700 RWHP 2010 SS VS 08 yamaha r1 - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

Oxtar41 · 08-31-2012, 06:40 PM

Title says it. A buddy of mine and myself were talking as he has a 08 R1 with a slip-on and a basic tune from a power commander. My cars built and blown and makes 700rwhp.
From a roll on the highway at like 60 mph who would win?

I'm thinking it would be pretty close, I have destroyed r6's in the past but who knows. My cars a LS3 with 3.45's in the rear.

JEFF75645 · 08-31-2012, 06:45 PM

My brother in law challenged me against is Harley Fat Bob? With mods. I figure I will wait until after the com to accept. Good luck.

ARod221 · 08-31-2012, 06:52 PM

it could be a close one....but I think the R1 may get you by a hair. I also have an R1 and they are pretty darn fast.....an R6 is slow in comparison to the R1. Just my thoughts. FWIW.
on another note......sounds like you have a very Stout Camaro though!

az2ss · 08-31-2012, 06:55 PM

just a heads up, some people on here get there panties on a bundle if you mention anything about racing on a highway.

2Carats · 08-31-2012, 06:56 PM

Ill take the R1... and that's my final answer.

Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III via Tapatalk

Oxtar41 · 08-31-2012, 06:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by az2ss

just a heads up, some people on here get there panties on a bundle if you mention anything about racing on a highway.

Its just bench racing, we arent really going to do it.

cmiller8006 · 08-31-2012, 07:05 PM

R1, they can trap in the 140 range with a good 170 lb rider. My stock 2011 gsxr 750 traps 135, only mods are strapped front end and 1 down front sprocket. Has about 30 less whp then a stock 08 r1 as well. Good luck

MichaelH · 09-01-2012, 02:17 AM

R1 will win by a pretty big margin. no offense but youll need closer to a 1000rwhp to take out a liter bike there 9 sec cars easily off show room floor

GEEo · 09-01-2012, 02:21 AM

He'd beat you no prob!! 700hp on a car is not enough to hang with those guys!

You'd need to be around a 1000+ WHP to play with bikes like the R1.

8cd03gro · 09-01-2012, 03:00 AM

The R1 should be faster, but rider ability comes into play big time on bikes that fast.

caper · 09-01-2012, 10:22 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by 8cd03gro

The R1 should be faster, but rider ability comes into play big time on bikes that fast.

yep! sure does.

cmiller8006 · 09-01-2012, 04:10 PM

Also People need to not put a blanket statement on it will take 1000 whp to beat a bike. There are 700 whp hondas that trap 150+ do to there weight. But yes as for the camaro it will take prolly 800 to hang and 1000 to beat them. Also with the less hp on a bike weight really effects its acceleration big time. The difference in a 20 lb rider with the same skill can be quite a big difference. My buddie has a 170+ whp zx10 and only can run a 10.1 to my 10.4 on my 125whp bike. He weighs 240 to my 165.

Oxtar41 · 09-01-2012, 05:18 PM

Rider weighs around 190-205

soloknight6 · 09-01-2012, 06:25 PM

r1, you cant catch him.

Sax1031 · 09-02-2012, 10:26 AM

If the guy can ride 700rwhp 4000lb car isn't going to pose a problem.

pouncer72 · 09-02-2012, 12:08 PM

R1 is faster by a crapload

Sax1031 · 09-02-2012, 12:30 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmiller8006

Also People need to not put a blanket statement on it will take 1000 whp to beat a bike. There are 700 whp hondas that trap 150+ do to there weight. But yes as for the camaro it will take prolly 800 to hang and 1000 to beat them. Also with the less hp on a bike weight really effects its acceleration big time. The difference in a 20 lb rider with the same skill can be quite a big difference. My buddie has a 170+ whp zx10 and only can run a 10.1 to my 10.4 on my 125whp bike. He weighs 240 to my 165.

I weighed 220 when I had a 152whp 02 GSXR1000.

My first ever run down the track was a 10.28 @ 128 mph with a 2.6 60ft time.

Your friend can't ride a bike at all.

cmiller8006 · 09-02-2012, 08:10 PM

Yea your talking through your teeth there buddie. His 60 foots are 1.70-1.75 consistant with traps of 138-141. Even my runs my fastest 60 was 1.78, ran 10.46 at 133. I think you should remember harder what you ran.

JEFF75645 · 09-02-2012, 10:44 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by pouncer72

R1 is faster by a crapload

Is a crapload 3 or 4 car lengths. I can't remember.

pouncer72 · 09-02-2012, 11:40 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by JEFF75645

Is a crapload 3 or 4 car lengths. I can't remember.

It's approx a football field, or 1/4 of an aircraft carrier

Sax1031 · 09-03-2012, 10:41 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmiller8006

Yea your talking through your teeth there buddie. His 60 foots are 1.70-1.75 consistant with traps of 138-141. Even my runs my fastest 60 was 1.78, ran 10.46 at 133. I think you should remember harder what you ran.

I will never forget that first run. I had been down the track many many times in my car. I remember laughing so hard at the timeslip because I had a 2.6 second 60ft time and still ran low 10s.

my second run went into the 9s @ 148 mph.

MichaelH · 09-03-2012, 12:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by cmiller8006

Yea your talking through your teeth there buddie. His 60 foots are 1.70-1.75 consistant with traps of 138-141. Even my runs my fastest 60 was 1.78, ran 10.46 at 133. I think you should remember harder what you ran.

If he was on a liter bike esp. zx10 since it is the fastest of the liter bikes besides te 1000rr BMW and he shld have easily gotten at least low 9s out of that

cmiller8006 · 09-03-2012, 12:59 PM

He weighs 250+ lbs. Rickey gadson went 9.70's He weighs 170

Sax1031 · 09-03-2012, 02:08 PM

I should clarify my back wasn't stock. And being lowered that helped a lot in the 60ft. Once I got enough seat time on the bike I was able to run consistent 1.5 60ft times.

10.1 is SLOW on a liter bike though.

edit: bike not back. good lord.

cmiller8006 · 09-03-2012, 04:16 PM

I know it's slow, but around here the da is seldom below 2000 foot in the summer. And on top of his weight and stock wheel base it actually a good time. He is usually top three swb at the track.

08-31-2012, 06:40 PM	#1
Oxtar41 Drives: 700 rwhp 2010 SS Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Garage.. Posts: 737	700 RWHP 2010 SS VS 08 yamaha r1 Title says it. A buddy of mine and myself were talking as he has a 08 R1 with a slip-on and a basic tune from a power commander. My cars built and blown and makes 700rwhp. From a roll on the highway at like 60 mph who would win? I'm thinking it would be pretty close, I have destroyed r6's in the past but who knows. My cars a LS3 with 3.45's in the rear. __________________

08-31-2012, 06:45 PM	#2
JEFF75645 Drives: his wife crazy buying mods Join Date: May 2012 Location: Gilmer, TX Posts: 775 View My Garage	My brother in law challenged me against is Harley Fat Bob? With mods. I figure I will wait until after the com to accept. Good luck. __________________ 2011 Camaro 2 SS/RS L99-461 RWHP / 424 RWTQ for now Lucky's Speed & Performance

08-31-2012, 06:52 PM	#3
ARod221 NINJA! Drives: 2013 (AGM) 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Aug 2012 Location: Gulfport, Ms. Posts: 44 View My Garage	it could be a close one....but I think the R1 may get you by a hair. I also have an R1 and they are pretty darn fast.....an R6 is slow in comparison to the R1. Just my thoughts. FWIW. on another note......sounds like you have a very Stout Camaro though! __________________ 2013 AGM 2SS/RS LS3 Dual mode exhaust Hurst Short throw, CAI intake, Diablo Trinity, 30% tint......JL HD900/5, JL 12W6, and a little help from the FARK V3.0!!!

08-31-2012, 06:56 PM	#5
2Carats Here comes TrOuBLe Drives: '12 Camaro 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jun 2012 Location: here, there, everywhere Posts: 673 View My Garage	Ill take the R1... and that's my final answer. Sent from my Samsung Galaxy S III via Tapatalk __________________ Always shoot for the moon, cuz even if you miss, you'll be among the stars.

08-31-2012, 07:05 PM	#7
cmiller8006 Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Sandusky, Ohio Posts: 368	R1, they can trap in the 140 range with a good 170 lb rider. My stock 2011 gsxr 750 traps 135, only mods are strapped front end and 1 down front sprocket. Has about 30 less whp then a stock 08 r1 as well. Good luck __________________ 2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph Last edited by cmiller8006; 09-01-2012 at 02:01 AM.

08-31-2012, 06:55 PM	#4
az2ss HMFIC Drives: 2012 2SS/RS Join Date: Sep 2011 Location: Gilbert, AZ Posts: 186	just a heads up, some people on here get there panties on a bundle if you mention anything about racing on a highway.

09-01-2012, 02:17 AM	#8
MichaelH SOCAL HT5 Drives: 2010 Camaro RS cybr gry/blck strps Join Date: Apr 2010 Location: NE Ohio Posts: 1,283 View My Garage	R1 will win by a pretty big margin. no offense but youll need closer to a 1000rwhp to take out a liter bike there 9 sec cars easily off show room floor __________________ Upgrades: BBK Longtube Headers W/ High Flow Cats, MRT V 1.0 Exhaust, Airaid CAI V2 tube, VMAX Throttle Body, Trifecta E-85 Tuned, powder coated black rims, window tint,GM Heritage Grill, Rx Oil Catch Can, black out gills, blacked out lights: Other Vehicles: 2008 Kawasaki ZX6R-115 RWHP in mid summer 2006 Chevy Trailblazer SS- (winter tune) getting forged this spring

09-01-2012, 02:21 AM	#9
GEEo OKCamaros Drives: '13 WRX STi Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Muskogee, OK Posts: 4,623	He'd beat you no prob!! 700hp on a car is not enough to hang with those guys! You'd need to be around a 1000+ WHP to play with bikes like the R1.

09-01-2012, 03:00 AM	#10
8cd03gro Drives: 2005 STi corn fed Join Date: Jul 2008 Location: Colorado Posts: 3,010	The R1 should be faster, but rider ability comes into play big time on bikes that fast.

09-01-2012, 04:10 PM	#12
cmiller8006 Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Sandusky, Ohio Posts: 368	Also People need to not put a blanket statement on it will take 1000 whp to beat a bike. There are 700 whp hondas that trap 150+ do to there weight. But yes as for the camaro it will take prolly 800 to hang and 1000 to beat them. Also with the less hp on a bike weight really effects its acceleration big time. The difference in a 20 lb rider with the same skill can be quite a big difference. My buddie has a 170+ whp zx10 and only can run a 10.1 to my 10.4 on my 125whp bike. He weighs 240 to my 165. __________________ 2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph

09-01-2012, 05:18 PM	#13
Oxtar41 Drives: 700 rwhp 2010 SS Join Date: Sep 2010 Location: Garage.. Posts: 737	Rider weighs around 190-205 __________________

09-01-2012, 06:25 PM	#14
soloknight6 SoCal HT5! SD Drives: Roxanne (COTW 11/26/12) Join Date: Nov 2011 Location: Jamul CA Posts: 1,194	r1, you cant catch him. __________________ http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showth...37#post5437037

09-02-2012, 10:26 AM	#15
Sax1031 Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Elgin,SC Posts: 2,709	If the guy can ride 700rwhp 4000lb car isn't going to pose a problem.

09-02-2012, 12:08 PM	#16
pouncer72 Account Suspended Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Richmond Hill, GA Posts: 375	R1 is faster by a crapload

09-02-2012, 08:10 PM	#18
cmiller8006 Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Sandusky, Ohio Posts: 368	Yea your talking through your teeth there buddie. His 60 foots are 1.70-1.75 consistant with traps of 138-141. Even my runs my fastest 60 was 1.78, ran 10.46 at 133. I think you should remember harder what you ran. __________________ 2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph

09-03-2012, 12:59 PM	#23
cmiller8006 Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Sandusky, Ohio Posts: 368	He weighs 250+ lbs. Rickey gadson went 9.70's He weighs 170 __________________ 2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph

09-03-2012, 02:08 PM	#24
Sax1031 Drives: 2000 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009 Location: Elgin,SC Posts: 2,709	I should clarify my back wasn't stock. And being lowered that helped a lot in the 60ft. Once I got enough seat time on the bike I was able to run consistent 1.5 60ft times. 10.1 is SLOW on a liter bike though. edit: bike not back. good lord. Last edited by Sax1031; 09-03-2012 at 07:01 PM.

09-03-2012, 04:16 PM	#25
cmiller8006 Drives: 2009 Cobalt SS/TC Join Date: Sep 2009 Location: Sandusky, Ohio Posts: 368	I know it's slow, but around here the da is seldom below 2000 foot in the summer. And on top of his weight and stock wheel base it actually a good time. He is usually top three swb at the track. __________________ 2009 Cobalt SS/TC: 10.89 at 133mph