Why can't GM offer closer to Mustang

[911medic]

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson

Safe to say that this discussion has gone completely astray of OP's topic starter.

Agreed.

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson

This may be what fielder is getting at.


Norm

Hmmm. Interesting perspective, but if so, I think it's only caused further deviation from the OP's topic.

[Frank in MD]

Originally Posted by cbass

The incentives on a 2013 mustang are very steep right now:

0% APR for 60 mos.
Ford Credit Financing

PLUS up to
$4,000
Bonus Cash


OR up to
$6,000
Cash Back

http://www.ford.com/cars/mustang/2013/incentives/

Looks like the deals out west are far better than in the Mid-Atlantic.

0% APR for 60 mos.
Ford Credit Financing

PLUS
$2,000
Bonus Cash

OR up to
$3,500
Cash Back

http://www.ford.com/cars/mustang/2013/incentives/

BTW, seems a big chunk of these rebates aren't something everyone can get.
as all of these offers include $1,000 competitive lease rebates. Which means if there is a non-Ford product registered @ your residence that is a lease you get the rebate, if not you get ****-all.
$1,000 Competitive Lease Conquest 10

[fielderLS3]

Originally Posted by Norm Peterson

Safe to say that this discussion has gone completely astray of OP's topic starter.

For reference . . .

Originally Posted by 911medic

Agreed.


Hmmm. Interesting perspective, but if so, I think it's only caused further deviation from the OP's topic.

I'll be honest, when I jumped into this, I pretty much skipped past the first page or two of posts, and just read the last 5 or 10 post or so. It was kinda derailed already when I first got here, so I didn't even know who the OP or the original subject was until Norm just posted it.

[AzItaliaSS]

Originally Posted by BigRedMikeLV

Or you know what would make more sense? People holding out for 14's. If it was a tail light issue the numbers would have surged to get the old style before it was gone.

Well maybe the fact they messed up the newest model or "refresh" as they call it, would make some of those in the muscle market stray another direction after seeing what direction chevy has gone, not to mention having to be forced into a position to buy the "older model" because the newer one is not as great design wise doesnt make sense and would steer some away to another brand option that has a "current" offering that doesnt have a step backwards design flaw.

Obviously if a rival design gets better and ours gets worse then why wouldnt it be an option and also a realistic reason why sales level? Several muscle car individuals start out with options open and choose one of the three when they are done testing at the dealer.

So no, I dont buy the numbers should have surged to get the "old style" argument if tails were to blame.

[ChrisBlair]

I would have liked a choice of rear gears

[45THanniversarySS]

Originally Posted by AdamZ

LS3 is faster of course.


Ahahahaha BRING IT L99ers!



I kid I kid

wait who was it that didnt wanna go any faster than 130 on 275? i think it was AdamZ who didnt wanna chase me lol

[bigssc]

this thread sucks , its turned into a pissing contest of "ford gives a better deal, NO chevy gives a better deal" they both F**K u at the end of the day lol its all in the eyes of the beholder fellas. i prefer chevy's but that doesnt mean anything because i paid well over 40k for my 2013 2ss and i dont care i got the car i wanted with the features i wanted.