06-17-2010, 09:45 AM | #1 |
boostalicious
|
Numbers on ls3 with stock maggie tune & kit?
Seems like most get tuned after the install. Anybody know the numbers with the stock tune sent for the maggie on a completely stock ls3?
|
06-17-2010, 09:51 AM | #2 |
Voice Of The Voiceless
|
It's a very conservative tune and my guess is that it would be in the mid 400's
__________________
|
06-17-2010, 09:54 AM | #3 |
Drives: 1969 & 2016 Camaro SS Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 3,849
|
We installed a TVS2300 on an otherwise stock Camaro (LS3, manual) and I believe it made 460 rwhp with the Maggie tune. It was running really conservative and rich. With a dyno tune, it picked up 20 more. Put a 3.6" pulley on it (stock is 3.8") and it made 510.
__________________
Fquick.com/NineBall
|
06-17-2010, 10:08 AM | #4 |
boostalicious
|
Thanks guys, just what I was looking for. You guys run 93 in the South correct? I wonder if that was the reason for running rich if the kit is tuned for cali 91 standards
|
06-18-2010, 12:59 AM | #5 |
boostalicious
|
One more question, Im pretty much at sea level here in california and my car performance wise will be stock besides a catback exhaust and the maggie sc. If I go with a 3.6 pulley instead of the 3.8 will I run into fuel issues? Im guessing that would put me around 8.5psi?? Thoughts with this setup on a daily driver? Thanks guys
|
06-18-2010, 01:09 AM | #6 |
Drives: My wife crazy with my C5 usage. Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DFW
Posts: 6,558
|
Racer778 has a thread on here where he did a self install with the maggie tune and he put down the following with the L99:
__________________
UNDER CONSTRUCTION......again......
|
06-18-2010, 10:52 AM | #7 | |
Drives: 2010 2ss, 1967 ss427, 1968 327 Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Tempe, Arizona
Posts: 22
|
Quote:
We just got one done yesterday. It had a 3.8 pulley. Adding more boost or a smaller pulley will push your injectors and fuel pump to the limits. Boost a pumps and a bigger injectors are there to fix that. As a daily driver ? I can not answer that question. Most people dont have 500 rwhp as a driver. I could easily. Here is an example of a modded car we did. 2010 Camaro. L99 to LS3 conversion, blower cam, 1 7/8ths Kooks, Borla catback, catted mids, maggie 3.8 pulley (5 psi), stock fuel. 513/507. Very respectable. Very smooth. Added boost a pump and 3.4 pulley (8.5-9 psi). now 602/579 rwhp. Injectors maxed, stock torque convertor to limits, 91 octane but still very drivable. |
|
06-19-2010, 01:12 AM | #8 |
boostalicious
|
thanks for the info!
|
06-19-2010, 12:53 PM | #9 | |
Drives: S/C 2SS/RS Camaro-6M-VicRed Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Alfie (Mariano) lives in Shelby Twp, Metro-Detroit
Posts: 1,119
|
Quote:
Because I had Kooks LTs (1-7/8"), Magnasun recommended a 3.6 pulley. With the headers, pulley, a CIA, and custom calibration, mine pulled 561 RWHP. Alfie
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar Threads | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
ALL Our Camaros are GM Prefer Pricing (old Supplier Pricing) at MacMulkin Chevrolet! | MacMulkin | Dealer Camaros for Sale | 0 | 01-20-2010 06:40 PM |
2010 Camaro Stock Vs American Racing/Magnaflow Vs Vengeance Stage II Cam Kit..Results | Ron@Vengeance | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 9 | 01-14-2010 01:00 PM |
What do you think the MAX HP rating is on the stock LS3 | Mayhem Matt | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 21 | 11-24-2009 02:39 PM |
C6 LS3 Stock Dyno Numbers | TomServo | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 23 | 01-22-2009 09:51 AM |
LS3 goes 11`s Bonestock! | GMRULZ | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 28 | 12-08-2008 09:10 PM |