06-20-2012, 11:59 PM | #29 | |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 97
|
Quote:
I really hate it when vendors answer a different question than the one I ask... |
|
06-21-2012, 09:00 AM | #30 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 247
|
I do run the Texas Mile, and from what I can determine more air is packed in the engine compartment than can get out at speed. On my car, both front wheel well liners were driven back so that they contacted the tires. I have since reinforced the front bottom edges with aluminum, and repaced some of the plasctic clips with rivnuts and screws.
|
06-21-2012, 09:05 AM | #31 |
Drives: 2012 Camaro 2SS 45th Anniversary Ed Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,220
|
What would be the affects at high speed...will it throw off stability? Just brain storming.
__________________
2012 Camaro 2SS 45th Anniversary Edition - No longer owned: 2010 Camaro 2LT, 1993 Camaro Z-28
|
06-21-2012, 09:46 AM | #32 | |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 97
|
Quote:
As is the mailslot mod would probably cause more drag since closed, air will mostly flow right over it and with this mod the slot is opened up to flow right into the hood latch & the hood seal rubber behind that (Yeh, I don't know why either). |
|
06-21-2012, 09:53 AM | #33 | |
The Mark of Excellence
Drives: 2010 ABM 1SS RS LS3 Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Smallest State in the Union
Posts: 8,690
|
Quote:
Keep the ideas/discussion moving.
__________________
BMR, CAI, DynoMax, Elite Eng., Hurst, Jannetty, Clear Image Headers & Hi Flow cats, Jet Hot, LSR, TSW, VMax, Vredestein Last edited by PAUL SS; 06-21-2012 at 03:52 PM. |
|
06-21-2012, 10:44 AM | #34 | |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 97
|
Quote:
|
|
06-21-2012, 10:49 AM | #35 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 247
|
The drag increase is exponential. I got to 150 in the first half mile and just 175 at the mile. I tried removing the air seal at the cowl under the hood, couldn't tell any difference.
|
06-21-2012, 11:03 AM | #36 | |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 97
|
Quote:
Oh, and BTW the overall drag is actually worse. While the aero drag is increasing exponentially the rolling resistance continues to increase on a liniar curve as well. |
|
06-21-2012, 11:10 AM | #37 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 247
|
That's in idea.
I have lowered the car an inch-that should help some. I have also pullied up the Vortech, and getting a race gas only tune. I'm shooting for 180 this November. |
06-21-2012, 11:49 AM | #38 |
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: New Mexico
Posts: 97
|
Is E85 worthwhile where you're at? Kills your mpg but if it's cheap there it has way more power than gas and runs cooler. Alot of race cars are going that way even here where E85 is well over $4/gal. That's way cheaper than $10+/gal. for race fuel. I don't remember who but there's at least one guy on here that's supercharged running E85. Do a search and see what's involved. Might be cheaper, faster & more fun in the long run.
|
06-21-2012, 11:57 AM | #39 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 247
|
I don't believe E85 is available in that area, besides my injectors and fuel system wouldn't support the required fuel flow. I also have purely political objections to E85 and govt. subsidized, forced ethanol use in our fuels.
The cost of 10-15 gallons of race gas a couple times a year isn't prohibitive. What would help the most down there would be cool dry air and no wind. Last edited by JustaCamaro; 06-21-2012 at 12:37 PM. |
06-21-2012, 12:29 PM | #40 | |
crazier than a coconut
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,547
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
06-24-2012, 06:07 PM | #41 |
Buick 455 Fan
Drives: 1970 Buick, 2012 1SS LS3 Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Boston MA
Posts: 5,957
|
Hi
E85 has less power than 'straight' gas- about 66% of the power. It has a higher octane You can design an engine (or tune it) to take advantage of that higher octane and see some results, but just using E85? No sir, I don't believe you'll be reducing your ETs I like the idea of the mail-slot doing something. I'm an old time musclecar guy and I like my 'Ram-Air', even if there's no real ram effect at all. I do know that finally finding a factory ram-air setup for a Buick GS455 and installing it in my car required enriching the carb at idle and new jets. but the question does exist: did I raise tangible performance, or just burn more gas? Jury has been out on that for some time!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|