07-01-2011, 10:29 AM | #1 |
STS guys exhaust wrap???
Hey have any guys with a remote mount wrap their exhaust with exhaust wrap and use a turbo blanket to help spool times? I've read online that wrapping the exhuast is supposed to help tremendously with spool time but just wanted to see if anyone has done it on their camaro yet. I will spend this afternoon wrapping my exhaust so I'll post any differences I notice later tonight or this afternoon.
|
|
07-03-2011, 10:25 AM | #2 |
I managed to wrap the exhaust cat back and only the turbo side from the h-pipe back. I also wrapped the turbine housing on the turbo. Once warmed up the car spools about 500-1000 rpms faster at part throttle. At full throttle, the turbo starts to spool at the same rpm but I build full boost within 200rpm instead of having to build it over about 500-1000rpm. This mod seems like it was worth the $80 of wrap and coating and 2 hours of labor (couldve been faster if I wrapped with the exhaust off the car). I used 100ft of wrap.
|
|
07-03-2011, 02:15 PM | #3 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
IPF supercharger kit, IPF tune, SW LT's, R. Tech HFC's, ARK DT-S catback, SS Brembo brake upgrade, BC Racing adjustable coilovers, Hurst STS, Pfadt rear arm package, Pfadt adjustable sways & end links, Pfadt diff bushings, BMR rear cradle full kit blk bezels,SS diffuser, Innovate gauges.
|
|
07-05-2011, 08:01 AM | #4 |
It's supposed to keep the heat in the exhaust and since the air is hotter the air velocity will be higher. More velocity, faster spool I think. Thats what I read anyways, but whatever the explanation is, wrapping the exhaust does increase spool.
|
|
07-08-2011, 07:10 PM | #5 |
Drives: RJT 2LT RS Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 250
|
This sounds really interesting, but that would be one hell of a wrap job. I was thinking about getting long tubes with a cat delete to reduce the time it tasks to spool. If I go that route, maybe I'll think about wrapping when I do that.
Sent from my DROIDX using Tapatalk |
07-08-2011, 10:09 PM | #6 | |
Quote:
If you do get the longtubes, I've read that its recommended to wrap those with remote systems. Most people I read about lost spool when the only mod change was going from stock to longtubes (going catless might make up for the loss not sure ). It has something to due with slowing down the exhaust because of the design of longtubes I believe. However, some guys got their spool back after wrapping them while enjoying more hp. When you put the headers on take the rest of the exhaust off and wrap everything since part of the exhaust will be disconnected anyways. It should be really easy with everything off. Let me know how it goes if you do! |
||
07-11-2011, 05:07 PM | #7 |
Slow Turtle
|
The physics of this are impossible.
|
07-12-2011, 08:43 AM | #8 |
Well I don't know what to say, my spool time decreased by that amount and the only mod was wrapping the exhaust and turbo . When I refer to part throttle it's from 25% to 75%. If the physics are impossible (Please explain why I would love to learn new info) maybe wrapping my exhaust did something else like partially covering an unknown exhaust leak or something?
Last edited by Pt_killa; 07-12-2011 at 09:00 AM. |
|
07-20-2011, 04:47 PM | #9 |
Drives: 2010 Cyber Grey Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Ga
Posts: 703
|
I never knock someone who has done the work. So I tend to lean towards you getting a performance gain. Answer his question... Why are the physics impossible?
|
07-22-2011, 07:34 AM | #10 |
Slow Turtle
|
Because the amount of heat required to drop spool time by 1000rpm is insurmountable. It simply isnt possible.
|
07-22-2011, 07:48 AM | #11 |
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,129
|
I would have to see the equations for this (he did say 500-1000 BTW). I know that there is quite a bit of difference between the head at the manifolds and the heat at the exhaust tips, so some hit is lost as it travels all the way back to where this turbo is sitting. It would be neat to figure out how much and what the loss would be.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread |
07-22-2011, 09:16 AM | #12 | |
Quote:
|
||
07-28-2011, 12:17 PM | #13 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: CoMo
Posts: 414
|
Something else that it could be is with wrapping the exhaust it might of lowered the harmonics, so the exhaust is vibrating less which is making the turbo more efficient with having slightly less vibrations on the housing of the turbo. So less random drag on the turbo shaft.
__________________
2010 JL Audio
Build Thread: http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=139419 #280 MASTER MECP Certified MECP - Sales, Basic and Advance Certified ASE - 6 electrical certified 10+ years car audio installation, sales and manager |
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Thinking about going 2.5" the entire System | mike.nite | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 12 | 01-11-2011 03:57 PM |
*/* Exhaust and Intake's */* Borla/Magnaflow/ Agency Power/ K&N/ AEM */* | ImportImage | V8 Bolt-Ons & Tunes | 73 | 11-01-2010 10:21 PM |
EXHAUST | Milk 1027 | Wiki | 2 | 03-07-2010 09:20 PM |
Heard exhaust of L99 tonight - OMG!!! | Hylton | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 60 | 03-06-2010 05:03 PM |
New Billy Boat 2010 Camaro Exhaust | Ragin Racin | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 11 | 10-20-2009 06:09 PM |