Stock LSX376-B15, anyway to increase compression ratio

[Supercharged SS]

[QUOTE=jrpxxii;6687352]

Originally Posted by Supercharged SS

Id like to see your car on the dyno with the nitrous shot to see what you are REALLY making

I thought it made 750. Ted said corrected it was 732.

680 with no nitrous.

[Fiftydriver]

[QUOTE=Supercharged SS;6687387]

Originally Posted by jrpxxii

I thought it made 750. Ted said corrected it was 732.

680 with no nitrous.

Ya that sucks!!! Not sure how you can drive your car around without being embarrased!!! LOL

I have a long way to go until I am even close to your 680.

So riddle me this, if the Maggie can not feed a larger displacement engine to get HP level into the 700 RWHP range, would it not be better to go with a smaller displacement motor built to the nuts and with a displacement where the Maggie could still make some good boost numbers?

I have pretty much decided on a Livernois 416 Pro series short block with roughly 10.7:1 CR. Running around 510 to 540 rwhp right now depending on which tune and what octane fuel I am running so anything 650 rwhp or over will be a big boost in performance.

[Supercharged SS]

[QUOTE=Fiftydriver;6687868]

Originally Posted by Supercharged SS

Ya that sucks!!! Not sure how you can drive your car around without being embarrased!!! LOL

I have a long way to go until I am even close to your 680.

So riddle me this, if the Maggie can not feed a larger displacement engine to get HP level into the 700 RWHP range, would it not be better to go with a smaller displacement motor built to the nuts and with a displacement where the Maggie could still make some good boost numbers?

I have pretty much decided on a Livernois 416 Pro series short block with roughly 10.7:1 CR. Running around 510 to 540 rwhp right now depending on which tune and what octane fuel I am running so anything 650 rwhp or over will be a big boost in performance.

I drive the car with a ski mask on to hide my shame.

I don't care what anyone else has to say but every 416 Maggie camaro I've seen run at the track is my cars bitch. Ok, so you squeak a little more power. Gd for you. The tvs seems to like the 376 for optimum efficiency and production. The blower itself is now limiting the power.

[Fiftydriver]

Well, that makes the decision crystal clear!!! LOL

[Unavowed]

Originally Posted by Fiftydriver

So riddle me this, if the Maggie can not feed a larger displacement engine to get HP level into the 700 RWHP range, would it not be better to go with a smaller displacement motor built to the nuts and with a displacement where the Maggie could still make some good boost numbers?

I have pretty much decided on a Livernois 416 Pro series short block with roughly 10.7:1 CR. Running around 510 to 540 rwhp right now depending on which tune and what octane fuel I am running so anything 650 rwhp or over will be a big boost in performance.

Depends on your goals. Personally I would rather have big cubes, which may limit boost, and make up the difference with compression. I don't live at the track, so for street driving I think it will be great. Seems like you and I have similar plans with our builds. If someone is trying to build a track car for the best e.t. possible, it seems Jamie's car is the gold standard.

[Fiftydriver]

Originally Posted by Unavowed

Depends on your goals. Personally I would rather have big cubes, which may limit boost, and make up the difference with compression. I don't live at the track, so for street driving I think it will be great. Seems like you and I have similar plans with our builds. If someone is trying to build a track car for the best e.t. possible, it seems Jamie's car is the gold standard.

Ya, street performance is far more important to me which is why I am leaning toward a 416.

[Ray@RDS]

Originally Posted by Andy@Livernois

Remember though, engine size means nothing to a supercharger. Boost is only a measure of restriction, not total airflow. A 2300 supercharger can only move x amount of airflow, which will make x amount of HP, no matter how large of an engine is underneath of it. Factor in the auto, and you are talking about a combination that would make ~650, but 700 is a stretch as the blower just cannot move enough air to be efficient at that level.

I disagree with parts of this , in the current design ( out of the box) from Magnuson yes! With the addition of porting the lower tub elevating the intercooler while isolating it with phenolic s and increasing the throttle body size additional cfm is found by removing restriction...
I just put down 678 rwhp and 770 rwtq @ 8 psi on 91 octane
Using a stock 6 rib drive front and a 10 rib rear overdrive
Belt slip is clearly an issue on this combination, however it does clearly show the potential of a 2300 on a properly designed 7.0 specifically for the tvs2300.
I currently own 2 of the first 5 tvs2300 released to the public back in early 2009.
Pushing the limits and raising the bar of the TVS2300 is how RDS was created

[H-E]

Originally Posted by Fiftydriver

Ya, street performance is far more important to me which is why I am leaning toward a 416.

I have a 454 /2300 combo and make 800rwhp on pump gas..You can make power a lot of ways...CR is the key to big cubes and Andy has that with his 416...

[Chris@Livernois]

Originally Posted by Unreal

Which is why I love turbos. 12psi, stock l99, no heads, no cam, no headers, no cais, no tensioners. 680rwhp/740rwtq.

Andy@Livernois, who is the person to talk to about being a dealer? Dave?

Yes Dave does our business to business sales. He would be the one to contact about becoming a dealer.

[Unavowed]

Originally Posted by H-E

I have a 454 /2300 combo and make 800rwhp on pump gas..You can make power a lot of ways...

What does the torque curve look like?