Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics > Engine | Exhaust | Bolt-On | Drivetrain Modifications


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 09-10-2017, 10:26 PM   #15
Can'tHave2MuchHP
 
Can'tHave2MuchHP's Avatar
 
Drives: Fast
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by incon3037r View Post
So my final numbers are listed on the dyno sheet below. I was hoping for more, but considering my baseline was low and the blower was only making 8 psi with the 9.55 lower and running 91 octane, I don't feel too bad. I'm sure if I add a 2.75" upper, port the snout w/ along with a larger throttle body, I can pick up some additional boost and hit 650+.

You should be making 13-14 PSI of boost on that. Stock engines can make 8 PSI. Time to trouble shoot IMO. It could be something easy, check the bypass valve (Search it up on google) adjustment. Or it could be something hard, leaking supercharger.

609 RWHP is relatively easily achievable with pulleys, intake, and headers.
Can'tHave2MuchHP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2017, 05:40 AM   #16
incon3037r
GMHIC
 
incon3037r's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1/2008 Pontiac G8 GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can'tHave2MuchHP View Post
You should be making 13-14 PSI of boost on that. Stock engines can make 8 PSI. Time to trouble shoot IMO. It could be something easy, check the bypass valve (Search it up on google) adjustment. Or it could be something hard, leaking supercharger.

609 RWHP is relatively easily achievable with pulleys, intake, and headers.
I've seen similar numbers as mine from other members with similar modifications using a 2.55 upper which should produce around the same psi as my 9.55 lower on a stock motor.

I also thought my psi was low, but figured I lost boost from less restrictions. They list the 9.55" as making an additional 4-4.5 psi over stock, which would be around 13 psi. At the same time, I've heard headers cause you to loose 2 psi or so and with the cam, no cats, cat back and cooler intake charge, I would think I'd possibly lose another 2 psi, putting me between 8-9 psi. It probably also doesn't help that my baseline was on the low side. Had it been higher, I'm sure my final numbers would of also reflected it.

Others members also make more boost and power than I did with the use of higher octane fuel and both upper and lower pulley, such as 2.55/8.6 combination. I figure if I add a 2.85 upper to my 9.55 lower then I should hopefully be around a similar 13-14 psi, which should hopefully net me in the 650+ range on 91 octane.

I'll definitely look into the by pass adjustment, boost leaks and cam overlap to make sure I'm not losing any boost.
__________________
Pontiac G8 GT- ProCharger F-1D, Treadstone TR1235 FMIC, Kooks 1 7/8" LTH,Corsa catback, New Era (228/240) cam, Yella Terra 1.7 Rockers, GMPP LS3 CNC heads, Aeromotive A1000, FAST fuel rails, FIC 1000cc injectors - 762 RWHP/646 LBFT tuned @ 11psi on E85 using HP Tuners
Camaro ZL1- Stainless Works 2" LTH, Corsa catback, RSC PDx cam, ID 1050x injectors, DSX fuel kit, New Era 4.5" intake, BTR springs/pushrods, AFCO heat exchanger, New Era expansion tank, Innovators West balancer, Metco 9.55" lower - 609 RWHP/591 LBFT tuned @ 8psi on 91 octane using HP Tuners
incon3037r is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2017, 08:16 AM   #17
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can'tHave2MuchHP View Post
You should be making 13-14 PSI of boost on that. Stock engines can make 8 PSI. Time to trouble shoot IMO. It could be something easy, check the bypass valve (Search it up on google) adjustment. Or it could be something hard, leaking supercharger.

609 RWHP is relatively easily achievable with pulleys, intake, and headers.
This.

Quote:
Originally Posted by incon3037r View Post
I've seen similar numbers as mine from other members with similar modifications using a 2.55 upper which should produce around the same psi as my 9.55 lower on a stock motor.

I also thought my psi was low, but figured I lost boost from less restrictions. They list the 9.55" as making an additional 4-4.5 psi over stock, which would be around 13 psi. At the same time, I've heard headers cause you to loose 2 psi or so and with the cam, no cats, cat back and cooler intake charge, I would think I'd possibly lose another 2 psi, putting me between 8-9 psi. It probably also doesn't help that my baseline was on the low side. Had it been higher, I'm sure my final numbers would of also reflected it.

Others members also make more boost and power than I did with the use of higher octane fuel and both upper and lower pulley, such as 2.55/8.6 combination. I figure if I add a 2.85 upper to my 9.55 lower then I should hopefully be around a similar 13-14 psi, which should hopefully net me in the 650+ range on 91 octane.

I'll definitely look into the by pass adjustment, boost leaks and cam overlap to make sure I'm not losing any boost.

18% should produce exactly the same boost weather it is upper or lower.

Headers only decrease boost between .5 and 1 psi

Air intakes increase boost by same amount so it becomes a wash.

Cams will lower boost about 1-2 psi.

Belt slip is very common with upper pulley changes.

I never change the upper in any of our power upgrade packages.

Upper pulley changes are a last resort change when maxing out the blower.

Ted
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com

Last edited by JANNETTYRACING; 09-12-2017 at 11:46 AM.
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2017, 11:37 AM   #18
Can'tHave2MuchHP
 
Can'tHave2MuchHP's Avatar
 
Drives: Fast
Join Date: Mar 2015
Location: Michigan
Posts: 3,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by incon3037r View Post
I've seen similar numbers as mine from other members with similar modifications using a 2.55 upper which should produce around the same psi as my 9.55 lower on a stock motor.

I also thought my psi was low, but figured I lost boost from less restrictions. They list the 9.55" as making an additional 4-4.5 psi over stock, which would be around 13 psi. At the same time, I've heard headers cause you to loose 2 psi or so and with the cam, no cats, cat back and cooler intake charge, I would think I'd possibly lose another 2 psi, putting me between 8-9 psi. It probably also doesn't help that my baseline was on the low side. Had it been higher, I'm sure my final numbers would of also reflected it.

Others members also make more boost and power than I did with the use of higher octane fuel and both upper and lower pulley, such as 2.55/8.6 combination. I figure if I add a 2.85 upper to my 9.55 lower then I should hopefully be around a similar 13-14 psi, which should hopefully net me in the 650+ range on 91 octane.

I'll definitely look into the by pass adjustment, boost leaks and cam overlap to make sure I'm not losing any boost.
No, you're definitely not going from 13 PSI down to 8-9 because of a Cam and Headers.

2.55" or 9.17" lower is 18% overdrive.

You however have a 9.55" which is 22.5% overdrive, and therefore should make more power and boost than a 2.55" upper which is, again, 18%.

As mentioned by me and Ted, your power is definitely pretty low, and though you could blame it on a dyno, the other red flag is the boost, again really low. A 18% pulley, intake, headers, and ported blower should make that much power on 93.

Adding a 2.75" or 2.85" upper pulley with a 9.55" is a wonkey setup, I'd recommend listening to Ted and sticking with the 9.55" only or switching that 9.55" for a 10" or switching the 9.55" out for a 9.17" and adding a 2.55" upper.

Again, you shouldn't need any more supercharger over drive than 22.5% to hit 650 RWHP. Your setup should be making around there. If you were to add more pulley and porting you should nearly hit 700, or just under. As you push beyond 650 RWHP, you're going to be hitting the limits of 93 octane and you'll need to look at Meth or E85, or running on Torco.
Can'tHave2MuchHP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 09-12-2017, 05:27 PM   #19
incon3037r
GMHIC
 
incon3037r's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro ZL1/2008 Pontiac G8 GT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 137
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
This.




18% should produce exactly the same boost weather it is upper or lower.

Headers only decrease boost between .5 and 1 psi

Air intakes increase boost by same amount so it becomes a wash.

Cams will lower boost about 1-2 psi.

Belt slip is very common with upper pulley changes.

I never change the upper in any of our power upgrade packages.

Upper pulley changes are a last resort change when maxing out the blower.

Ted
Quote:
Originally Posted by Can'tHave2MuchHP View Post
No, you're definitely not going from 13 PSI down to 8-9 because of a Cam and Headers.

2.55" or 9.17" lower is 18% overdrive.

You however have a 9.55" which is 22.5% overdrive, and therefore should make more power and boost than a 2.55" upper which is, again, 18%.

As mentioned by me and Ted, your power is definitely pretty low, and though you could blame it on a dyno, the other red flag is the boost, again really low. A 18% pulley, intake, headers, and ported blower should make that much power on 93.

Adding a 2.75" or 2.85" upper pulley with a 9.55" is a wonkey setup, I'd recommend listening to Ted and sticking with the 9.55" only or switching that 9.55" for a 10" or switching the 9.55" out for a 9.17" and adding a 2.55" upper.

Again, you shouldn't need any more supercharger over drive than 22.5% to hit 650 RWHP. Your setup should be making around there. If you were to add more pulley and porting you should nearly hit 700, or just under. As you push beyond 650 RWHP, you're going to be hitting the limits of 93 octane and you'll need to look at Meth or E85, or running on Torco.
I appreciate the help guys and trust what you're telling me. Ted's post are the reason I chose to go with the 9.55" in the first place. I'm definitely going to address the issue and figure out whats going on, since my low 91 octane and elevation aren't the issue. Other than the by pass adjustment and possible supercharger leakage, is there anything else I should look for ie; belt slip too much overlap?
__________________
Pontiac G8 GT- ProCharger F-1D, Treadstone TR1235 FMIC, Kooks 1 7/8" LTH,Corsa catback, New Era (228/240) cam, Yella Terra 1.7 Rockers, GMPP LS3 CNC heads, Aeromotive A1000, FAST fuel rails, FIC 1000cc injectors - 762 RWHP/646 LBFT tuned @ 11psi on E85 using HP Tuners
Camaro ZL1- Stainless Works 2" LTH, Corsa catback, RSC PDx cam, ID 1050x injectors, DSX fuel kit, New Era 4.5" intake, BTR springs/pushrods, AFCO heat exchanger, New Era expansion tank, Innovators West balancer, Metco 9.55" lower - 609 RWHP/591 LBFT tuned @ 8psi on 91 octane using HP Tuners
incon3037r is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:13 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.