06-06-2013, 12:57 PM | #15 | |
Drives: 10 Procharged SS Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The creek at the end of the dead end road
Posts: 1,857
|
Quote:
I would say the DA is getting a lot of your power. (did you drive the car there, was the engine kept hot... all this comes into play as your computer will pull timing as it heats up and power loss with climb). Put a nice converter in the car and watch it come alive |
|
06-14-2013, 10:25 PM | #16 |
Custom User Title
Drives: 2012 Camaro 45th Anniversary Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 26
|
I ran tonight again at the track
60- 1.982 ET 8.071 MPH 92.14 slick were at 18 pounds I think I will drop the air down to 14 pounds next week. Any idea what I can do on the cheap side under $3000 to get in the MPH @ 97 ?? Will Skinny's help on the front ? ( running stock rims and tire on Front and weld rims and Hoosiers on rear) Rear gears are 3.70 posi Headers,axle shafts and supercharger from SLP is all I have done to the car. Jannetty did the rear and gears. It would be nice to get my 60 lower. |
06-15-2013, 11:30 AM | #17 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
I think before you start throwing money at the car, you should step back and think on this. If you look at the slip I posted above, your car is low mph in the 1/8 and the ET should be lower I think. IMO....
1) Make sure you are not running with TCS on 2) Make sure your car is shifting at the right rpms for your combo, maybe some quicker blowered guys can suggest what they use. 3) Your short times should be at least 1.8's. Make sure you are getting real heat into those tires, and make sure you are lining up in the groove. Are you spinning or does it dead hook? You need to know. 4) Fix whatever is not right. Go back. Repeat.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
06-16-2013, 08:56 AM | #18 | |
Drives: none Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: DFW area
Posts: 1,844
|
Quote:
You have an issue that you need to sort out. Sometimes it's not always as easy as "buy parts, run fast". |
|
06-24-2013, 08:32 AM | #19 |
Drives: Nothing Fun. Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: CT
Posts: 1,052
|
I agree with everything that's the been said so far. Careful mixing those tires as someone has pointed out, can be pretty dangerous.
I think there's more on the table with some tuning and a CAI kit. Approx. 30-40 RWHP. |
06-24-2013, 09:15 AM | #20 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
1.98 on slicks? Track suck? That 60 is very weak for a slick. I just went 1.66 on 18" Nittos.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
06-24-2013, 09:22 AM | #21 |
Drives: 2010 rs/ss black # 10,308 Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: hoffman estates, il
Posts: 914
|
I agree with PSJ and everyone else on this one.
I know how fustrating it can be to try and get the time that you want. But the real trick is mastering the setup that you have before taking the next step or buying new stuff. I thank PSJ for really highlighting that for me. Yes you could probably invest more money into the car and make it faster then what it is now, but you would still be leaving the possibility for improvement on the table. Focus on practicing and getting that 60ft down. I too ran a 1.72 on 18" drag radials -with stock gear, stock suspension,and stock rear end... so you with slicks should be able to get numbers even lower then that. So i see that as the biggest area of opportunity right now. Don't look at any other number on that time slip until you get the 60ft down. It took me several trips and passes at the track to lower my 60ft. I started at 1.9x's and now have the right feel for the launch to where i am confident now. Thats all it takes is more seat time really. just my .02's
__________________
|
06-25-2013, 01:18 PM | #22 |
Drives: 2012 ZL1 Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: pittsburgh area
Posts: 1,426
|
As said above, find out what is going on at the launch. With slicks the 60' should be much better. I'm cutting 1.6's on 18" hoosier drs with only 3.23 gears so there's more left in your combo as it sits. If your not spinning is it bogging? Computer pulling timing (car falls on its face)? Find out what's wrong now before putting more money in it or it will only frustrate you worse
__________________
2012 CTF ZL1-stock
2012 ZL1 (sold) JRE 75rwhp kit catless ported lsa TB 11.04 @ 128.35 on hoosier drs and skinnies @ PRP with 1100DA |
06-25-2013, 01:52 PM | #23 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2010 Camaro Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
|
14# in a slick on a 4k# car is a bad idea. Especially with radials out front. 17-18 is fine. No need to go lower than that. If it doesn't hook then adjust your burnout.
|
07-10-2013, 01:20 PM | #24 |
Drives: 2013 Chevy Camaro 2LT 3.6 V6 Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: United States
Posts: 715
|
Nice reaction time????
__________________
Seriously Sinning - "Veronica" Commandment 11 - Thou shall not travel slowly. |
|
|
|
|