12-16-2014, 03:57 PM | #15 | |
JT Synergy RS/2SS
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
|
|
12-16-2014, 03:59 PM | #16 |
JT Synergy RS/2SS
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
|
I have been advised to get BMR rear trailing arms - spherical (and outer bushings), BMR adjustable toe rods with rod ends and BMR upper control arm mounts.
Thoughts. |
12-16-2014, 04:14 PM | #17 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
I would say my ride quality is much stiffer now.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
12-16-2014, 04:21 PM | #18 |
JT Synergy RS/2SS
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
|
That's what makes me nervous. Did you go with all polyurethane bushings or spherical. Sounds like spherical is quite a bit more harsh? Just trying to decide if this (BMR suspension) is a "needed" upgrade? Right now I have a perfectly quiet and comfortable car on the street and she performs quite well at the track. Not sure if I'm willing to lose any street manners for (very little) track improvement?
|
12-16-2014, 04:22 PM | #19 |
Drives: Race Car Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Seffner, FL
Posts: 6,226
|
If you are wanting a nice "quiet" ride, as you mentioned above, skip the spherical bearings and rod ends. Instead, get the components with polyurethane bushings. TCA026 Trailing Arms, and TR003 Toe Rods. I'd still recommend the BK039 Rear Upper Control Arm Bushings. These will still improve your track performance, but they will have less NVH!!!
|
12-16-2014, 04:24 PM | #20 | |
JT Synergy RS/2SS
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
|
|
12-16-2014, 04:41 PM | #21 |
Drives: 2011camaro SS Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Allen, Tx
Posts: 2,202
|
BMR upgrades are a good insurance for your driveline just in case you are getting some wheelhop. I agree with others in the suggestion you might need a little more converter. You should be able to lower that 60 considerably with your HP level.
The other issue is you could be slightly spinning your tires and not realize it causing your 60ft to be on the low side. If that is the case, That could be anything from tires, to track prep, to burnout technique...etc. if it were me I'd do both BMR suspension AND a 2800 converter! |
12-16-2014, 05:09 PM | #22 | |
JT Synergy RS/2SS
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
|
|
12-16-2014, 05:16 PM | #23 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
Poly: http://www.superchevy.com/how-to/eng...asses-part-2/#
Spherical rod end stuff can be clanky, I've had that stuff in past cars.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
12-16-2014, 05:24 PM | #24 |
Drives: Chevys at the limit Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: SLC, UT
Posts: 9,621
|
Just because you are not getting wheel hop, does not mean bushings are not deflecting causing toe-in under load. As stated, go for Trailing arms with outer bushings, Toe links, Subframe bushings and upper control arm bushings. After that, a good alignment with 0 toe and as close to 0 camber as possible will get you in the 1.5's.
Best of luck and feel free to call, PM or email me anytime with questions. Best regards, Tyler 888-308-6007 |
12-16-2014, 05:31 PM | #25 |
'It's an experiment'
Drives: [COTW 2/09/15] '11 GPI LSA SC Z/LE Join Date: May 2014
Location: Dallas TX
Posts: 8,694
|
I have the BMR spherical ends for both trailing arms and toe rods in mine. I notice a bit more noise and stiffer ride but I personally don't mind that. The car really feels like it's on rails and that is what I wanted. Wife is good with the ride and believe me, she would let me know ;o). Talk to Tyler - he'll get you what you need.
-Don |
12-16-2014, 05:57 PM | #26 | |
JT Synergy RS/2SS
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
|
Quote:
|
|
12-16-2014, 06:44 PM | #27 |
JT Synergy RS/2SS
Drives: 2011 Camaro RS/2SS (L99) Synergy Join Date: May 2013
Location: Hager City, WI
Posts: 697
|
Perfect. Thanks guys!
|
|
|
|
|