Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Bigwormgraphix
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Forced Induction - V8


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-17-2010, 09:45 AM   #1
ddavis
boostalicious
 
ddavis's Avatar
 
Drives: Blown Ls3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area SF
Posts: 1,030
Numbers on ls3 with stock maggie tune & kit?

Seems like most get tuned after the install. Anybody know the numbers with the stock tune sent for the maggie on a completely stock ls3?
ddavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 09:51 AM   #2
Iwantone2
Voice Of The Voiceless
 
Iwantone2's Avatar
 
Drives: CGM 1SS RS
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: OC Cali
Posts: 9,617
It's a very conservative tune and my guess is that it would be in the mid 400's
__________________
Iwantone2 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 09:54 AM   #3
Nine Ball


 
Nine Ball's Avatar
 
Drives: 1969 & 2016 Camaro SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,849
We installed a TVS2300 on an otherwise stock Camaro (LS3, manual) and I believe it made 460 rwhp with the Maggie tune. It was running really conservative and rich. With a dyno tune, it picked up 20 more. Put a 3.6" pulley on it (stock is 3.8") and it made 510.
__________________
Fquick.com/NineBall
Nine Ball is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-17-2010, 10:08 AM   #4
ddavis
boostalicious
 
ddavis's Avatar
 
Drives: Blown Ls3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area SF
Posts: 1,030
Thanks guys, just what I was looking for. You guys run 93 in the South correct? I wonder if that was the reason for running rich if the kit is tuned for cali 91 standards
ddavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010, 12:59 AM   #5
ddavis
boostalicious
 
ddavis's Avatar
 
Drives: Blown Ls3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area SF
Posts: 1,030
One more question, Im pretty much at sea level here in california and my car performance wise will be stock besides a catback exhaust and the maggie sc. If I go with a 3.6 pulley instead of the 3.8 will I run into fuel issues? Im guessing that would put me around 8.5psi?? Thoughts with this setup on a daily driver? Thanks guys
ddavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010, 01:09 AM   #6
2010SSRSM6


 
2010SSRSM6's Avatar
 
Drives: My wife crazy with my C5 usage.
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 6,558
Racer778 has a thread on here where he did a self install with the maggie tune and he put down the following with the L99:

Name:  Joe Calderon.jpg
Views: 426
Size:  83.4 KB
__________________
UNDER CONSTRUCTION......again......
2010SSRSM6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-18-2010, 10:52 AM   #7
LOUDMIKE
 
Drives: 2010 2ss, 1967 ss427, 1968 327
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 22
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddavis View Post
One more question, Im pretty much at sea level here in california and my car performance wise will be stock besides a catback exhaust and the maggie sc. If I go with a 3.6 pulley instead of the 3.8 will I run into fuel issues? Im guessing that would put me around 8.5psi?? Thoughts with this setup on a daily driver? Thanks guys

We just got one done yesterday. It had a 3.8 pulley. Adding more boost or a smaller pulley will push your injectors and fuel pump to the limits. Boost a pumps and a bigger injectors are there to fix that. As a daily driver ? I can not answer that question. Most people dont have 500 rwhp as a driver. I could easily. Here is an example of a modded car we did.

2010 Camaro. L99 to LS3 conversion, blower cam, 1 7/8ths Kooks, Borla catback, catted mids, maggie 3.8 pulley (5 psi), stock fuel. 513/507. Very respectable. Very smooth. Added boost a pump and 3.4 pulley (8.5-9 psi). now 602/579 rwhp. Injectors maxed, stock torque convertor to limits, 91 octane but still very drivable.
LOUDMIKE is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2010, 01:12 AM   #8
ddavis
boostalicious
 
ddavis's Avatar
 
Drives: Blown Ls3
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Bay Area SF
Posts: 1,030
thanks for the info!
ddavis is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-19-2010, 12:53 PM   #9
alfie43

 
alfie43's Avatar
 
Drives: S/C 2SS/RS Camaro-6M-VicRed
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alfie (Mariano) lives in Shelby Twp, Metro-Detroit
Posts: 1,119
Send a message via ICQ to alfie43
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddavis View Post
Seems like most get tuned after the install. Anybody know the numbers with the stock tune sent for the maggie on a completely stock ls3?
Magnasun advertises 492 RWHP with their 2300 kit. Of course, that's with their supplied SCT tune on a totally stock LS3. Some people here have claimed to have pulled 500.

Because I had Kooks LTs (1-7/8"), Magnasun recommended a 3.6 pulley. With the headers, pulley, a CIA, and custom calibration, mine pulled 561 RWHP.

Alfie
__________________
alfie43 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply


Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ALL Our Camaros are GM Prefer Pricing (old Supplier Pricing) at MacMulkin Chevrolet! MacMulkin Dealer Camaros for Sale 0 01-20-2010 06:40 PM
2010 Camaro Stock Vs American Racing/Magnaflow Vs Vengeance Stage II Cam Kit..Results Ron@Vengeance Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 9 01-14-2010 01:00 PM
What do you think the MAX HP rating is on the stock LS3 Mayhem Matt Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 21 11-24-2009 02:39 PM
C6 LS3 Stock Dyno Numbers TomServo Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 23 01-22-2009 09:51 AM
LS3 goes 11`s Bonestock! GMRULZ Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 28 12-08-2008 09:10 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:57 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.