02-03-2011, 09:25 PM | #85 | |
|
Quote:
take rwhp/.80 for auto
__________________
my youtube
my facebook www.myspace.com/1djchampagne www.twitter.com/1djchampagne mods: borla long tube headers, borla atak catback, lingenfelter gt-9 cam, ported heads, ecs base kit running 11 psi on top end, 1" bmr drop spring, aam 3.70 gears, ported throttle body, 160* thermorstat, lethal racing tune 750/641 rwhp/rwtq |
|
02-03-2011, 09:30 PM | #86 |
Prefer to be blown!
Drives: 2010 Silver/Black 2SS/RS Manual Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 2,677
|
I like that, it gives me 603 at the crank and all this time I have been saying 575. How accurate is this formula? Thanks!
__________________
MagnaCharger TVS-2300 550rwhp 540 rwt and a radical suspension under the car.
|
02-03-2011, 11:48 PM | #87 |
Drives: 2015 c7 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,462
|
idk man if you have 513 i think 603 to the crank is pushing it
|
02-04-2011, 12:47 AM | #88 |
Prefer to be blown!
Drives: 2010 Silver/Black 2SS/RS Manual Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 2,677
|
That's why I asked about the formula. I'm happy with the 575 number. I actually expected 480 RWHP out of my setup in the first place, I'm going to get another dyne run on a different type to see what I get in.
__________________
MagnaCharger TVS-2300 550rwhp 540 rwt and a radical suspension under the car.
|
02-04-2011, 01:08 AM | #89 |
|
their is generally a 15% power loss thru the drive train. thats how you get the formula of rwhp/.85
__________________
my youtube
my facebook www.myspace.com/1djchampagne www.twitter.com/1djchampagne mods: borla long tube headers, borla atak catback, lingenfelter gt-9 cam, ported heads, ecs base kit running 11 psi on top end, 1" bmr drop spring, aam 3.70 gears, ported throttle body, 160* thermorstat, lethal racing tune 750/641 rwhp/rwtq |
02-04-2011, 01:09 AM | #90 |
Prefer to be blown!
Drives: 2010 Silver/Black 2SS/RS Manual Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Nor-Cal
Posts: 2,677
|
Is it linear?
__________________
MagnaCharger TVS-2300 550rwhp 540 rwt and a radical suspension under the car.
|
02-04-2011, 01:22 AM | #91 |
|
__________________
my youtube
my facebook www.myspace.com/1djchampagne www.twitter.com/1djchampagne mods: borla long tube headers, borla atak catback, lingenfelter gt-9 cam, ported heads, ecs base kit running 11 psi on top end, 1" bmr drop spring, aam 3.70 gears, ported throttle body, 160* thermorstat, lethal racing tune 750/641 rwhp/rwtq |
02-04-2011, 02:09 AM | #92 |
to find drivetrain loss percentage take the 426hp the car was supposed to make and compare that to what your car put down stock... then use that percentage to find what ur new crank hp is versus what you have now at the wheels. I wanna say mine was around 18%.
__________________
85 Buick TType - 5.3l GT4202r 10.86 at 126
|
|
02-04-2011, 02:34 AM | #93 |
Lil progression of dynos... the numbers mean nothing unless you can see your gains!
__________________
85 Buick TType - 5.3l GT4202r 10.86 at 126
Last edited by boostedyards86; 02-04-2011 at 11:24 AM. |
|
02-06-2011, 07:51 AM | #94 |
Drives: 2012 ZL1 - #670 Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Seminole, Fl.
Posts: 8,009
|
This is one of the big debates ... I think the loss should be a static number. In my logic way of thinking, your loss will be determined by the mass and friction of the drive train. If you aren't making any changes to the drive train (anything aft of the crank) then mass and friction should be the same. Using this logic, if you start with a rated crank hp of 426 and have a wheel hp of 362 there would be a loss of 64 hp through the drive train. Lets say you put a few bolt on parts such as headers, exhaust, cai and tune. Now lets say it's running 415 at the rears, logically the loss should be the same and you should be around 479 at the crank. The only way to 100% on your numbers would be doing an engine dyno before doing a chassis ...
__________________
|
02-08-2011, 07:49 PM | #95 |
Romanian Outlaw
Drives: 13 ZL1 , 14 Silverado Crew Cab Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Texas Baby
Posts: 1,082
|
21th century muscle car custom tune
had it done yesterday.. car has a full stainless works exhaust and a lmr cai
__________________
[/SIGPIC]2013 Camaro ZL1 M6
|
02-08-2011, 09:23 PM | #96 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
02-09-2011, 08:21 AM | #97 |
Drives: 11 2SS/RS E-Force Supercharged Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Charlotte
Posts: 814
|
First number is bone stock. Second number is after E-Force with 3.5 pulley, ADM CAI, Kooks complete headers and cat-back and a custom tune.
This is with a custom blower cam from JRE, valve springs and 65lb Injectors and a re-tune. video:
__________________
|
02-10-2011, 09:19 PM | #98 | |
Drives: black Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: rio
Posts: 5
|
- vararam cai
- american racing headrs and X pipe - slp axle back - pulley - ported TB 412 hp 428 torqe Last edited by fkscamaro; 02-10-2011 at 10:52 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
LS3 dyno results | TinyToasta | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 15 | 05-14-2012 08:14 AM |
LS3 and L99 engine dyno test | ULTRAZLS1 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 20 | 09-27-2010 11:52 AM |
Texas Speed Engine Dyno L99 Baseline Vs. LS3 Baseline | Jon@Texas-Speed | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 6 | 07-21-2010 03:55 PM |
What's the highest HP/TQ dyno #'s on the site for a STOCK LS3? | topgun1 | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 38 | 03-24-2010 08:57 PM |
My dyno #'s on a stock LS3 | victoryred1ss | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 4 | 03-18-2010 04:05 PM |