[pwrmanpaul66]

I had car put on dyno this weekend for a base line and it put down pretty good numbers what have others put down ? Completely stock M-6 3000 miles on the clock ! 412 hp and 416 trq !

[Nwgr84]

Nice!
Impressive numbers for at the wheel vs. published hp / torque.

[Richard0nee]

Nice! Do you know if it was a mustang dyno or dyno jet?

[jaysonstuart]

Are you at altitude or sea-level?

[Razzaa]

Originally Posted by Richard0nee

Nice! Do you know if it was a mustang dyno or dyno jet?

Originally Posted by jaysonstuart

Are you at altitude or sea-level?

What they said!!!

[Zeke.Malvo]

Originally Posted by pwrmanpaul66

I had car put on dyno this weekend for a base line and it put down pretty good numbers what have others put down ? Completely stock M-6 3000 miles on the clock ! 412 hp and 416 trq !

Those aren't bad numbers at all. BTW, STP correction is pretty generous, corrected to the more commonly used standard of SAE comes out to 396 rwhp / 399 rwtq

[stars_fan]

30 seconds on the tuners website and you guys could have answered these questions yourself.

Their in Des Moines, IA and per google the altitude is 955'. They use a superflow dyno per their page.

[pwrmanpaul66]

Originally Posted by stars_fan

30 seconds on the tuners website and you guys could have answered these questions yourself.

Their in Des Moines, IA and per google the altitude is 955'. They use a superflow dyno per their page.

Thanks for answering their questions !

[mjmenke]

Sounded great on the dyno.

I'm betting the numbers would be higher on a better day. Weather wasn't the greatest for dyno numbers IMO.

https://goo.gl/photos/X3AJEgafA7sZviPW6

[KoolHyperBlue]

Beautiful numbers for power at the rear wheels . Usually they say a car can loose at least 15-18% HP before it gets to the rear wheels so that's impressive numbers and would be less then what experts say

[IOMike]

Originally Posted by Zeke.Malvo

Those aren't bad numbers at all. BTW, STP correction is pretty generous, corrected to the more commonly used standard of SAE comes out to 396 rwhp / 399 rwtq

Not sure how you're converting to SAE, but I have never seen that large of a swing between the two.

[Zeke.Malvo]

Originally Posted by IOMike

Not sure how you're converting to SAE, but I have never seen that large of a swing between the two.

STP is the most generous correction factor, look it up if you don't believe me. It's easy to calculate, it's all %.

The most commonly used correction factor is SAE, then STD, and then STP. STP shows even higher numbers than STD.

[Zeke.Malvo]

Originally Posted by mjmenke

Sounded great on the dyno.

I'm betting the numbers would be higher on a better day. Weather wasn't the greatest for dyno numbers IMO.

https://goo.gl/photos/X3AJEgafA7sZviPW6

Weather isn't a factor at all. That's the whole idea of the correction factor, it corrects the power to a standard air density. With better weather, your uncorrected numbers would be higher, but your corrected numbers (SAE, STD, STP) would stay the same.

[Zeke.Malvo]

Originally Posted by KoolHyperBlue

Beautiful numbers for power at the rear wheels . Usually they say a car can loose at least 15-18% HP before it gets to the rear wheels so that's impressive numbers and would be less then what experts say

This isn't the 60's with 3 spd C6 and TH400 autos with fat 4000 rpm tq converters lol modern transmissions have closer to 10-12% losses. And that's if losses are even straight percentages, which has been debated forever. Some say hp losses are a fixed number (~60hp).

Either way, with most engines being SAE Certified now, we now know what they make down to 1%. So driveline losses are even easier to figure out.