![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Forced Induction - V8 V8 Supercharger, turbo, nitrous discussions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
Philippians 4:13
Drives: SLP Supercharged LS3 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Motor City - Michigan
Posts: 1,991
|
tvs 1900 OR tvs 2300???
I'm in the market for a blower, as some of you know that have answered my many questions in recent days. My next question is this... Do I need the tvs 1900 OR tvs 2300? How far can I go with the 1900? What is the real difference between the two blowers? I am not planning on going crazy with the car. My plan was to be right there with the Z28 or GT500 out of the box but still be in the safe zone without worrying about blowing my engine. Will the 1900 offer me that or do I need to step it up to the 2300? Forgive me if my questions sound elementary, it;s just that the supercharger is a new chapter in the books for me. I appreciate all your guys help.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2SS/RS LS3 RJT Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 756
|
TVS2300. You will not damage your engine if properly installed and tuned.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Okie doke
|
I think the most popular choice is the 2300. I think MTI Racing used and modded the 1900 though with good results.
I think the 1900 will give you a little more low end and if you aren't going to go nuts, would work for you. I'd look at pricing and what you can get as I don't think you could go wrong either way. Crowley
__________________
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Philippians 4:13
Drives: SLP Supercharged LS3 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Motor City - Michigan
Posts: 1,991
|
Any more thoughts on this... from what I have been reading on the web it sounds like depending how far I want to go and if I am leaving the bottom end stock the 1900 is the way to go. Is there any truth behind this? I have even read that the 1900 is more efficent for applications like that. Keep in mind as far as I want to go is the blower, my Rot-fab, and custom tune. I don't even know if I would go as far as headers down the road.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Castle Rock, Colorado
Posts: 155
|
Quote:
By not swapping out to longtubes, you're leaving about 30-40rwhp on the table with a blower setup. While the factory manifolds flow well with the stock setup, they really start to restrict the power once you strap on a blower. Since your'e spending the money anyway, you might as well get the most bang for your buck. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,052
|
Sounds like the 1900 will do everything you want to do. It's a few dollars cheaper. The down side is that when you decide to get rid of it, the 1900 will "cost" you more than you saved on the front end.
The 2300 won't be any harder on your engine. Boost/power is what damages parts. The 2300 is perfectly capable of providing lots of fun at lower boost/power levels. Any differences in effeciencies or boost delivery will be really hard to notice. Personally, I can't see any sound reason to get the 1900. Maybe that's why you don't see many 1900's around .
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: Camaro SS2/RS orange/black stripes Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 506
|
Go with the 2300. Don't take the chance of not being able to add more HP if and when you need to. With the 2300 you can add anything you want without having the SC not be big enough. You say now you don't want to do much more but that is the same thing I use to say. Don't limit your future HP cause you might save a couple of hundred $$ now. Put the 2300 on now and get ready for more. Haven't you heard? HP is the new Crack Cocain. I'm about 550rwhp now and could stand a little more. My 2300 is doing it's job. Enjoy your new addiction. LOL!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
|
Philippians 4:13
Drives: SLP Supercharged LS3 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Motor City - Michigan
Posts: 1,991
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Maggie blown LS3 vette Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: SE TX
Posts: 1,052
|
Quote:
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Drives: 1SS/RS 2010 Camaro Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cape May, NJ
Posts: 57
|
I agree with Camaro54, its better to have the extra power and not use it, then not have it, and want the more power.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Rev-It-Up for Wounded Warriors Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: G4 CLASSIFIED
Posts: 4,472
|
I dont know if thier is a major price difference between the 1900 vs 2300, but the 2300 is more bang for the buck and you might try Tim at www.TandTperformance.com
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() ![]() |
2300 FTW!
__________________
2013 ZL1
BONE STOCK! LOLLast edited by dmax86; 08-18-2010 at 02:19 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
SoCal C5 Family Member
Drives: My wife crazy with my C5 usage. Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,194
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
|
SoCal C5 Family Member
Drives: My wife crazy with my C5 usage. Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,194
|
I am having the same question running through my head.
While at the American Muscle Car Challenge a Magnuson rep was on site and said that the 1900 was really all that was needed for the 6.2, but the 2300 leaves more room to grow. I guess it comes down to how confident you (we) are that you will be satisfied with the power that the 1900 delivers through the 6.2. As long as you don't go crazy (like some of the guys on here with huge built motors and swapping out 2-3 different SC setups) I think the 1900 would be fine. If you think one day you might want a 416 or larger engine, I say get what you will want for the final project and save some money in the long run. I'm just not sure there is enough of a price difference between the 1900 vs 2300 to warrant the possibility of having to buy two due to future upgrades. Best advice is find a shop you trust and get your final goals in mind and build toward them. As long as the huge HP/TQ bug doesn't bite me, I'll be shooting for 600/600 and calling it a day.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 Z06 Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Posts: 890
|
whats the price difference between both of them????
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,934
|
$600.00
Also (i think, will look into this more if needed) the 1900 does not require fuel injectors to be swapped out, the 2300 does.I have a customer with a GXP G8 who seems to be thinking the same way as the OP. He also does not want to put any undue stress on the engine. |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
Catch me if you can
|
I've been thinking of the same thing. I want to boost my car, but how much? This is my daily driver and I don't compete with my car. I'll do a few test and tune nights in the year and that's it.
I also don't want to dig into my engine, not yet or at least not for 10 years. I'm basicly looking from something that is going to give me a nice amount of boost with the least amount of added stress to the car. I'd like to stay around the 475 to 500 RWHP range.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
![]() Drives: Anything Blown Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: SoCal
Posts: 1,934
|
Just go 2300. You will be happier with it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: First 9 inch-12 bolt IRS Camaro Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: nc
Posts: 1,847
|
We wll have a complete test with our stock ls3 and the 1900,i have been very impressed with how snappy the 1900 is on the heavy camaro. We have some customers at 660 rwhp with a 1900 in a gto so there capable of great numbers.If i was keeping a stock bottom end and wanted to be safe i would lean towards the 1900.We are finishing up one more test with our bolt in 9 inch and then we will start a thread with the 1900 and how it responds to mods.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: Camaro SS2/RS orange/black stripes Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville KY
Posts: 506
|
I may be wrong but it seems I was told by a magnus rep that the 2300 was quiter than the 1900. Since I was not familiar with SCs I knew I didn't want a loud whining noise. So between the facts of quiter, handles more HP and great experience with the 2300s and the Camaro SS I was sold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Catch me if you can
|
No disrespect, but how is this helping me make an educated assessment between the 1900 and the 2300? I'm not interested in putting something on my car just because it can produce huge numbers. I want something that is going to last and not have to do a complete engine rebuild in 4 to 6 years from now.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Philippians 4:13
Drives: SLP Supercharged LS3 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Motor City - Michigan
Posts: 1,991
|
I'm sure I will be happy with any blower, I just don't want one that is going to be overkill for what I am looking accomplish. Why i this such a hard question to answere for even for the so called experts over there?. I can't believe this is the first time this question has been presented to them.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 2008 Z06 Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Oviedo, Florida
Posts: 890
|
i went with the 2300 based on thats what most have done and they have not had any issues. you can go with all stock setup on the 2300, get the warranty from magnacharger and be safe...
also in the future when you want to sell your car you can pull off the 2300 and i think there will be a more demand on the 2300 to sell later on...
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 | |||
![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Transformers Edition Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Mass
Posts: 1,048
|
Quote:
Quote:
That's probably because the 1900 would have to spin faster to make the same psi at all rpms on a 6.2L and because of this the 1900 probably runs hotter. Because of both these things , I'm guessing, the 2300 would be better. Quote:
Will a 1900 support a 415 or 416 motor at 6 psi ?
__________________
The Yellow Camaro Club
![]() http://www.camaro5.com/forums/group.php?groupid=128 Northern Massachusetts & Southern New Hampshire Camaro Club http://www.camaro5.com/forums/group.php?groupid=127 The mother of all supercharger questions thread ![]() http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=77958 My 2010 Camaro Review ![]() http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?p=2025442#post2025442 2010 Transformer Edition Camaro L99 Auto ![]() ![]() ![]() Last edited by 2010 Bumblebee; 08-18-2010 at 01:37 PM. |
|||
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
|
Philippians 4:13
Drives: SLP Supercharged LS3 Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: The Motor City - Michigan
Posts: 1,991
|
Keep the question coming guys.. this is getting interesting.
![]() Now all we need is a solid answere... Last edited by newagemuscle; 08-18-2010 at 01:56 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Pro Charger or TVS 2300 Maggie! | taz | Forced Induction - V8 | 63 | 02-14-2010 04:19 AM |
| G-FORCE TVS 2300 2010 Camaro w a little suprise! | Mike TexaSS | Forced Induction - V8 | 23 | 02-08-2010 10:37 PM |
| Bumblebeecamaro gets supercharged by a Maggie TVS 2300 (plenty of pics inside) | bumblebeecamaro | Forced Induction - V8 | 10 | 01-14-2010 11:11 PM |
| I want to get a TVS 2300 but I need some (engine) comforting... | bumblebeecamaro | Forced Induction - V8 | 25 | 01-04-2010 07:25 PM |
| MP 2300 vs TVS 2300 | Carlos Garza | Forced Induction - V8 | 25 | 12-17-2009 12:13 PM |