Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Roto-Fab
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-27-2013, 02:52 PM   #1
HAMBO

 
HAMBO's Avatar
 
Drives: Supercharged 2013 AGM 2SS/RS
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 786
Cost of Turbo vs. Super?

Hi everyone,

Have been looking around, and have seen a few threads saying S/Cs typically cost less than Turbos.

From a quick scan of different mods sites, I see turbo kits like Turbonetics for <$6K, and bunch of S/C kits (maggie, whipple) for ~$7.5K. Am I missing some piece of the cost? Guessing it costs more to install / maintain a turbo?

If anyone has any real numbers to compare would be much appreciated.

Thanks for any help!
__________________
2013 AGM 2SS/RS
SLP TVS2300, Edge CAI, 3" Magnaflow catback, BC Racing BR series coilovers, HRE FF15's (20x10 square) with Michelin Pilot Sport 4S's, GM STB, BMR front and rear sway bars and toe links, Prothane subframe bushings and front control arm inserts, JDP rear upper control arm bushings, Elite Engineering catch can. Tuned by Cunningham Motorsports.
1967 Bolero Red 396 SS/RS Convertible
HAMBO is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2013, 03:04 PM   #2
Mark114

 
Mark114's Avatar
 
Drives: 2016 2SS Convertible
Join Date: May 2012
Location: St. Louis, MO
Posts: 1,711
I don’t have numbers, but the centrifugal SCs like IPF can be less expensive due to simpler installation compared to turbos, maggie, or whipple. Tuning a turbo, maggie, or whipple may be more complex (and expensive) than the tune included in the IPF SC. The trade-off is that power output with centrifugal SC may be lower than turbo or PD SC.
Mark114 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-27-2013, 03:21 PM   #3
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
Install is easy, maintence is no more.

It gets to be an even bigger difference when you start to add headers, 8 ribs, pulleys, tensioners, heat exchangers, spacers, od rear kits, cold airs, etc.

As for the IPF stuff, this the v8 section, not v6 section. Not even sure they make v8 kits.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-28-2013, 06:10 PM   #4
1969to2010
The Man in Black
 
1969to2010's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 Camaro 2010 Camaro 1SS
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Long Island NY
Posts: 2,016
I have a turbonetics t76 kit and outside of the kit cost and install
You'll need a
Boost controller/boost gauge
Wide band
A pillar gauge pod


I'd suggest other mods (same as sc cars) would be suspension work. You don't want to add all that power with out beefing up the suspension
I added
Trailing arms
Toe links
11 inch rims
Subframe bushings


With a sc set up you'll most likely add a cold air intake and headers my turbo kit uses stock manifolds and utilizes the stock parts for the air intake. I used a cold air inductions filter instead. Headers can be expensive too. One of my favorite features of the turbo is I can crank up the power for the situation I'm in with the boost controller.

Either way keep in mind once you add any forced induction the game changes and the car becomes a money Pitt good luck

Either way you go think out your supporting mods. Pm me if you have any turbo questions
__________________
1969to2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-29-2013, 09:29 PM   #5
partymn

 
partymn's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 1ss 1LE
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Goose Creek, SC
Posts: 878
I'm all about the supporting mods at this point. I didn't listen, again, and went turbo and now my car can not put the power to the road. Sure 60 MPH burn outs are fun and impressive, but a car with 620 RWHP that still runs 12 second 1/4 mile times is hardly worth the expense.
__________________
2014 1SS 1LE, bone stock for now.
partymn is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 11:00 AM   #6
jessrayo
Speed Freak
 
jessrayo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
The bottom line for cost is how much power do you want to make. It is much more expensive to go up in small steps than to make big changes. Like everyone else has commented, it is not so much the cost of the turbo or supercharger but the cost of the exhaust and intake mods and all the cooling changes and fuel pumps and injectors and clutches, blocks, rods and pistons....

I personally think the superchargers are a little less money for moderate horsepower gains. If you want big power (more than 750 whp) it would probably be cheaper to start straight out with the turbos.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq

2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date.

Last edited by jessrayo; 12-30-2013 at 11:22 AM.
jessrayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 11:36 AM   #7
STSL
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 ZR1 Camaro
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Everywhere, USA
Posts: 163
Quote:
Originally Posted by partymn View Post
I'm all about the supporting mods at this point. I didn't listen, again, and went turbo and now my car can not put the power to the road. Sure 60 MPH burn outs are fun and impressive, but a car with 620 RWHP that still runs 12 second 1/4 mile times is hardly worth the expense.
Im afraid even with suspension your not going to get great times with a turbo and a clutch.Give me a call and ill give you some tips on rear alignment the will get you headed in the right direction.
STSL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 12:42 PM   #8
jessrayo
Speed Freak
 
jessrayo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 ZL1 Camaro, 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Ardmore, OK
Posts: 2,637
Quote:
Originally Posted by partymn View Post
I'm all about the supporting mods at this point. I didn't listen, again, and went turbo and now my car can not put the power to the road. Sure 60 MPH burn outs are fun and impressive, but a car with 620 RWHP that still runs 12 second 1/4 mile times is hardly worth the expense.
Are you on drag radials? If you want respectable 1/4 mile times you have got to switch to a drag tire or you will NEVER get the car to hook.
__________________
2016 SS -AGP twin Borg Warner 7163 EFR's, LT4 mechanical pump, LT4 injectors, Walbro 255 low side, Castrol SRF. 734whp/759 tq

2013 ZL1 -ADM - 427 LSX 6 bolt, O-ringed block built by LME. Twin PT6466 turbos. RPM custom manual trans, RPS Quad carbon clutch, 9" Hendrix rear diff & axles. ADM/squash fuel system, Ron Davis radiator, Spal fans, AGP air to air, turbo plumbing. LPE oil cooler, rear bushing upgrade, roll bar...etc. rwhp 1400+... 212.5mph, best Texas mile to date.
jessrayo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-30-2013, 01:09 PM   #9
Joe@CPR.com
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 03 vette, 94 trans am, 04 gto
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mesa, AZ
Posts: 995
AGP base kit for a manual is $7500 and we include shipping. includes everything needed for install, if you want to add gauges or a boost controller you easily can for not much more. Install is roughly 10-12 hours.
Joe@CPR.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-02-2014, 11:20 PM   #10
CyberPredator
50 Shades of Prey
 
Drives: TT/SS
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Between 10 and 20 PSI
Posts: 777
OP Twin turbo kits are the ones that you hear of that are more than a supercharger. Superchargers catch up quick in price though when you need supporting mods to make the same power as bolting on a turbo kit.
__________________
Futral Motorsports built and tuned
CyberPredator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 02:17 AM   #11
11TexaSS

 
11TexaSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011RedJewel, FI
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: San Antonio,TX
Posts: 816
Either way it gets pricy. Figure out your goals and go that direction. Like it's said, " you gotta pay to play"!
11TexaSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 08:58 AM   #12
TheMeat
 
TheMeat's Avatar
 
Drives: 1973 Camaro
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Tucson AZ
Posts: 114
Quote:
Originally Posted by partymn View Post
I'm all about the supporting mods at this point. I didn't listen, again, and went turbo and now my car can not put the power to the road. Sure 60 MPH burn outs are fun and impressive, but a car with 620 RWHP that still runs 12 second 1/4 mile times is hardly worth the expense.
See this a lot.
__________________
73 Camaro, 6.0 LS, Billet S485, E85, 4L80E.
TheMeat is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 09:11 AM   #13
Unreal


 
Drives: 2006 Z06
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Gilbert, AZ
Posts: 5,712
600-650 isn't that hard to hook. Tires and maybe some bushings do wonders. Tires alone will hook 600rwhp. It amazes me how many people try to go fast on stock tires/wheels.
__________________
Nick
Corvette Z06 -1200ish rwhp
Unreal is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-03-2014, 10:25 AM   #14
Detoxx03
ЯєŧąяĐ Єl¡m¡иąŧøя ™
 
Detoxx03's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Corvette
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Woodward Avenue
Posts: 876
Quote:
Originally Posted by Unreal View Post
600-650 isn't that hard to hook. Tires and maybe some bushings do wonders. Tires alone will hook 600rwhp. It amazes me how many people try to go fast on stock tires/wheels.

__________________

D1SC Procharger 932/758 on E85
A Futral Motorsports Creation
https://www.facebook.com/DetoxxAtomic
Detoxx03 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:46 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.