Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Vararam
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-01-2014, 09:03 AM   #1
tribaltalon
 
tribaltalon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: CenTex
Posts: 40
car feels slow 0-60... tq management/powerhop?

Im working with a 2010 camaro ss m6 with longtubes, 3" catback and a CAI tuned by SWG Automotive. I took it to the track last weekend and averaged 2.0-2.1 60 fts (best was a 1.92 60ft) on stock tires and suspension but I could feel the car slack off immediately after launching. First gear on every run felt slow, and then took off once I got into 2nd. the best run I managed was a 13.07 at 109 mph. Ive been drag racing for years and just cant figure it out. Did any of yall have a similiar problem? Do I need to turn off tq management and powerhop all together or just reduce the settings? I really feel like with a full pass the car would easily run mid 12s at 114 or so.


Last edited by tribaltalon; 07-01-2014 at 09:14 AM.
tribaltalon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-01-2014, 02:18 PM   #2
Iam Broke
PHAT B33
 
Iam Broke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 TF3 Camaro 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dark of the Moon
Posts: 1,460
Yep, get rid of all the nannies. It'll help.

No wheel hop here since installing BMR subframe connectors & rear trailing (spherical bearing) arms.
__________________
Another 1 of 371 '12 T3 LS3 M6's built.
Iam Broke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 03:00 PM   #3
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribaltalon View Post
Im working with a 2010 camaro ss m6 with longtubes, 3" catback and a CAI tuned by SWG Automotive. I took it to the track last weekend and averaged 2.0-2.1 60 fts (best was a 1.92 60ft) on stock tires and suspension but I could feel the car slack off immediately after launching. First gear on every run felt slow, and then took off once I got into 2nd. the best run I managed was a 13.07 at 109 mph. Ive been drag racing for years and just cant figure it out. Did any of yall have a similiar problem? Do I need to turn off tq management and powerhop all together or just reduce the settings? I really feel like with a full pass the car would easily run mid 12s at 114 or so.

Try holding the traction control button down for 8 seconds while Idling.

Both traction control and stabil trac lights will come on the dash and all the Nannies are Shut off.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 03:56 PM   #4
tribaltalon
 
tribaltalon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: CenTex
Posts: 40
I did that. 60ft improved with everything off but still felt loss of power after launch. best way I can describe it is a laggy turbo setup where you launch on boost then it takes forever to get going again. It's been a few years since my last drag car but I've never had this much trouble. The tuner said he adjusted the tq management imwhen he tuned the car but hed mess with it some more. he also theorized that the aluminum K&N CAI might be causing high IAT's and pulling timing until the car starts getting cool air around 50-60mph. I tried icing the intake manifold and intake tube but it didnt really seem to make a huge difference.
tribaltalon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 05:41 PM   #5
Iam Broke
PHAT B33
 
Iam Broke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 TF3 Camaro 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dark of the Moon
Posts: 1,460
Turning off the TC & Stabilitrack still leaves the stock tune tq management in place. Sorry, but to get rid of it you gotta tune it.
Under 3k rpm there is a lot of restriction stock. See attached.
Attached Images
 
__________________
Another 1 of 371 '12 T3 LS3 M6's built.
Iam Broke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 06:06 PM   #6
hazzard623
 
hazzard623's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2ss/rs Black l99
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: phoenix
Posts: 35
So what does a tuned layout look like?
hazzard623 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-02-2014, 09:32 PM   #7
Iam Broke
PHAT B33
 
Iam Broke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 TF3 Camaro 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dark of the Moon
Posts: 1,460
Whatever you wish, I maxed out the tables on mine and let my right foot control it.
__________________
Another 1 of 371 '12 T3 LS3 M6's built.
Iam Broke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2014, 09:49 AM   #8
tribaltalon
 
tribaltalon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: CenTex
Posts: 40
did you leave the powerhop alone? whats the difference netween powerhop and tq management
tribaltalon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2014, 01:24 PM   #9
Iam Broke
PHAT B33
 
Iam Broke's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 TF3 Camaro 2SS/RS M6
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dark of the Moon
Posts: 1,460
Powerhop senses the oscillation of load from the wheel hop and closes the throttle to stop it. I disabled it also, only nanny I left in the tune was oil starvation.
__________________
Another 1 of 371 '12 T3 LS3 M6's built.
Iam Broke is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-03-2014, 10:21 PM   #10
tribaltalon
 
tribaltalon's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: CenTex
Posts: 40
hm. well the tuner said he already had disabled TQ management completely so there goes that theory. I decided to change out the cai from the aluminum K&N typhoon to a LMR CAI thats plastic/carbon fiber wrap. The tuner theorized that maybe heat soak/high IAT's are pulling timing until I get up to 40-50mph and cool air starts flowing. The K&N does get HOT to the touch.
tribaltalon is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-06-2014, 08:48 AM   #11
Tampa Tuning
Account Suspended
 
Drives: TAMPA TUNING FACEBOOK & INSTAGRAM
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Tampa, Fl
Posts: 3,044
Tampa Corvette Camaro CTV GTO SS tuner

Quote:
Originally Posted by tribaltalon View Post
The tuner theorized that maybe heat soak/high IAT's are pulling timing until I get up to 40-50mph and cool air starts flowing. The K&N does get HOT to the touch.
That's what I was going to say. I modify the IAT calibration in the table. Your stock IAT table starts to remove 2* of timing when it determines the IAT temperature raise to 86 degrees. Heck that's almost start up temperatures in the Tampa summers. It pulls 7 degrees of timing at 122 IAT temperature. If you car is warmed up, and your stopped at a traffic light for 2-3 minutes, you quickly get up to 140 degrees of engine bay temperatures which pulls 8 degrees of timing.

The other side of the coin, why does your feel faster in the colder months. Obviously colder denser air, but your calibration starts to add timing below 59 degrees IAT.

Phil
Tampa Tuning is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-07-2014, 08:23 AM   #12
JANNETTYRACING

 
JANNETTYRACING's Avatar
 
Drives: BLUE CAMARO ZL1 1LE M6
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: ON THE DYNO WATERBURY CT.
Posts: 15,224
Quote:
Originally Posted by tribaltalon View Post
hm. well the tuner said he already had disabled TQ management completely so there goes that theory. I decided to change out the cai from the aluminum K&N typhoon to a LMR CAI thats plastic/carbon fiber wrap. The tuner theorized that maybe heat soak/high IAT's are pulling timing until I get up to 40-50mph and cool air starts flowing. The K&N does get HOT to the touch.
The Best intake system we found is the CAI Brand for IAT control.

Ted.
__________________
www.jannettyracing.com
Celebrating 37 years Performance parts, Installation, Fabrication, Dyno tuning, Remote custom tuning, and alignments. 203-753-7223 Waterbury CT. 06705
email tedj@jannettyracing.com
JANNETTYRACING is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 09:15 AM   #13
f5journal
Senior Camaro Fanatic
 
f5journal's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 SS/RS manual - White
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: aiken, sc
Posts: 1,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tampa Tuning View Post
That's what I was going to say. I modify the IAT calibration in the table. Your stock IAT table starts to remove 2* of timing when it determines the IAT temperature raise to 86 degrees. Heck that's almost start up temperatures in the Tampa summers. It pulls 7 degrees of timing at 122 IAT temperature. If you car is warmed up, and your stopped at a traffic light for 2-3 minutes, you quickly get up to 140 degrees of engine bay temperatures which pulls 8 degrees of timing.

The other side of the coin, why does your feel faster in the colder months. Obviously colder denser air, but your calibration starts to add timing below 59 degrees IAT.

Phil

Thank-you for this informative post
__________________
Former '68 and '69 Z/28 Owner...........Now sporting around in a 2011 RS/SS with........Kooks LT's and cats, JRE tune, CAI, scoop, ZL1 Bumper conversion, custom ZL-1 grille, halo harness, Painted silver stripes, GM GFX, black painted lower edge of skirts and rear bumper. MGW shifter.....and now a 3.91 1LE diff
f5journal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-08-2014, 09:25 AM   #14
2SS2010
 
Drives: 2010 2 SS
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Georgia
Posts: 594
Quote:
Originally Posted by JANNETTYRACING View Post
The Best intake system we found is the CAI Brand for IAT control.

Ted.

Do you see any issues with heat soak on the MAF with the CAI brand? Anyone actually take temps inside the CAI box vs the actual engine compartment? Does the inside box temp become irrelevant inside the tube that goers into the TB?
2SS2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:19 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.