11-13-2014, 04:01 PM | #15 |
Drives: '11 SW 1LT RS Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Granite Bay, CA
Posts: 717
|
If you want to get creative how about one of these?
http://www.amazon.com/Docooler-Gallo...camping+shower Hang that bad boy above your car, get some longer tubing, and wash away. Obviously water pressure will be weak but so is a bucket. |
11-13-2014, 06:43 PM | #16 | |
Drives: a few Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 507
|
Quote:
My own flow research when working on a filter system for one of my previous employers put the water use in a traditional wash setup somewhere between 6-10 gallons of water per wash being conservative and shutting the water off when not in use and thats with GOOD water pressure. A tank based setup without the use of a pressure washer or something is going to require more water to make up for the lack of pressure generated in order to clean effectively. So filling up in the house and transporting to the car for even that purpose puts the weight of the required water at approximate 8lbs per gallon at 48-80lbs without taking into account storage vessels, pumps, etc. Figure double that if you plan to run a pressure washer so you don't end up starving the pump for water. I guess you could mock up some kind of cart with a 20 gallon tank, pumps, a pressure washer, etc... but at that point is it really worth it anymore? The cost to put something like that together starts to look like what I built back in the 90's on a trailer to do mobile detailing - hardly conducive to the DIY guy just looking for a way to clean a car in the winter. The rinseless process makes so much sense b/c it reduces water run off and thus the potential for ice on the ground around your car if the weather is that cold. It requires less than 5 gallons of water to do, which can easily be transported, and lastly its safe assuming you use some means to dislodge more serious contamination in advance. Not everytime a professional makes a recommendation is it an attempt to sell something, sometimes its just the fact that there is a legitimately superior and simple way to do something. I'm all for new ideas or a fresh approach to something, but transporting water, pumps, etc to do something you can do so much more simply seems like making something more complex for the sake of being complex, not better. A hybrid idea you might consider are the pressurized fertilizer tank sprayers you can purchase at the hardware store. Mix a tank full of a rinseless product at a weak dilution for a pre soak, it won't have the pressure (or the capacity) to rinse an entire car top to bottom, but you could use it to pre-soak lower rockers, front bumper, etc in advance of the full wash. Just a thought.
__________________
1967 C/10 PROJECT TRUCK | DETAILING EXPERT | CRAFT BEER ENTHUSIAST Last edited by DylanVK; 11-14-2014 at 10:41 AM. |
|
11-13-2014, 08:26 PM | #17 | |
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,693
|
Quote:
Quick detailer doesn't work the same, technique wise, as waterless or rinseless wash which take a Gary Dean Method, very much different. There is a use for these products in varying ways, this thread is an excellent example of such. What do YOU suggest this OP do in his situation? To talk about truth... Wasn't it your account that was just recently suspended..
__________________
Detailing is an involuntary obsession.
|
|
11-13-2014, 08:55 PM | #18 |
Drives: 2015 BVM Camaro 1LE (2SS/RS) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 971
|
Great input DylanVK. Thanks! It's nice to here about your experience with it. The pressurized fertilizer tank sounds look a good idea to get a presoak. I'll keep it in mind.
|
11-13-2014, 08:56 PM | #19 |
Drives: a few Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Colorado
Posts: 507
|
There are some pretty bold accusations about product composition here that MIGHT be true for some companies, but not all. There are a number of true waterless washing products on the market that are very different in composition from equivalent detail sprays.
__________________
1967 C/10 PROJECT TRUCK | DETAILING EXPERT | CRAFT BEER ENTHUSIAST |
11-13-2014, 09:21 PM | #20 | ||
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,693
|
Quote:
To make it clear, you can sit here and preach all day about waterless washes. But until you provide evidence, and facts like many of the detailing experts do, then you are just blowing a load of hot air. Quote:
__________________
Detailing is an involuntary obsession.
|
||
11-13-2014, 09:23 PM | #21 |
Obsessed
Drives: 2016 Hyper Blue 2SS RS Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Riverview, FL
Posts: 2,603
|
OP, I am in Fairfax County, VA as well.
Have you considered getting it "hand-washed" at one of the local wash places? Most do it for about $30. I watch them do it, and you can make sure they do it right. If you want to know where, PM me. Jim
__________________
2016 Hyper Blue 2SS |
11-13-2014, 10:16 PM | #22 | |
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,693
|
Quote:
Here's a better example if I'm not getting my point across: Grit-guards. We all use them and they are typically a first recommendation in car care. But when they were released, the inventor didn't just say "Hey throw these things in your buckets and you will get less swirls". Instead, there was the logic behind the application, that it allows debris to settle, less water turbulence to agitate, etc. You're fighting an up-hill battle if you are going to attempt to educate the whole detailing community about the similarities between waterless wash and detail spray. While you may say they are identical, Dylan does rebut saying there are differences. I do trust Dylan on this one. Regardless, it's not so much the idea of them being identical products, rather it should be that there are multiple purposes. Detail spray and waterless wash aren't synonymous terminologies in the detailing world, because both have wildly different techniques. If you are wanting to "shed the light" per se on the similarities, rather than looking at it as double labeling a product, look at it as a multiple use product. Who knows, create your own new terminology for the detailing world that blankets these two techniques. I take no offense to your posts, I enjoy the discussion.
__________________
Detailing is an involuntary obsession.
|
|
11-13-2014, 10:17 PM | #23 |
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,693
|
He's looking to stay away from swirls. Commercial car washes will definitely do the opposite.
__________________
Detailing is an involuntary obsession.
|
11-13-2014, 10:44 PM | #24 | |
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,693
|
Quote:
I very much understand your point about DS and WW. Sure, you can probably use a DS as a WW, but DS isn't labeled as such nor is the technique defined when using a DS. DS is spray, wipe. WW is bucket, product, microfiber, wipe and dry. I think you are missing what I'm saying with this DS/WW, I'm not arguing with you about the chemical make-up between the two (you and Dylan can have that discussion as I have no idea), I'm saying that the names are not synonymous in the techniques you use.
__________________
Detailing is an involuntary obsession.
|
|
11-13-2014, 10:46 PM | #25 |
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,693
|
From what I have read and researching in the detailing community, foam is just there for cling factor. The lubricity and car soap does the rest of the suspension.
__________________
Detailing is an involuntary obsession.
|
11-13-2014, 11:36 PM | #26 |
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LT/RS Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,693
|
I'm sorry but I don't know how else or how many times to explain to you what I'm asking. You lost a sale from me because of the selling point you are giving is just a "trust me" it cures cancer without any type of evidence to convince me otherwise. I'm not a sheep... Very much a sheepdog.
Best, Jordan
__________________
Detailing is an involuntary obsession.
|
11-14-2014, 05:22 AM | #27 |
Drives: 2015 BVM Camaro 1LE (2SS/RS) Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Leesburg, VA
Posts: 971
|
I have thought about doing that but every time I drive past a place like that and see the way most of them wash a car I cringe. They run around rubbing the car with a large microfiber to dry it. Life as a perfectionist can be rough...hah. Not to mention $30 is pretty expensive when you are talking about 2 cars. I would prefer to wash my cars myself and come up with a decent system that will get me through several winters up here. Where is the place that you take your car for the hand wash? I may try it if it gets painfully cold. Also, do you know of a coin op power washer car wash that's open during the winter?
|
11-14-2014, 08:43 AM | #28 |
Drives: 14 Camaro 1LE,328i, and some Hondas Join Date: May 2014
Location: Virginia
Posts: 799
|
Op, whenever I travel, I just find a local self-service wash and just use their water. I bring my own buckets, products, etc. Sucks because of the cold sometimes, but it usually works out for me. I refuse to let anyone touch my paint. I detail on the side and most production detailers I've seen in the area do crap work.
|
|
|
|
|