Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-20-2008, 08:48 AM   #15
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crazy Coast
Posts: 15,201
I would be willing to be most of the weight is to account for stronger parts in powertrain and chassis. I'm sure the tranny is built stronger, and that 6.1 block is probably a bit heavier, among other things. The bigger the spread in weight, the bette
__________________

'20 ZL1 Black "Fury"
A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor
Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 08:52 AM   #16
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
the 6.1 block is heavier than the 5.7small block. either way it won't matter when I stroke my 6.1 to a 426.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 10:36 AM   #17
GOT PSI
 
GOT PSI's Avatar
 
Drives: SRT-4
Join Date: May 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 122
I don't think there will be any competition for the r/t coming from the v6 camaro.
__________________
I am a power junkie,
and forced induction is my fix.
GOT PSI is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 10:45 AM   #18
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOT PSI View Post
I don't think there will be any competition for the r/t coming from the v6 camaro.
On the other hand I will admit the v6 challenger will not compete with anything until it changes to the phoenix engine in 2010.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 11:29 AM   #19
Xanthos
PWA Relapse
 
Xanthos's Avatar
 
Drives: Formerly-Stick
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 12,588
Quote:
Originally Posted by GOT PSI View Post
I don't think there will be any competition for the r/t coming from the v6 camaro.
Why not? The challenger is 400 pounds heaver than the V6 camaro. Car and Driver got the CTS to 60 in 5.8 seconds -
Quote:
Our 304-hp manual ran 0 to 60 mph in 5.8 seconds and blew through the quarter-mile in 14.6 at 97 mph...
- and it weighs 200 pounds more than the camaro and has thinner tires (comparing FE3 caddy to RS camaro - 235 rear on the caddy, 275 on the camaro). So yes, the Camaro will be faster than the CTS (I'm expecting about 5.6 - 5.7 and 14.4-14.5 in the 1/4) and a little slower than the R/T - but it will get better fuel economy, have better styling, and cost easily 7,000 dollars less (the Chally R/T MSRPs at 29,995, base - 30,990 with the manual). So, yes, I think the R/T has much to worry about coming from the V6 camaro.
- Xanthos
__________________

2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic

Xanthos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 12:17 PM   #20
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by XanthosV6 View Post
Why not? The challenger is 400 pounds heaver than the V6 camaro. Car and Driver got the CTS to 60 in 5.8 seconds -

- and it weighs 200 pounds more than the camaro and has thinner tires (comparing FE3 caddy to RS camaro - 235 rear on the caddy, 275 on the camaro). So yes, the Camaro will be faster than the CTS (I'm expecting about 5.6 - 5.7 and 14.4-14.5 in the 1/4) and a little slower than the R/T - but it will get better fuel economy, have better styling, and cost easily 7,000 dollars less (the Chally R/T MSRPs at 29,995, base - 30,990 with the manual). So, yes, I think the R/T has much to worry about coming from the V6 camaro.
- Xanthos
not in the styling department imo and neither in performance with almost 400 lbs of torque and 75 more horsepower it will be more than fine.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 12:21 PM   #21
Wm Holden
Yes, that's my real name.
 
Wm Holden's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 LS2 600hp GTO
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Ventura, ca.
Posts: 770
real numbers

challenger vs gto mid 13s slow otl...


Video----V
__________________
Magnuson 112HH supercharger at 7.5 psi (Virtual 9.0 liter) 600hp 1 of 2 torrid/red int /A4/05 555r 275/40/R17's Nitto Extreme Drags 1.7 60 ft Car runs high 11's No other mods. I got the first 112HH Magnuson blower ported for a GTO. Now it appears it was also one of the last....



http://www.ribbonprinting.com http://www.personalizedawarenessribbons.com
Wm Holden is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 12:28 PM   #22
Xanthos
PWA Relapse
 
Xanthos's Avatar
 
Drives: Formerly-Stick
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 12,588
Yeah, but thats an SRT8 isn't it, not an R/T? The SRT8 will be significantly faster than the V6 camaro, of course - but I could get two camaros for the price.
- Xanthos
__________________

2017 1LT/RS A8 Hyper Blue Metallic

Xanthos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 12:41 PM   #23
Congoman775

 
Congoman775's Avatar
 
Drives: Muscle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by XanthosV6 View Post
Why not? The challenger is 400 pounds heaver than the V6 camaro. Car and Driver got the CTS to 60 in 5.8 seconds -

- and it weighs 200 pounds more than the camaro and has thinner tires (comparing FE3 caddy to RS camaro - 235 rear on the caddy, 275 on the camaro). So yes, the Camaro will be faster than the CTS (I'm expecting about 5.6 - 5.7 and 14.4-14.5 in the 1/4) and a little slower than the R/T - but it will get better fuel economy, have better styling, and cost easily 7,000 dollars less (the Chally R/T MSRPs at 29,995, base - 30,990 with the manual). So, yes, I think the R/T has much to worry about coming from the V6 camaro.
- Xanthos




The V6 Camaro will run with the R.T. Chally just fine.

It LOOKS better. imo.

Gets MUCH better gas millage.

is significantly CHEAPER where some people who cant afford an R/T will buy RS V6.

And it's WEIGHT gives it a huge advantage. over 4000lbs? we know that the SRT feels lighter than that with the huge wheels and brembos, but that doesnt say anything about the R/T.
Congoman775 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 12:45 PM   #24
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by XanthosV6 View Post
Yeah, but thats an SRT8 isn't it, not an R/T? The SRT8 will be significantly faster than the V6 camaro, of course - but I could get two camaros for the price.
- Xanthos
No actually it is not. The new 5.7 gets 375 hp and 398lb tq. Lol this comparison to the v6 is rediculous. Just like the v6 vs mustang gtv8 was rediculous.
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 12:56 PM   #25
Congoman775

 
Congoman775's Avatar
 
Drives: Muscle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
No actually it is not. The new 5.7 gets 375 hp and 398lb tq. Lol this comparison to the v6 is rediculous. Just like the v6 vs mustang gtv8 was rediculous.
the V6 camaro will hang with the R/T more easily than the GT.
Congoman775 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 12:58 PM   #26
kevin2323


 
Drives: challenger
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: miami
Posts: 2,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by Congoman775 View Post
the V6 camaro will hang with the R/T more easily than the GT.
I will agree with you on that
kevin2323 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 01:08 PM   #27
Congoman775

 
Congoman775's Avatar
 
Drives: Muscle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Florida
Posts: 1,315
Quote:
Originally Posted by kevin2323 View Post
I will agree with you on that
Congoman775 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-20-2008, 01:24 PM   #28
GOT PSI
 
GOT PSI's Avatar
 
Drives: SRT-4
Join Date: May 2008
Location: El Paso
Posts: 122
Quote:
Originally Posted by XanthosV6 View Post
Why not? The challenger is 400 pounds heaver than the V6 camaro. Car and Driver got the CTS to 60 in 5.8 seconds -

- and it weighs 200 pounds more than the camaro and has thinner tires (comparing FE3 caddy to RS camaro - 235 rear on the caddy, 275 on the camaro). So yes, the Camaro will be faster than the CTS (I'm expecting about 5.6 - 5.7 and 14.4-14.5 in the 1/4) and a little slower than the R/T - but it will get better fuel economy, have better styling, and cost easily 7,000 dollars less (the Chally R/T MSRPs at 29,995, base - 30,990 with the manual). So, yes, I think the R/T has much to worry about coming from the V6 camaro.
- Xanthos
We are comparing performance not looks or price. I race0and I do it often and in my experience an auto r/t > mustang gt wich I see > a v6 camaro and the 6 speed r/t > auto r/t. The DI v6 is a great engine but come on guys. Not as someone stated prior I agree the v6 maro will OWN the V6 chally till the phoenix comes out.
__________________
I am a power junkie,
and forced induction is my fix.
GOT PSI is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 07:05 PM
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept Tran 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 12 03-15-2009 04:38 PM
The Camaro team at GM seeks answers ChrisL 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 148 08-28-2008 08:47 PM
Cheryl Pilcher (Fbodmother) Questions & Answers camaro5 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 2 04-19-2008 05:07 PM
Q&A with John Fitzpatrick - Camaro Marketing Manager camaro5 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 4 04-15-2008 02:28 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:28 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.