08-23-2012, 03:43 PM | #1 |
Hasbin of Stock Bottom HP
|
Thoughts on Boosting a NA Only Cam
Just as the title says, anyone boost a NA only cam? Looking to push low boost maybe 5-7lbs. Please don't suggest any blower cams just want to know if someone has done this. Thanks all.
|
08-23-2012, 03:58 PM | #2 |
Perpetual Order
Drives: indeed Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
|
well what cam? a stock cam is not a "blower cam" but it can be used.... it's all about the specs.....
u ru wondering if someone "has done this." all the time...... |
08-23-2012, 04:09 PM | #3 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
You can easily do this. If you do some searching you can find articles by Richard Holdener writing mostly for Hot Rod where he's tested an NA combo and then added a blower or a turbo. I personally think it's no big deal for a blower, but for a turbo the LSA might give up some power.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 Last edited by Pro Stock John; 08-26-2012 at 07:46 PM. |
08-23-2012, 06:05 PM | #4 |
Account Suspended
Drives: 2012 Camaro RS, RX supercharged Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 6,063
|
We build budget 5.3 motors with take out C5 Z06 cams and turbo 12-18# boost...everything else bone stock except fuel inj, fuel pump, and use a LS6 IM and see 600-800 whp.
|
08-23-2012, 06:58 PM | #5 |
Hasbin of Stock Bottom HP
|
|
08-23-2012, 07:28 PM | #6 | |
Perpetual Order
Drives: indeed Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
|
Quote:
any cam will work. some cams will work much much better than others. a cam with positive overlap will still make power but you will be blowing a lot of combustible mixture and boost right out the open exhaust valve and not meet the potential of your combination. as Chris Rock once said, you can drive with your feet if you want to, that don't make it a good f'n idea..... |
|
08-23-2012, 09:15 PM | #7 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 745
|
How would a 231/236 TSP cam work? Would it cause problems?
|
08-23-2012, 09:17 PM | #8 |
Perpetual Order
Drives: indeed Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
|
what lsa? you will need a lsa of 117 to avoid positive overlap. then you may run into piston to valve clearance issues. you can probably run that on a 114 and be ok. get down into the 110 and lower range and I would recommend against it. it's all a grey as when it comes to cams. it's gradual shifts not a hard line of right or wrong.
|
08-23-2012, 09:29 PM | #9 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 745
|
I am running a 112 LSA, and I am wanting to S/C my car...but was thinking that I would have to change out my cam. But ya'll are saying that it wouldn't hurt to run my particular cam?
|
08-23-2012, 09:44 PM | #10 | |
Perpetual Order
Drives: indeed Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
|
Quote:
overlap bleeds off cylinder pressure and when you absolutely need to have more dynamic compression, you carefully match your camshaft to your purposes. buying a named cam is ballpark. true custom cams don't have names. that cam is just the one that is ideal for your exact combination. dare I say the difference between a custom tune and a handheld tune in a can (can of tune-a?), sort of the same conceptual difference. |
|
08-23-2012, 09:54 PM | #11 |
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Navarre, FL
Posts: 745
|
Ok, so you are saying the cam will run...but if wouldn't be the best cam to use. But that if I had a good tuner they may be able to play with it a bit?
|
08-23-2012, 10:14 PM | #12 |
Perpetual Order
Drives: indeed Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Texas Hill Country
Posts: 1,277
|
oh yeah it will run for sure. the only issue is it might not make as much power as a proper cam. how much power difference is all theory until a cam swap takes place and is retuned and dynod. proven theory, mind you.
|
08-23-2012, 10:15 PM | #13 |
Writer
Drives: 2010 SS / 1967 Camaro Join Date: May 2009
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 7,216
|
If I had a 231/236//112 TSP cam I would leave it in if I was doing a blower.
I think the overlap will help keep the power band down at the expense of a little peak power.
__________________
PROJECT HEAVY CHEVY
Camaro Now: Mods for the Masses Part I | Part II 13.15@106 1.95 | 100% Stock 12.37@112 1.85 | + Kooks Headers/Cats + 20" 555R + CAI + BW TB + UDP + Tune 12.06@113 1.70 | + CD 3200 + 18" NT05R + RCR Intake + NE OTR + GPI Tune 11.84@115 1.59 | + 3.91s + Race Star 17x7 Fronts 10.90@125 1.47 | + GPI VVT Cam + BW Ported Heads + CD 3800 |
08-23-2012, 11:01 PM | #14 |
Hasbin of Stock Bottom HP
|
|
|
|
|
|