![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Forced Induction - V8 V8 Supercharger, turbo, nitrous discussions |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 45
|
Help
I am procharging my 2011 2SS/RS and will probably run 12lbs of boost. I plan on putting AR long tube headers, comp cam, 1:85 rocker arms, forged pistons, 160deg thermostat, ZR1 clutch, suspension mods, rims and tires. My question is will a larger intake manifold be worth it and is there anything else I can add for more power?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield, Mo
Posts: 834
|
I'm biased from prior experience with the company. I would say go turbo. I hate Procharger.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 45
|
whats wrong with procharger? I was thinking kennebell and go with the traditional twin screw
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: 2011 2SS Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Springfield, Mo
Posts: 834
|
Its a long story. I'm from the vette community before here. A few thousand of us found the design and quality poor and the service worse. We basically redesigned the kits on our own.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Florida
Posts: 45
|
is a kennebell supercharger any better?
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Tags |
| intake, supercharger |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|