pay attention to you for another reason besides making fun of your reading skills.

I figured you wouldn't get it even after I have said it multiple times and will one last time for you....

1. I work on my own cars and have said proof of which you and everyone else has seen.
2. I post evidence of runs at the track so the normal folks can see. (You watch it too apparently in disbelief.)
3. Your arguments have nothing to back them up with and you come off as a fool. Empty and baseless. It has nothing to do with ego.

It sucks being called out for what you are doesn't it? Take it as a lesson learned for next time.

BTW - you need to look in the mirror on personal attacks. You initiated this banter (as you always do).