Dyno-Tested: 2011 Dodge Challenger SRT8

[Stew]

Originally Posted by matt55

Doubt it

On a REAL Dynojet graph (not a made up one) the 392 made 420 WHP SAE ( )

I would like to see a vid or a Dynojet print out of this

WHat makes one real and one not?

[assasinator]

if they make 452rwhp broken in like that, they make around.....510-530hp.


neither ford nor chevy has an answer for that. and it in fact will run low 12's stock. just like a gt500. it will make more than a 2007-2009 gt500.


the GT and SS are at the back.

[assasinator]

you guys need to remember when it was said a stock 5.0 couldnt make 390rwhp broken in stock. some have. this is the same thing. some 392's WILL if this isnt a lie. expect it. i do now.

[THE EVIL TW1N]

Originally Posted by assasinator

you guys need to remember when it was said a stock 5.0 couldnt make 390rwhp broken in stock. some have. this is the same thing. some 392's WILL if this isnt a lie. expect it. i do now.

i think theyll dyno 430rwhp on average.

[8cd03gro]

We'll see. Seems a little farfetched from the 111 trap speeds we saw from the one that hit the track, but that is just one car. It's possible.

[Sleestack]

Originally Posted by 8cd03gro

We'll see. Seems a little farfetched from the 111 trap speeds we saw from the one that hit the track, but that is just one car. It's possible.

Other test times are trickling in. 114MPH trap is your other data point.

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 16.3 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 24.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.9 sec @ 114 mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test

[THE EVIL TW1N]

Originally Posted by Sleestack

Other test times are trickling in. 114MPH trap is your other data point.

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 16.3 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 24.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.9 sec @ 114 mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test

That 114mph seems more like it and inline with a 420-430rwhp car with a 4400lbs raceweight

[Legend]

Little high...but none the less an awesome car and engine.

[8cd03gro]

Originally Posted by Sleestack

Other test times are trickling in. 114MPH trap is your other data point.

C/D TEST RESULTS:
Zero to 60 mph: 4.5 sec
Zero to 100 mph: 10.2 sec
Zero to 130 mph: 16.3 sec
Zero to 150 mph: 24.7 sec
Standing ¼-mile: 12.9 sec @ 114 mph
http://www.caranddriver.com/reviews/...take_road_test

Ah, there we go. That seems more realistic when considering the power numbers it's putting down. I'm still skeptical about how that first car pulled off a 12.4 on street tires with only a 111 trap speed. I'd like to find out what the 60' was. . . No doubt this car is pretty bad ass though.

[Sleestack]

Originally Posted by 8cd03gro

Ah, there we go. That seems more realistic when considering the power numbers it's putting down. I'm still skeptical about how that first car pulled off a 12.4 on street tires with only a 111 trap speed. I'd like to find out what the 60' was. . . No doubt this car is pretty bad ass though.

The timeslip for the 12.4 run is below. 1.8 is a very good time for street tires.

[8cd03gro]

A 1.82 with stock IRS and stock tires. . . eh, I don't know about that. Has it been confirmed that it was on stock tires?

[Sleestack]

Originally Posted by 8cd03gro

A 1.82 with stock IRS and stock tires. . . eh, I don't know about that. Has it been confirmed that it was on stock tires?

The claim all is stock. I have seen a few stock 6.1's run 1.8's.... but that was good conditions, drivers, and great track prep (it is possible). Most stock SRT's run 2.05 to 2.15 60's, nursing it off the line.

[Sawyer]

I want to see the times it runs with a supercharger and DR's.

[ViperTomcat]

Originally Posted by 8cd03gro

A 1.82 with stock IRS and stock tires. . . eh, I don't know about that. Has it been confirmed that it was on stock tires?

Yeah, the wheels and tires are stock.