Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
dave@hennessey
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-01-2013, 06:17 PM   #1
kwamonster
 
Drives: 2010 IOM SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 21
Does anyone have a TSP AFM3 Cam?

Hello I was wondering if anyone had purchased the TSP AFM-3 cam and was it worth it? here is the link below. I have the 2010 auto L99

http://texas-speed.com/p-789-texas-s...-camshaft.aspx
kwamonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 06:29 PM   #2
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
I haven't seen anyone with that particular cam but we have a member that has Mast stage 3 VVT cam. He's putting down just under 500whp with an insane tq curve.

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...hlight=vvt+LS3
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 07:02 PM   #3
Irnwkrkev
 
Irnwkrkev's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami
Posts: 528
Interesting! I wonder if anyone has dyno'd any of these cams yet. Seems like they would be a budget approach with not having to remove the cylinder heads. With the already fast times from L99's with tires, converters, and bolt ons, I wonder what type of improvement this cam would make?
Irnwkrkev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 07:19 PM   #4
litle88
V8 Lounge member #2
 
litle88's Avatar
 
Drives: 2001 Ws6
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Burbank,IL
Posts: 6,373
I have an L99 and worry about those damn lifters even on a stock cam! Let alone a slightly bigger cam. If you want to keep vvt that's cool but you defiantly need to remove AFM and its junk parts. It's just not worth it really.
__________________
2001 ws6, 40k miles, Ls3 416 stroker, short block built by PER the rest by me. LPE Ls3 heads milled to 12-1 comp, FAST 102, NW 102, kooks 2", dual DMH cutouts, Magnaflow C/B, BTR cam + springs. Full UMI suspension.
litle88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-01-2013, 07:54 PM   #5
siriusdish

 
Drives: 2010 Camaro L99
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Erie PA
Posts: 1,226
Did not know they had a AFM 3 cam, VVT 3 here, Mods in Sig
__________________
2010 L99
vararam intake, Vmax TB,Vmax Intake,TSP VVT 3 Cam,TSP underdrive pulley,Yank 3600,TM Cooler,ARH 2", High Flow cats, X-pipe, GM Pro mufflers, RX Catch Can,160 stat, BMR Trailing,toe,Cradle insert, Diff. Bushings, End links, Spohn-LCA's (Touring)Wheel spacer's. 422 rwhp Mustang Dyno http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AaFNAhCL7Os
siriusdish is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 12:22 AM   #6
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irnwkrkev View Post
Interesting! I wonder if anyone has dyno'd any of these cams yet. Seems like they would be a budget approach with not having to remove the cylinder heads. With the already fast times from L99's with tires, converters, and bolt ons, I wonder what type of improvement this cam would make?
Oh you'd still have to pull the heads to do it properly. You need to swap out the AFM lifters with at least LS3 ones and do the rest of the normal upgrade stuff. For longevity and max power, you need to ditch the AFM crap but keep the VVT.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 06:04 AM   #7
Irnwkrkev
 
Irnwkrkev's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami
Posts: 528
^ Read the first post or click on the link. This is about TSP's AFM cam. It keeps AFM functional therefore you don't have to remove the heads.
Irnwkrkev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:24 AM   #8
biggerisbetter
lll
 
biggerisbetter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro ss L99
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: new orleans
Posts: 1,176
dont do it. i tried it and it was lower numbers than stock and the drive train was very loud. do yourself a favor and call lethal racing and talk to shawn or nick about thier prowler cam
__________________
PERFORMANCE
DYNATECH LT 1 7/8 HEADERS, CATLESS MID PIPES, CORSA CATBACK, CAI. COLD AIR INTAKE w/ SCOOP, 1LE 3:91 GEARS, LETHAL RACING PROWLER CAM, LETHAL RACING DYNO TUNE, ENERGY CRADDLE BUSHING INSERTS, PADDLE SHIFTER RELOCATE KIT, 449RWHP/438TQ
APPEARANCE
COPO HOOD, ZL1 SPOILER, SLP BLACKOUT PANEL, PLASTI DIP WHEELS, HERITAGE GRILL, RETRO SS EMBLEMS, WEATHER TECH FLOOR MATS, ORANGE STITCHING
biggerisbetter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:42 AM   #9
Kelly@PCMofNC

 
Drives: 2010 RS/SS
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mooresville, NC
Posts: 959
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irnwkrkev View Post
^ Read the first post or click on the link. This is about TSP's AFM cam. It keeps AFM functional therefore you don't have to remove the heads.
This seems good in theory, until you factor in the failure rate of the stock L99 lifters. It's just not worth it in my opinion. I would rather pull the heads and swap lifters for peace of mind - it really doesn't end up costing that much more.
Kelly@PCMofNC is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 01:39 PM   #10
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by Irnwkrkev View Post
^ Read the first post or click on the link. This is about TSP's AFM cam. It keeps AFM functional therefore you don't have to remove the heads.
Yes I know you don't HAVE to swap lifters but it's HIGHLY recommended if you want to reduce the chance of redoing it all again. As Kelly stated, there are many instances of AFM lifters failing on stock cars so it only makes sense to swap them on cam swap. There is absolutely no reason to keep AFM on a car that you're doing a cam swap on. Disabling AFM is one of the first things people do to their L99's.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 05:52 PM   #11
Irnwkrkev
 
Irnwkrkev's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SS/RS LS3
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Miami
Posts: 528
If that were the case no one in their right mind would buy the tiny afm cam being discussed and then disable the afm. I just stated that it's interesting.... I own an LS3.

According to one post they lost power. I'd like to know if TSP has any dyno or real world reliability results.
Irnwkrkev is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:06 PM   #12
kwamonster
 
Drives: 2010 IOM SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Baltimore, Maryland
Posts: 21
My main concern is i didnt want to remove the heads. They claim that they are safe with the stock lifters. The cost wasn't the problem i just didnt want to go into the motor anymore than was necessary. But if it wasn't worth going through for this cam i would get a bigger cam all together and change the lifters. there was a video on youtube with someone having the the afm 1 and got about 50 more rwhp at this link
kwamonster is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 08:42 PM   #13
1989GTA
 
Drives: 1989 GTA Trans Am
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Cypress, California
Posts: 610
As stated above it sounds like your best bet is to call TSP and see what dyno results they have and then make your decision.
1989GTA is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-02-2013, 10:02 PM   #14
axis
Search Ninja
 
axis's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Central Ark
Posts: 7,183
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwamonster View Post
My main concern is i didnt want to remove the heads. They claim that they are safe with the stock lifters. The cost wasn't the problem i just didnt want to go into the motor anymore than was necessary. But if it wasn't worth going through for this cam i would get a bigger cam all together and change the lifters.
We aren't trying to sell you anything, just trying to tell you what we see. The AFM lifters are most DEFINITELY the weak link. If you want to go through the cost of doing a cam, it would be in your best interest to upgrade as much as you can in the heads the first time. This will give you the best chance of running problem free.
__________________
2010 Black 2SS/RS A6
Halltech CF 102 fed
GPI modded intake manifold
Bo (knows) White ported TB
Kooks LT's/ Dynomax VT
Pfadted (springs/sways)
Dyno tuned by Rhino and GPI

I once parallel parked a train.
axis is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Tags
afm, cam, l99, tsp


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:06 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.