Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Technical Camaro Topics > Dragstrip and Launch Techniques Discussion


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-24-2013, 11:50 AM   #29
2SS45th


 
2SS45th's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 Seconds or Faster
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Arvada, Colorado
Posts: 2,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supercharged SS View Post
Lots of talk, no racing. I guess your Sam the talker. Plenty of cars faster than mine. I'm ok with it. You, on the other hand seem obsessed with me. Kinda creepy.


I'd like to see someone run a 9.60 in these cars sub 700 wheel, it'd give me hope!
__________________
I Ain't About That Stock Life.

2SS45th is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 11:58 AM   #30
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Wow is it that hard to believe? Didn't Rhino79 run a 10.87 with 475rwhp? And is shooting for a 9.90 or better with a 150shot? It is VERY possible high 500s or low 600s.
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 12:15 PM   #31
Supercharged SS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Sandy Hook, CT
Posts: 11,927
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62nalide View Post
Wow is it that hard to believe? Didn't Rhino79 run a 10.87 with 475rwhp? And is shooting for a 9.90 or better with a 150shot? It is VERY possible high 500s or low 600s.
Getting struck by lighting is also possible, but the probability is very slim.

I believe Rhinos car was over 500. But that time is still crazy fast for such a low rwhp, fat car.
Supercharged SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 12:35 PM   #32
62nalide


 
62nalide's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 SS
Join Date: May 2013
Location: DFW
Posts: 4,102
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supercharged SS View Post
Getting struck by lighting is also possible, but the probability is very slim.

I believe Rhinos car was over 500. But that time is still crazy fast for such a low rwhp, fat car.
I'm pretty sure it was around 470 480ish because just a month ago he barely put down 506rwhp or so and has not hit the track yet.
62nalide is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 12:45 PM   #33
Juice2SS

 
Drives: 2011 2SS
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: DFW, TX
Posts: 931
Yup... it was with his MAST cam and no head work. It was a 470-480rwhp number.
Juice2SS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 02:03 PM   #34
429
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 camaro ss
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Richmond Hill, GA
Posts: 726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Supercharged SS View Post

Add the 580 lbs, check your math, then repost.

My car will go 135+ at 3650 raceweight and it only dynos 560ish unlocked. It's really not that farfetched.
429 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 05:50 PM   #35
Steve@SNL/Monster Clutch
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2014 SS
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Haslet, TX
Posts: 744
It's funny how people like to bench race peak dyno numbers which should only be used for tuning as they can be skewed in so many ways especially with an auto ie converter locked/unlocked, gear selection the A6 isn't 1:1 in 4th, weight of wheels/tires and rearends eat up different amounts of power, besides the fact the track is uncorrected hp output and the dyno doesn't take into account any ram air effects at speed. Good luck Sam, I remember seeing the car run at Crandall!
Steve@SNL/Monster Clutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 06:05 PM   #36
dekan513
chevy pride
 
dekan513's Avatar
 
Drives: 2ss/rs
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: pikeville ky
Posts: 2,141
steve , ive said that before and ppl act as im dumb. thats why ppl are liking the vvt stuff. the mid range power is great from what ive seen of it. but a car that making a good power curve vs a peak hp car the power curve is gonna take it. peak is usally only seen for a split second. midrange to hi mid is the meat on the bone.
__________________

check out ky speeds fb page https://www.facebook.com/kyspeed
dekan513 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 06:32 PM   #37
Steve@SNL/Monster Clutch
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2014 SS
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Haslet, TX
Posts: 744
Quote:
Originally Posted by dekan513 View Post
steve , ive said that before and ppl act as im dumb. thats why ppl are liking the vvt stuff. the mid range power is great from what ive seen of it. but a car that making a good power curve vs a peak hp car the power curve is gonna take it. peak is usally only seen for a split second. midrange to hi mid is the meat on the bone.
Exactly, average power is what wins races!
Steve@SNL/Monster Clutch is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 08:23 PM   #38
grocerygetter
instigator
 
grocerygetter's Avatar
 
Drives: 2020 6.2 Trail Boss, 2022 XC90
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: 72034
Posts: 3,979
....Sam...awesome car...dumb side tracked question...I take you did the vfn sunoco hood...any fit issues?
__________________
-John S.
grocerygetter is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 10:13 PM   #39
Sam88gta1
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS / 2006 CC Duramax
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rowlett
Posts: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by grocerygetter View Post
....Sam...awesome car...dumb side tracked question...I take you did the vfn sunoco hood...any fit issues?
Bolted it straight on the car without any issue. It was 23.75 lbs for the fiberglass version. Just an FYI.
Sam88gta1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 10:15 PM   #40
Sam88gta1
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS / 2006 CC Duramax
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Rowlett
Posts: 377
Quote:
Originally Posted by 62nalide View Post
Similar setup as Brain's S-10? What would be the weight difference between them? Cause that S dime is freaking fast!
Close to the same yes. Weight is +600 ish.
Sam88gta1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-24-2013, 11:32 PM   #41
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sam88gta1 View Post
Yes it is. I originally built and drove the car for him. I purchased it a few years ago.
I was wondering this too.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-25-2013, 10:01 AM   #42
Steve@SNL/Monster Clutch
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2014 SS
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Haslet, TX
Posts: 744
I remember running with you at Ennis when it still had the 6-speed in it and went 11.3, is it still going to have a th400 this time around? Chris
Steve@SNL/Monster Clutch is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:24 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.