Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
TireRack
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-13-2009, 09:49 AM   #15
SWAT 79
 
SWAT 79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
HAHA WOW, my bad. I thought it was your camaro that was being compared for some reason, my bad.

I mean its the opposite, the camaro is the slow car, the vette is the fast one...


Which is relative because they're both fast, but comparatively, you know what i mean.
SWAT 79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 10:29 AM   #16
S8ER01Z
 
Drives: Camaro Z28
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by SWAT 79 View Post
HAHA WOW, my bad. I thought it was your camaro that was being compared for some reason, my bad.

I mean its the opposite, the camaro is the slow car, the vette is the fast one...


Which is relative because they're both fast, but comparatively, you know what i mean.
I got you..I didn't mean for my post to be so hostile (I posted from my Iphone last night)... I just wondered how I got involved in the comparison. haha. I apologize for the tone of my post.
__________________
2001 Camaro Z28 M6 (MTI Lid/FRA, LS6 Cam, BBK LTs, 3.90s)
2021 Durango Hellcat
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 03:28 PM   #17
SWAT 79
 
SWAT 79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
Nah its cool...that was definitely a wtf moment anyway haha
SWAT 79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 04:32 PM   #18
REEFBLUE93
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1993 Rustang
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 941
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsharp View Post
Well thats cool. Its nice to know its not to be expected I did however beat a stock C5 with him having exhaust cai and dr's by like a car and 1/2.
That's not a stock Vette. I'm looking at the "LS1 RX7" and guessing you drive an RX7 equipped with an LS1 motor?
REEFBLUE93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-13-2009, 07:14 PM   #19
9c1ny
 
9c1ny's Avatar
 
Drives: C6 Zed-oh-six
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 677
stock A6 SS vs stock C5 should be very close, stock M6 SS should take a stock C5 by a car or two
__________________
9c1ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 08:01 AM   #20
REEFBLUE93
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1993 Rustang
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Texas
Posts: 941
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9c1ny View Post
stock A6 SS vs stock C5 should be very close, stock M6 SS should take a stock C5 by a car or two
I'm guessing the "A" and the "M" are in reference to the transmissions. Is there a huge difference between a Camaro with a manual and a Vette with a manual? I'm just trying to possibly gain a little knowledge here, not being sarcastic in any way.
REEFBLUE93 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 08:45 AM   #21
S8ER01Z
 
Drives: Camaro Z28
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9c1ny View Post
stock A6 SS vs stock C5 should be very close, stock M6 SS should take a stock C5 by a car or two
Ok I know I shouldn't expect any better but seriously? A c5 losing by 'a car or two'??

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ure/index.html

12.76 at 111.96 - Done at Raceway Park
Quote:
Baur made several more high 12-second runs, but the 12.7 wasn't to be topped.
You guys are seriously underrating an LS1 powered vehicles abilities and it's almost embarassing.
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 11:17 AM   #22
SWAT 79
 
SWAT 79's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Cadillac CTS
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: North Jersey
Posts: 448
Guys, the camaro has no chance. 1. its an auto, so it loses more of its hp through the drivetrain to the wheels, 2, the vette is a vette, it would smoke the camaro without the nitrous, and with. Well, you should try it and see how many cars you "win" by.
SWAT 79 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 01:20 PM   #23
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 25,372
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Quote:
Originally Posted by S8ER01Z View Post
Is this simply a case of 'I have 400hp and the vette only has 350hp' or do people really think C5s are that slow in general?
I don't know, but an LS1 'Vette with 125 shot of nitrous isn't making 350 hp anymore.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 01:46 PM   #24
S8ER01Z
 
Drives: Camaro Z28
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
I don't know, but an LS1 'Vette with 125 shot of nitrous isn't making 350 hp anymore.
haha...valid point. Well played sir.
__________________
2001 Camaro Z28 M6 (MTI Lid/FRA, LS6 Cam, BBK LTs, 3.90s)
2021 Durango Hellcat
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-14-2009, 06:05 PM   #25
9c1ny
 
9c1ny's Avatar
 
Drives: C6 Zed-oh-six
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by S8ER01Z View Post
Ok I know I shouldn't expect any better but seriously? A c5 losing by 'a car or two'??

http://www.gmhightechperformance.com...ure/index.html

12.76 at 111.96 - Done at Raceway Park


You guys are seriously underrating an LS1 powered vehicles abilities and it's almost embarassing.



thats a 2003 C5 , 2004 was the last year and much like the LS1 fbods the later year C5s are faster than the earlier ones
its also a M6 car and I would doubt you will find a faster time for a stock C5 anywhere


Much like LS1 fbods there are extremes in times, for every 12.7 second C5 you see you will find a hundred ones that ran in the low to mid 13s

Do you honestly believe a 97/98/ A4 C5 wouldnt lose by several cars to a 2010 M6 SS??

Look at the 0-60 time on the run you dug up "Baur made several more high 12-second runs, but the 12.7 wasn't to be topped. The Stalker radar gun told us that the Vette turned in 0-30 times of 2.2 seconds and a 0-60 sprint in only 4.7."


hmmmmm seems like what any 2010 SS should be capable of and like I said thats a 2003 M6 car, what would a earlier model year car click off??


and your right, its embarassing how much I underrate Ls1 cars, I have only owned 8 different ones, how many have you owned??
__________________
9c1ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 08:10 AM   #26
S8ER01Z
 
Drives: Camaro Z28
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9c1ny View Post
thats a 2003 C5 , 2004 was the last year and much like the LS1 fbods the later year C5s are faster than the earlier ones
its also a M6 car and I would doubt you will find a faster time for a stock C5 anywhere


Much like LS1 fbods there are extremes in times, for every 12.7 second C5 you see you will find a hundred ones that ran in the low to mid 13s

Do you honestly believe a 97/98/ A4 C5 wouldnt lose by several cars to a 2010 M6 SS??

Look at the 0-60 time on the run you dug up "Baur made several more high 12-second runs, but the 12.7 wasn't to be topped. The Stalker radar gun told us that the Vette turned in 0-30 times of 2.2 seconds and a 0-60 sprint in only 4.7."


hmmmmm seems like what any 2010 SS should be capable of and like I said thats a 2003 M6 car, what would a earlier model year car click off??


and your right, its embarassing how much I underrate Ls1 cars, I have only owned 8 different ones, how many have you owned??
Owning an LS1 doesn't mean you know anything... I know people who still think they make 305 at the crank and they have owned several. My point is the only reason you are making the claim you are is that we have a couple 2010s in the 12s. More than a couple of LS1 powered cars have been in the 12s stock and it's a drivers race. Especially the C5 which tends to trap 1 ~ 2mph higher than the f-bodys stock. Claiming a stock LS3 powered SS would be 2 car lengths ahead is naive IMHO and you have a list on this site that backs that up.

Here is a top 5 stock lists from CorvetteForums...
Stock(Street Tire)
12.79x @ 109.80 - boostyfox
12.841 @110.68 - cptinjak
12.84x @ 111.xx - Ramsiec5
12.98x @ 110.xx - lrbinwpb
12.990 @ 107.01 - Mistamike17

Looks like easy pickings for you Camaro SS guys....

Especially the autos...
Stock 2003 A4 13.1 @106mph
Stock '98 coupe, a4 3.15's 13.025 @ 105.54
Stock 2000 A4 13.1 @ 105mph

Of course I don't know why I'm bothering with this..you have owned many and you knew all of this before you posted... which makes me wonder what you know about the new 2010 Camaro SS that I don't because the results I'm seeing don't give me the same end result. When I look at the list this makes me laugh "for every 12.7 second C5 you see you will find a hundred ones that ran in the low to mid 13s".... really? No shit. For every 12 second Camaro SS we have hundreds running 13s and 14s. Thanks for the tip!
__________________
2001 Camaro Z28 M6 (MTI Lid/FRA, LS6 Cam, BBK LTs, 3.90s)
2021 Durango Hellcat
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 03:22 PM   #27
9c1ny
 
9c1ny's Avatar
 
Drives: C6 Zed-oh-six
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Buffalo NY
Posts: 677
Quote:
Originally Posted by S8ER01Z View Post
Owning an LS1 doesn't mean you know anything... I know people who still think they make 305 at the crank and they have owned several.


Here is a top 5 stock lists from CorvetteForums...
Stock(Street Tire)
12.79x @ 109.80 - boostyfox
12.841 @110.68 - cptinjak
12.84x @ 111.xx - Ramsiec5
12.98x @ 110.xx - lrbinwpb
12.990 @ 107.01 - Mistamike17

Looks like easy pickings for you Camaro SS guys....

Especially the autos...
Stock 2003 A4 13.1 @106mph
Stock '98 coupe, a4 3.15's 13.025 @ 105.54
Stock 2000 A4 13.1 @ 105mph

Of course I don't know why I'm bothering with this..you have owned many and you knew all of this before you posted... which makes me wonder what you know about the new 2010 Camaro SS that I don't because the results I'm seeing don't give me the same end result. When I look at the list this makes me laugh "for every 12.7 second C5 you see you will find a hundred ones that ran in the low to mid 13s".... really? No shit. For every 12 second Camaro SS we have hundreds running 13s and 14s. Thanks for the tip!
<let me start out by saying any race is a drivers race, on the street anything can happen and even stock Mustang GTs have beat Dodge Vipers, that being said we are talking about what the cars are capable of with capable drivers>


ummm sorry you know such ignorant ls1 owners, I have been active on ls1tech since 2003 and have been modding and racing 4th gen fbods even longer


C5 Vettes have been on the road for what? 12yrs? maybe closer to 13yrs seeing as though they probably started selling the 97' models in late 96........

2010s have been on the road for what? 6 months?

and in 6 months the 2010 times are already to be 4th on the list of ALL TIME C5 times and the automatic 2010 SS has already run .3ths faster than a automatic C5 has EVER run bone stock

Since .1tenth = 1 car length roughly thats well umm a 3 car length win for the 2010 SS

And of course being out for 6 months and maybe 10% of them actually having been at the track I'm sure we have seen the fastest times we will EVER see for bone stock 5th gens


so when someone heads out to etown in December and rips off a 12.6 bone stock what tune will you be singing then?



thanks for playing
__________________

Last edited by 9c1ny; 10-15-2009 at 03:32 PM.
9c1ny is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-15-2009, 03:34 PM   #28
S8ER01Z
 
Drives: Camaro Z28
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: NC
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by 9c1ny View Post
ummm sorry you know such ignorant ls1 owners, I have been active on ls1tech since 2003 and have been modding and racing 4th gen fbods even longer
Just pointing out obvious fact... you yourself should know it's true since you post on LS1tech.

Quote:
C5 Vettes have been on the road for what? 12yrs? maybe closer to 13yrs seeing as though they probably started selling the 97' models in late 96........

2010s have been on the road for what? 6 months?

and in 6 months the 2010 times are already to be 4th on the list of ALL TIME C5 times and the automatic 2010 SS has already run .3ths faster than a automatic C5 has EVER run bone stock

Since .1tenth = 1 car length roughly thats well umm a 3 car length win for the 2010 SS

And of course being out for 6 months and maybe 10% of them actually having been at the track I'm sure we have seen the fastest times we will EVER see for bone stock 5th gens
The internet is also nothing like what is was back when these cars came out new. A lot of information is online for 2010s that was never available when 1997 C5s came out. Hell even as far back as 2001 there wasn't a large list of 'top stock times' anywhere... if it was on LS1.com I doubt it survived the site purge. Things have changed a lot... I'm merely providing MANY examples of results that poke holes in your blowout victory theory.

Quote:
so when someone heads out to etown in December and rips off a 12.6 bone stock what tune will you be singing then?

thanks for playing
I called that 4 months ago and it's still doubtfull that anything more than a 12.7x will occur. It's entirely possible but irrelevant until it occurs. In other words...come see me when it happens and my opinion at that time will obviously be different.

Would love to see your track times btw... with all this talk I assume you have already smoked every C5 time I listed.
__________________
2001 Camaro Z28 M6 (MTI Lid/FRA, LS6 Cam, BBK LTs, 3.90s)
2021 Durango Hellcat
S8ER01Z is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Think about this and the Z28 5th gen 13F20 Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 41 09-04-2010 12:59 AM
UPDATE: Icon Autosports Inc. 738 RWHP 699 LB/FT 2010 SS Stock Internal LS3!!! taqwache Forced Induction - V8 71 10-02-2009 02:03 AM
New autoblog review on the 2010 Camaro SS linkwpc 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 6 10-01-2009 07:46 PM
Motortrend: 2010 V6 vs 1967 350 SS christianjax Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 18 09-19-2008 05:25 PM
Camaro does the Nurburgring test track in 8:20 2sharp 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 45 07-23-2008 03:17 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:30 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.