Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 08-23-2012, 03:43 PM   #1
VanquisherSS
Hasbin of Stock Bottom HP
 
Drives: CTS-V Coupe, 04 TT Viper
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,561
Thoughts on Boosting a NA Only Cam

Just as the title says, anyone boost a NA only cam? Looking to push low boost maybe 5-7lbs. Please don't suggest any blower cams just want to know if someone has done this. Thanks all.
VanquisherSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 03:58 PM   #2
Higgs Boson
Perpetual Order
 
Drives: indeed
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
well what cam? a stock cam is not a "blower cam" but it can be used.... it's all about the specs.....

u ru wondering if someone "has done this." all the time......
Higgs Boson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 04:09 PM   #3
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
You can easily do this. If you do some searching you can find articles by Richard Holdener writing mostly for Hot Rod where he's tested an NA combo and then added a blower or a turbo. I personally think it's no big deal for a blower, but for a turbo the LSA might give up some power.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800

Last edited by Pro Stock John; 08-26-2012 at 07:46 PM.
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 06:05 PM   #4
SC2150
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2012 Camaro RS, RX supercharged
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 6,063
We build budget 5.3 motors with take out C5 Z06 cams and turbo 12-18# boost...everything else bone stock except fuel inj, fuel pump, and use a LS6 IM and see 600-800 whp.

SC2150 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 06:58 PM   #5
VanquisherSS
Hasbin of Stock Bottom HP
 
Drives: CTS-V Coupe, 04 TT Viper
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Higgs Boson View Post
well what cam? a stock cam is not a "blower cam" but it can be used.... it's all about the specs.....

u ru wondering if someone "has done this." all the time......
No cam in particular only ones that are na only and not classified as a blower cam like g6x3
VanquisherSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 07:28 PM   #6
Higgs Boson
Perpetual Order
 
Drives: indeed
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanquisherSS View Post
No cam in particular only ones that are na only and not classified as a blower cam like g6x3
some you can but the more overlap you have the less ideal it will be.

any cam will work. some cams will work much much better than others.

a cam with positive overlap will still make power but you will be blowing a lot of combustible mixture and boost right out the open exhaust valve and not meet the potential of your combination.

as Chris Rock once said, you can drive with your feet if you want to, that don't make it a good f'n idea.....
Higgs Boson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:15 PM   #7
Smoky10
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 745
How would a 231/236 TSP cam work? Would it cause problems?
Smoky10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:17 PM   #8
Higgs Boson
Perpetual Order
 
Drives: indeed
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoky10 View Post
How would a 231/236 TSP cam work? Would it cause problems?
what lsa? you will need a lsa of 117 to avoid positive overlap. then you may run into piston to valve clearance issues. you can probably run that on a 114 and be ok. get down into the 110 and lower range and I would recommend against it. it's all a grey as when it comes to cams. it's gradual shifts not a hard line of right or wrong.
Higgs Boson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:29 PM   #9
Smoky10
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 745
I am running a 112 LSA, and I am wanting to S/C my car...but was thinking that I would have to change out my cam. But ya'll are saying that it wouldn't hurt to run my particular cam?
Smoky10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:44 PM   #10
Higgs Boson
Perpetual Order
 
Drives: indeed
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoky10 View Post
I am running a 112 LSA, and I am wanting to S/C my car...but was thinking that I would have to change out my cam. But ya'll are saying that it wouldn't hurt to run my particular cam?
you can do it but it won't be optimal. it's not that big of a deal. blower cams are for when you have a blower or know for sure you are getting one. if you have a smallish cam and then later decide you want a blower, it's not the end of the world.

overlap bleeds off cylinder pressure and when you absolutely need to have more dynamic compression, you carefully match your camshaft to your purposes. buying a named cam is ballpark. true custom cams don't have names. that cam is just the one that is ideal for your exact combination.

dare I say the difference between a custom tune and a handheld tune in a can (can of tune-a?), sort of the same conceptual difference.
Higgs Boson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 09:54 PM   #11
Smoky10
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 745
Ok, so you are saying the cam will run...but if wouldn't be the best cam to use. But that if I had a good tuner they may be able to play with it a bit?
Smoky10 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 10:14 PM   #12
Higgs Boson
Perpetual Order
 
Drives: indeed
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
Quote:
Originally Posted by Smoky10 View Post
Ok, so you are saying the cam will run...but if wouldn't be the best cam to use. But that if I had a good tuner they may be able to play with it a bit?
oh yeah it will run for sure. the only issue is it might not make as much power as a proper cam. how much power difference is all theory until a cam swap takes place and is retuned and dynod. proven theory, mind you.
Higgs Boson is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 10:15 PM   #13
Pro Stock John
Writer
 
Pro Stock John's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
If I had a 231/236//112 TSP cam I would leave it in if I was doing a blower.

I think the overlap will help keep the power band down at the expense of a little peak power.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II
13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock
12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune
12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune
11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts
10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800
Pro Stock John is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-23-2012, 11:01 PM   #14
VanquisherSS
Hasbin of Stock Bottom HP
 
Drives: CTS-V Coupe, 04 TT Viper
Join Date: May 2011
Location: NJ
Posts: 2,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pro Stock John View Post
If I had a 231/236//112 TSP cam I would leave it in if I was doing a blower.

I think the overlap will help keep the power band down at the expense of a little peak power.
Agreed.
VanquisherSS is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:04 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.