Official 1/4 Mile (V6) 2010+ Camaro Fast List

[DarkneSS]

Originally Posted by racergirl

Third time's a charm Same 2013 6 speed auto LFX Camaro. Front tires were at 42 psi and rear tires at 38 psi. Other passes were 13.970 @ 101.03, 14.031 @ 100.65, and 14.045 @ 100.14. We finally did it! Many thanks to the staff at State Capitol for doing a great job of prepping the track. Big thanks to some of y'all on here for the tips. And BIGGEST thanks to my dad, could not have done this without you

Tires used on the pass: BF Goodrich Radial T/A's
Performance Mods (if any): None
Transmission: 6 speed auto
Category submitted for: Bone Stock
R/T...……. .207
60'.........…. 2.083
330'......….. 5.892
660'......….. 8.990
660’ mph… 79.58
1000'......…. 11.680
1320'......…. 13.955
1320’ mph… 100.77
Name of the track: State Capitol Raceway
Date of pass: November 24, 2013
Weather conditions: 54*, sunny, 47% humidity, DA -700

Right Lane

Lol 2.0 with a "bone stock" car with BF Goodrichs at 38 PSI? 101 trap speed? Doesn't the 2LS have the 2.73 gears too? My old LLT was definitely making more crank than a stock LFX and DEFINITELY 5-10whp more and I trapped 100-101.

Bone stock

[DarkneSS]

Originally Posted by racergirl

Car #22

For Mr.Non-believer, this car is as bone stock as they come. My most recent passes last Sunday. Or for any non-believer, for that matter. I was born into drag racing; I'm no rookie. My dad has 70' Buick GSX runs mid tens and my grandpa owns a 99' pro charged Camaro SS which also runs mid tens. On these passes my dad and I were pushing for our thirteens, but the DA was not as optimistic as the drag times calculator. My dad's friend brought a weather station to check the DA at the track and it was about -500ft, and we also had 20-25 mph winds against the car. Good car, good weather, good driver. Some cars just run better than others

Ah thought so track error all the way around. 1.8 60' yet ran the same time.

Sorry but just look at all the other auto cars. Even ones with full bolt ons barely run low 14s. There is just no way a stock 2LS can crack 13s lol lets be real here. Absolutely track error OR you have a factory freak and need to get the car dynoed. The slips are the evidence.

[racergirl]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

Ah thought so track error all the way around. 1.8 60' yet ran the same time.

Sorry but just look at all the other auto cars. Even ones with full bolt ons barely run low 14s. There is just no way a stock 2LS can crack 13s lol lets be real here. Absolutely track error OR you have a factory freak and need to get the car dynoed. The slips are the evidence.

First off the 2LS has 2.92 gears not 2.73 gears. Anyone who knows cars, or Camaros for that matter, would know that. State Capitol Raceway in Baton Rouge is a real dragstrip where they really prep the track. On the timeslip in question that shows the 1.84 60', look at the 60' on car #13; his front half of the timeslip was messed up too, no way that the 5.0 Mustang went 1.36 60'. The front half of the slip was messed up for both cars. Just look at the other timeslips; they all add up. $500 for anyone that can prove my car isn't bone stock, come down to State Capitol or No Problem.

P.S. How much does your car weigh with driver?

[racergirl]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

Ah thought so track error all the way around. 1.8 60' yet ran the same time.

Sorry but just look at all the other auto cars. Even ones with full bolt ons barely run low 14s. There is just no way a stock 2LS can crack 13s lol lets be real here. Absolutely track error OR you have a factory freak and need to get the car dynoed. The slips are the evidence.

The last time I checked the bolt-on list, the automatics were running 13.40s-13.70s. What list were you looking at?

[62nalide]

Originally Posted by EnlighteningYou

Not tryng to be rude, but what possible skills come into play when driving and AUTOMATIC trans car? lol. there is one pedal and hold on.

I never say or start drama but this comment has go to be one the most retarded one of 2013 I've seen

[62nalide]

Originally Posted by racergirl

First off the 2LS has 2.92 gears not 2.73 gears. Anyone who knows cars, or Camaros for that matter, would know that. State Capitol Raceway in Baton Rouge is a real dragstrip where they really prep the track. On the timeslip in question that shows the 1.84 60', look at the 60' on car #13; his front half of the timeslip was messed up too, no way that the 5.0 Mustang went 1.36 60'. The front half of the slip was messed up for both cars. Just look at the other timeslips; they all add up. $500 for anyone that can prove my car isn't bone stock, come down to State Capitol or No Problem.

P.S. How much does your car weigh with driver?

Let them think what they want, congrats on your times, some people think its just about slamming the pedal to the floor lol

DA plays a good role here just like any car will run great with good DA, your car ran it and you posted prof I remember Trw427ss ran 11.52 on a L99 with bolt ons and many people off the forum has been saying that there is no way he can be running those times lol

[racergirl]

Originally Posted by 62nalide

I never say or start drama but this comment has go to be one the most retarded one of 2013 I've seen

Thank you!!! Another person that gets it!

[Merc]

I had a look at the DA for that run time it was -921', so it's possible.

[rtcat600man]

Originally Posted by Merc

I had a look at the DA for that run time it was -921', so it's possible.

With that kind of DA that is HUGE for our little V6. We need every little HP we can get.

[Merc]

Originally Posted by rtcat600man

With that kind of DA that is HUGE for our little V6. We need every little HP we can get.

Equally as good for the Big Brother V8 as well.

[DarkneSS]

Originally Posted by racergirl

First off the 2LS has 2.92 gears not 2.73 gears. Anyone who knows cars, or Camaros for that matter, would know that. State Capitol Raceway in Baton Rouge is a real dragstrip where they really prep the track. On the timeslip in question that shows the 1.84 60', look at the 60' on car #13; his front half of the timeslip was messed up too, no way that the 5.0 Mustang went 1.36 60'. The front half of the slip was messed up for both cars. Just look at the other timeslips; they all add up. $500 for anyone that can prove my car isn't bone stock, come down to State Capitol or No Problem.

P.S. How much does your car weigh with driver?

Originally Posted by racergirl

The last time I checked the bolt-on list, the automatics were running 13.40s-13.70s. What list were you looking at?

99% of Camaro owners in general have no idea what the rear gear ratio is on a 2LS what are you talking about? I'm sure it is a real drag strip and all but the fact is most stock auto V6s run mid to high 14s and most bolt on auto cars run low 14s. Combined with that you have a 2LS with the "fuel economy" gears and you have the heaviest stock rim they ever offered which are even HEAVIER than the RS/SS 20s wrapped with the least sticky drag tire you could possibly find. On top of that your time slip has errors. How are you going to try and call it legitimate when half of it is messed up? That is like failing a test with a 50% and trying to argue you deserve a 100% because you did half the test perfectly.
And I know the times very well. Those cars are on the FAST list first of all and most of them are full bolt on, full bolt on + drag radial cars. And look at what they trapped, an average of about 100.7. Look at what the stock cars trap, about 96 on average.
I spent 3 years in the V6 "game" and raced my car a ton of times along with a bunch of people on this forum and there is just no way an auto V6 is running 13s stock. I think you're the victim of a messed up track or like I said you have some kind of factory freak and need a dyno.

[rtcat600man]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

99% of Camaro owners in general have no idea what the rear gear ratio is on a 2LS what are you talking about? I'm sure it is a real drag strip and all but the fact is most stock auto V6s run mid to high 14s and most bolt on auto cars run low 14s. Combined with that you have a 2LS with the "fuel economy" gears and you have the heaviest stock rim they ever offered which are even HEAVIER than the RS/SS 20s wrapped with the least sticky drag tire you could possibly find. On top of that your time slip has errors. How are you going to try and call it legitimate when half of it is messed up? That is like failing a test with a 50% and trying to argue you deserve a 100% because you did half the test perfectly.
And I know the times very well. Those cars are on the FAST list first of all and most of them are full bolt on, full bolt on + drag radial cars. And look at what they trapped, an average of about 100.7. Look at what the stock cars trap, about 96 on average.
I spent 3 years in the V6 "game" and raced my car a ton of times along with a bunch of people on this forum and there is just no way an auto V6 is running 13s stock. I think you're the victim of a messed up track or like I said you have some kind of factory freak and need a dyno.

Nobody believed me 3 years ago when I ran a 13.7 @ 103 either when using just my INJEN and MRT 2.0 on stock 19's. But I have the time slips too.

Was I ever able to repeat that........nope. Not until recently when I added more bolt ons, and added my smaller dia drag radials.

Was it a freak of a day at the track 3 years ago. Were the stars aligned. Who knows. All I can say is if she said she made that pass stock and has the slip to prove it GREAT, who should any of us be to argue that point. What's the difference, it is not like we are being paid to be at the top of the list.

The LFX makes good HP. With that DA she was making good power. With that gear ratio she probably rolled out perfect and had no spinning.

Let it go. Especially since you have now moved on to a V8 and have no coin in this race anyway.

[DarkneSS]

Trust me when I say I really don't care. I just think its funny to call people out on BS and see them try to defend it.

[racergirl]

Originally Posted by DarkneSS

Trust me when I say I really don't care. I just think its funny to call people out on BS and see them try to defend it.

You're the only one who thinks it's BS, and if you claim that you don't care, why did you even bother opening your mouth in the first place? Quit harping on that one timeslip. Seriously. We ALL know that the front halves were messed up but the et's and mph's were correct. I have 10 other timeslips to prove how fast I went from that day. My two 13 seconds runs were nearly four weeks on Nov 24 and they were completely correct. You never answered how much your car weighed with driver. As rtcat600man put it just let it go, you've moved on.