05-15-2010, 10:12 PM | #1 |
Drives: V45 Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Southern California
Posts: 1,270
|
Camaro SS makes "Fastest cars under $50,000" list
As reported on CAMARO5 HOMEPAGE.
Here's what they wrote: (Somebody messed up bad with the GT500 #'s) American Muscle Foreign-made cars--including the Porsche Boxster, Infiniti G37, Lexus IS and BMW Z4--dominate our list, but three American-made cars top it: Ford's $48,645 Mustang GT500, Dodge's $41,230 Challenger SRT8 and Chevy's $30,945 Camaro SS go from zero to 60 miles per hour in 4.3, 4.9 and 4.6 seconds, respectively. And the Challenger even has a zero-to-60 timer right on the dashboard. Ford's GT500 packs a supercharged 5.4-liter V8 engine with 305 horsepower and 208 pound feet of torque. The SS also has a V8, but this one's even bigger: a 6.2-liter, 426-horsepower engine. Both cars have standard 6-speed manual transmissions. These autos embody the legacy of American muscle cars, says Mike Caudill, an automotive expert for NADA Guides. But of the three, the Mustang has been around the longest--with continuous production since it debuted came out in 1964. (The Challenger and Camaro both temporarily left the market, were redesigned and then reissued.) To compile our list of the fastest cars under $50,000, we combed through zero-to-60 mph times for all likely performance coupes, sedans and roadsters (SUVs and trucks didn't qualify when it came to competing with these cars on speed) sold in the U.S. that cost under $50,000. The vehicles with the fastest times made our list. Zero-to-60 times were provided by the manufacturers or by Kelley Blue Book. Sport packages that may have decreased acceleration times but pushed the MSRP over $50,000 were not considered. http://autos.yahoo.com/articles/auto...s-Under-50-000 |
05-15-2010, 10:29 PM | #2 |
CGM is the Best! Thx GM
Drives: 2010 2LT RS Camaro, Auto + Sunroof Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: MA
Posts: 513
|
Nice read, thx
__________________
Proud Owner of a CGM 2 LT/RS Auto Transmission w/Sunroof and Spare Tire |
05-15-2010, 10:32 PM | #3 |
Red Big Block Camaro
Drives: 93 C1500, VR Big Block 70 Camaro RS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 966
|
haha. i dont thinks its possible to have a SC engine that only makes 305 hp. and it seems to me like theyre saying the camaro is the best bang for your buck
__________________
my 1970 Camaro RS. Frame off restoration. 600 HP 454 Naturally Aspirated. GM Performance Heads, Comp Mechanical cam, Weiand Stealth Intake, Holley 750 Carb. Hooker and Flowmaster exhaust system. Victory Red paint, True Rally Sport.
|
05-16-2010, 08:55 AM | #4 |
love. my. car.
|
The Camaro really is the best bang for you buck. If you got a comparably equipped GT, with brembos, and heated seats that are included with the 2SS, you are charged ~36,000 for the Mustang and the 2SS is $34,000
Ford was smart though because the base price is less than the Camaro... They can now brag that it's cheaper to buy and performs as good or better than the SS (if you get summer tires and upgraded gears).
__________________
|
07-01-2010, 09:24 PM | #5 |
COTW: 12/13/10
Drives: 1969 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Orange County, CA
Posts: 7,880
|
haha 305 hp for the GT500
__________________
"Are you one of those boys who prefer cars to women? - I'm one of those boys that appreciates a fine body, regardless of the make." 1969 CAMARO JOURNAL: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=341239 | FACEBOOK: http://www.facebook.com/taylor.ryan.apt | GRAPHIC DESIGN: www.aptdesigns.net |
07-01-2010, 09:27 PM | #6 | |
Drives: everyone crazy... Join Date: May 2009
Location: SW Florida
Posts: 2,109
|
Quote:
|
|
07-01-2010, 09:39 PM | #7 |
How U Doin?
|
I believe he underrated the GT500 a bit. 305?
|
07-01-2010, 09:44 PM | #8 |
Drives: 2010 IBM Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sanger,CA
Posts: 1,834
|
lol the GT500 has less HP then my 2010 v6 camaro way 2 go ford ;-P
|
07-01-2010, 09:55 PM | #9 |
RIP JoePa
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS & 2001 Audi S4 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Central PA
Posts: 644
|
hahahah thats all i get...until i drive 5 miles... then i have 540
__________________
|
07-01-2010, 09:56 PM | #10 |
Tampa Gulf Coast Family
|
__________________
|
07-01-2010, 10:36 PM | #11 |
Drives: 3.4l 1995 camaro Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: miami, fl
Posts: 2,202
|
the supercharged ss cobalt had like 205 hp
__________________
just call me alex. they make anti-me PSA's cos im dope lmao
|
07-02-2010, 12:27 AM | #12 |
Drives: Inferno Orange 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: From: Los Angeles
Posts: 686
|
they messed up on the GT500 pretty badly.... HAHAHA. But cool article
|
07-02-2010, 03:31 AM | #13 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS LS3, 92 Camaro RS Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 531
|
Mustang V8 hp mistake
412 hp, supercharged 5.0 base price = $46,725
426 hp, stock 6.2L base price = $33,945 most superchargers add about 100~144 hp, therefore, is a non-supercharged 5.0 about 312 hp or less? |
07-02-2010, 06:19 AM | #14 | |
Ramsey
|
Quote:
Stick with the SS' I'd say. I own a v6 2010 Camaro, and that purrty GT Mustang I raced the other day, sure did take awhile to catch up with me, and when he did catch up with me, it took him a little bit to get ahead of me. But he had the help of a old Nissan Quest that got in my way. My Speedo' read 105 in a 45 zone. -Ramsey |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
CAMARO WIKI | Tran | Wiki | 66 | 04-22-2024 11:41 AM |
5th Gen Suspension -- The Book | JusticePete | Suspension / Brakes / Chassis | 151 | 05-07-2015 05:52 PM |
My Reivew of Camaro SS vs Mustang GT | ss ZHO | Chevy Camaro vs... | 6 | 06-05-2010 12:23 AM |
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release | Tran | Camaro Convertible Forum | 12 | 11-18-2009 07:05 PM |