06-30-2009, 07:54 PM | #43 |
racingray
Drives: 1968 camaro ss Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Johnstown Pa
Posts: 73
|
thats alot for that kit. years ago these kits were only $ 4000 whats the big difference probably not too much, I cant believe how these prices just keep going up and up. I hope nobody buys this kit so that procharger realizes that they are over the market.
|
06-30-2009, 08:24 PM | #44 |
Taking it 1 day at a time
Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro 2SS/RS Auto Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 751
|
I know. I thought prices were DEflating not inflating.
__________________
Order#: NJWGTF
1100, Preliminary order accepted 04/27/2009 6000, Delivered to the customer 07/23/2009 - 3 Months (worth the wait!!) |
07-02-2009, 08:23 PM | #45 |
Drives: 2009 Corvette, 1987 Buick GN Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 197
|
Uh, where have you been, our gov't is printing money like crazy. Some analysts are warning that there may be hyper inflation.
I don't think $6k is bad for the kit at all. If you are waiting for a $3k supercharger kit you may be waiting a looong time. |
07-02-2009, 11:53 PM | #46 |
Drives: . Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ventura, Ca
Posts: 327
|
I agree $6k is not too bad, but the price is closer to $7k.
__________________
|
07-03-2009, 12:02 AM | #47 |
Drives: 2009 Corvette, 1987 Buick GN Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Corona, California
Posts: 197
|
Aren't the other kits priced at $8-9k for the new Camaro?
|
07-03-2009, 12:23 AM | #48 | |
Drives: 2008 TT Porsche Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Lake Forest
Posts: 22
|
Reply
Quote:
|
|
07-03-2009, 08:41 AM | #49 |
Petro-sexual
|
Hmm... I know my tuner's been using them for several years, but I'm going to check with him regarding this too. It's too bad what happened to your 'Vette though and the response it sounds like you had.
That head unit looks similar to what I've seen in the past. That being said, what I don't like is having to pull the head in order to change the oil within. I thought I remembered the interval was something like every 6,000 miles, but I don't have to pull my rear end to change the fluid so I just have a little bit of a hard time with that. Don't get me wrong though - I don't much like the idea of having to tap into the oil pan either that I remember some other centrifugals either. I know these babies perform; I don't think that's too arguable. I'm just curious to still see the numbers.
__________________
'20 ZL1 Black "Fury" A10, PDR, Exposed CF Extractor Magnuson Magnum DI TVS2650R // RFBG // Soler 103 // TooHighPSI Port Injection // THPSI Billet Lid // FF // Katech Drop-In // PLM Heat Exchanger // ZLE Cradle bushings // BMR Chassis-Suspension Stuff // aFe Bars // Diode Dynamics LEDs // ACS Composites Guards // CF Dash // Aeroforce // tint // other stuffs |
07-06-2009, 07:58 PM | #50 |
Master of Medicine
Drives: 4th Gen Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 784
|
2 comments...these type S/C produce power in a turbo(esc) way...ie in a linear fashion, they don't produce the raw low end torque of a roots type blower, but they will make very strong power 3-4K up and make more peak power than a PD blower. Since this is a heavy car, the question I have is which one will "run" better, product better power under the curve (more average power).
2nd...the price is or should be very attractive...you boys looked at the TVS pricing? This is extremely comparable if not cheaper than TVS's...so I'd say its a pretty good deal. There is a local vette on stock short block that is running mid 10-s at 130+ with one of these things....lots a miles on the stock short block..
__________________
2002 Camaro SS. 408 LS2. 500+RWHP/480RWTQ. Full UMI RR suspension. Koni/Strano. 295F/315R. 3500#(55/45)
|
07-06-2009, 09:13 PM | #51 | |
Drives: Summit White 1SS Soon Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
The way I see it, and this is just my opinion... Roots and twin screws are going to give you that instant burst of low end torque while still maintaining a decent gain higher up. Depending on how you drive this may be what you're looking for. I can see that setup having major traction issues on the Camaro.. Refer to the SS vs GT500 video. Traction issues made that bastard run slower than it should on paper. Another good read is the edmunds test of the HPE 550. Now, the centrifugals, like you said, gain power more in a linear fashion like a turbo. You will still gain some low end torque over stock so it will have worse traction than stock... but not nearly as bad as the PD blowers.. The large gains come mid to high range. I can see that setup being quicker in the fact that you will be able to control traction easier, which will get you into that higher rpm range quicker where you're gonna pull like a mofo. But after all thats just my opinion and it's probably |
|
07-06-2009, 10:17 PM | #52 |
Master of Medicine
Drives: 4th Gen Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 784
|
Kinda my point is that in a 1/4 mile situation that is not traction limited (ie you run a DR and aren't scared to possibly break your rear/tranny/driveshaft etc), since this is such a heavy car, and requires such torque to move the thing out of the hole, and 60' creates winning ET's that the PD blower may have the edge in the 1/4....the centri- may have the edge on the roll races....JMHO...
__________________
2002 Camaro SS. 408 LS2. 500+RWHP/480RWTQ. Full UMI RR suspension. Koni/Strano. 295F/315R. 3500#(55/45)
|
07-06-2009, 10:42 PM | #53 | |
Banned
Drives: 2006 Mustang GT Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: South Louisiana
Posts: 522
|
Quote:
I'm a little over the 450 RWHP threshhold (485RWHP) on stock intrenals pushing 9.7 lbs. boost. Borrowed time--maybe Good tune-- Definitely There are quite a few Mustangs running 450-500 RWHP on stock motors. |
|
07-06-2009, 11:48 PM | #54 | |
Drives: Summit White 1SS Soon Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 52
|
Quote:
If we're talking about power lvls between 500-600RWHP, sounds like a drivers race to me, but I think I may give it to the pd blower (if u got slicks). |
|
07-07-2009, 03:51 PM | #55 |
Drives: toyota Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: NJ
Posts: 298
|
I just got off the phone with Procharger; the $6,896 is for the full kit + tune, they also sell just a tuner kit which is everything minus the fuel components for $6,196.
|
07-07-2009, 04:15 PM | #56 | ||
Drives: . Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Ventura, Ca
Posts: 327
|
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
V6 Camaro Performance Upgrades | rtcat600man | Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 387 | 09-19-2019 06:53 PM |
Camaro Laws | ChevyNut | Off-topic Discussions | 107 | 11-09-2016 05:40 PM |
GM memo to dealers | Moose | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 41 | 02-04-2010 07:33 PM |
Detroit News panel wants GM to build Camaro concept | Tran | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 12 | 03-15-2009 04:38 PM |
Q&A with fbodfather (Scott Settlemire) regarding upcoming Camaro | JustinZS | 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions | 22 | 05-20-2008 07:48 PM |