Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
JDP Motorsports
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...

Chevy Camaro vs... Comparison of Chevy Camaro versus its competition. *NO STREET RACING STORIES*

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 07-18-2011, 12:34 PM   #1
gjarzabek009

 
gjarzabek009's Avatar
 
Drives: 1LT
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 958
v6 camaro vs mazda rx8

I raced a newer mazda rx8 on a closed course the other day and I believe it had full bolt-ons/drag tires and even possibly a tune. He got the jump on me due to wheelspin but I quickly caught up and kept on pulling on him. I was surprised how quick it was for a car with so little torque... What makes these cars decently quick with 170 tourqe??
__________________
-21" GM wheels -3.73 gears -Injen PowerFlow CAI
-OBX LT headers -Doug Thorley Catback exhaust
-Magnaflow High Flow cats -Trifecta Tune
-VMAX Ported TB
-Maces 25mm Insulator
-Ported Intake manifolds (soon)
gjarzabek009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 12:45 PM   #2
UT-Engineer
Just Cruisin'
 
UT-Engineer's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Synergy Camaro
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 1,225
probably the weight difference.... 700lbs+ difference is quite a bit
__________________
2010 Synergy Green Camaro
25% Tint - CGM Painted GM GFX - 20" Niche M102 Wheels

UT-Engineer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 12:51 PM   #3
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: `12 LFX/`11 EB F-150/`13 Sonic RS
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 3,972
Yeah, I'd say weight, the DRs and the gear ratio (if an auto). Be glad is wasn't one of the older RX7s, those were pretty quick (for their time).
__________________
EFR Twin Turbo LFX-GPI Tune-ZL1 fuel pump-10:1 CR forged pistons-3.45 gear-Meth Injection-BMR Trailing Arms, Bushings & Sway Bars-Drag Radials-CircleD 4000 Stall-GPI Fuel Enrichment System
586 RWHP & 606 RWTQ @20 psi on 93 Octane (unlocked converter)
1/8 mile -- 7.158 @ 102.10 (20psi)
Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 01:08 PM   #4
gjarzabek009

 
gjarzabek009's Avatar
 
Drives: 1LT
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 958
I had a bad wheelspin and fishtail at launch but I think I would have got him right away with a decent launch.
__________________
-21" GM wheels -3.73 gears -Injen PowerFlow CAI
-OBX LT headers -Doug Thorley Catback exhaust
-Magnaflow High Flow cats -Trifecta Tune
-VMAX Ported TB
-Maces 25mm Insulator
-Ported Intake manifolds (soon)
gjarzabek009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 01:09 PM   #5
hypurone
I'm not totally useless..
 
hypurone's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SIM 2SS/RS A6 SC LPO Rallies
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cali - NorthBay
Posts: 2,010
Send a message via AIM to hypurone Send a message via MSN to hypurone Send a message via Yahoo to hypurone
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Yeah, I'd say weight, the DRs and the gear ratio (if an auto). Be glad is wasn't one of the older RX7s, those were pretty quick (for their time).
The 3rd gens which were twin turbo (255hp stock) and weighed 2800-2900lbs depending on model, were awesome. Add a "piggyback computer" and presto, 360hp without any other mods! Ask me how I know....
__________________
I can be used as a bad example! - Born on 10/05/09 MyCamaroBuildInfo
hypurone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 01:34 PM   #6
sasquash1984
Boom goes the dynamite
 
sasquash1984's Avatar
 
Drives: The yeti
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Saginaw/ Ft Worth TX
Posts: 2,807
My wife had a 04 rx8 Manuel then just traded in for a 09 Manuel there must faster than the autos , they pull 170 hp where the Manuel gets 232 hp there 3200-3300 lbs, new car driver claims the 09 r3 0-60 is 6.3 seconds where her 04 was 5.9 0-60
__________________
sasquash1984 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 02:01 PM   #7
lil_chef
Banned
 
Drives: 2010 Mustang GT
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Jacksonville
Posts: 1,823
Probably because torque only helps off the line. after the race is actually started and that half a second where torque matters has passed HP is what matters. also torque in this case hurt you considering you were spinning off the line. if you had hooked right up like they did it would have been a demolition on your part.
lil_chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 05:08 PM   #8
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: `12 LFX/`11 EB F-150/`13 Sonic RS
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 3,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by hypurone View Post
The 3rd gens which were twin turbo (255hp stock) and weighed 2800-2900lbs depending on model, were awesome. Add a "piggyback computer" and presto, 360hp without any other mods! Ask me how I know....
Yeah, a friend of mine showed me a write up of one with the twin setup that had 500 HP. Tell me that thing wouldn't just fly!
__________________
EFR Twin Turbo LFX-GPI Tune-ZL1 fuel pump-10:1 CR forged pistons-3.45 gear-Meth Injection-BMR Trailing Arms, Bushings & Sway Bars-Drag Radials-CircleD 4000 Stall-GPI Fuel Enrichment System
586 RWHP & 606 RWTQ @20 psi on 93 Octane (unlocked converter)
1/8 mile -- 7.158 @ 102.10 (20psi)
Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 07:04 PM   #9
hypurone
I'm not totally useless..
 
hypurone's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SIM 2SS/RS A6 SC LPO Rallies
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cali - NorthBay
Posts: 2,010
Send a message via AIM to hypurone Send a message via MSN to hypurone Send a message via Yahoo to hypurone
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Yeah, a friend of mine showed me a write up of one with the twin setup that had 500 HP. Tell me that thing wouldn't just fly!
It really gets good when someone with too much time and money decides to drop a 20B in one! OMFG! You can have that 500HP on only 5psi of boost! Shit gets really exciting when the boost starts climbing...
__________________
I can be used as a bad example! - Born on 10/05/09 MyCamaroBuildInfo
hypurone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 07:05 PM   #10
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 3,010
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Yeah, a friend of mine showed me a write up of one with the twin setup that had 500 HP. Tell me that thing wouldn't just fly!
The worst and best thing about the rotaries is rebuilding and replacing apex seals all the time. It's the worst because you'll end up doing it every 45k miles, but it's the best because it will be pretty much the same rebuild interval at 600hp as it will at 250hp
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-18-2011, 07:16 PM   #11
hypurone
I'm not totally useless..
 
hypurone's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SIM 2SS/RS A6 SC LPO Rallies
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Cali - NorthBay
Posts: 2,010
Send a message via AIM to hypurone Send a message via MSN to hypurone Send a message via Yahoo to hypurone
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro View Post
The worst and best thing about the rotaries is rebuilding and replacing apex seals all the time. It's the worst because you'll end up doing it every 45k miles, but it's the best because it will be pretty much the same rebuild interval at 600hp as it will at 250hp


Not even close! You just need to use the 3mm 1-piece ceramics from Ianetti. These were what Mazda ran in the Lemans winning 787B! You would have to have some seriously bad tuning to break these things...

I put 'em in my 1st gen when I street-bridge ported it. Beat on 'em for 83000 until I sold the car with perfect compression.
__________________
I can be used as a bad example! - Born on 10/05/09 MyCamaroBuildInfo
hypurone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 02:05 PM   #12
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 6,004
First off -if you're into drag, you need to get rid of those 21" wheels.
Maybe you're not running them when you race?

You're giving up at least .2 (2 car lengths in a 1/4 mile) running those wheels.

You should get some light weight 18" wheels. You would be amazed by how much faster your car would be. (probably .4 faster (4+ car lengths) in a 1/4 mile with light weight 18" wheels).
__________________
SGOS252382 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 04:48 PM   #13
bmorecam
Account Suspended
 
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!!
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,705
rx-8's are all looks and no go. They kinda remind me of our V6 tho when it come to tuning. Very limited or at least for the newer models. The manual rev up to 10k tho and I love that sound of the rotary, its something you dont really hear everyday.
bmorecam is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 07:32 PM   #14
gjarzabek009

 
gjarzabek009's Avatar
 
Drives: 1LT
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 958
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGOS252382 View Post
First off -if you're into drag, you need to get rid of those 21" wheels.
Maybe you're not running them when you race?

You're giving up at least .2 (2 car lengths in a 1/4 mile) running those wheels.

You should get some light weight 18" wheels. You would be amazed by how much faster your car would be. (probably .4 faster (4+ car lengths) in a 1/4 mile with light weight 18" wheels).
I'm not that into drag racing that I would give up my 21s for it hehe. I would love my car to be faster though Turbo/sc (if they make one) is an option next year for me.
__________________
-21" GM wheels -3.73 gears -Injen PowerFlow CAI
-OBX LT headers -Doug Thorley Catback exhaust
-Magnaflow High Flow cats -Trifecta Tune
-VMAX Ported TB
-Maces 25mm Insulator
-Ported Intake manifolds (soon)
gjarzabek009 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-19-2011, 09:53 PM   #15
DarkneSS


 
DarkneSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Yonkers, New York
Posts: 3,237
A stock V6 should take a stock one. There like high 14 second cars.
__________________


DarkneSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 12:11 AM   #16
08-G35s/6MT

 
08-G35s/6MT's Avatar
 
Drives: racecars
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by DarkneSS View Post
A stock V6 should take a stock one. There like high 14 second cars.
http://www.dragtimes.com/Mazda--RX-8-Drag-Racing.html
08-G35s/6MT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 06:39 AM   #17
snizzle
Recalled user
 
snizzle's Avatar
 
Drives: '12 2SS MT 45th AE
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Richmond, VA
Posts: 1,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by bmorecam View Post
rx-8's are all looks and no go. They kinda remind me of our V6 tho when it come to tuning. Very limited or at least for the newer models. The manual rev up to 10k tho and I love that sound of the rotary, its something you dont really hear everyday.
Maybe if you are obsessed with straightline speed and stoplight drags. She'll move around a track if you keep the engine in its' sweet spot.

Limited tuning as Mazda basically tapped out the engine from the start. Guys were putting in aftermarket CAI/catback and LOSING power.

9K redline MT, 7500 AT btw.
snizzle is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-20-2011, 07:12 AM   #18
BackinBlackSS/RS
Go Blue!!!!!
 
BackinBlackSS/RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Cruze LT
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Indiana
Posts: 23,374
Quote:
Originally Posted by lil_chef View Post
Probably because torque only helps off the line. after the race is actually started and that half a second where torque matters has passed HP is what matters.
Torque gets you going, HP keeps you going.
BackinBlackSS/RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 01:40 AM   #19
08-G35s/6MT

 
08-G35s/6MT's Avatar
 
Drives: racecars
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,576


MW got faster times for the RX-7 than the Supra and Mitsubishi 3000GT VR-4. Though the Nissan 300ZX was faster than all of them.
08-G35s/6MT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 01:43 AM   #20
08-G35s/6MT

 
08-G35s/6MT's Avatar
 
Drives: racecars
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: BMN
Posts: 1,576
Quote:
Originally Posted by BackinBlackSS/RS View Post
Torque gets you going, HP keeps you going.
Haha my friend in a 04 new edge Mustang 5-speed always this up if I even mention anything about my car being faster.
08-G35s/6MT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 01:43 AM   #21
Cyber Gray
Wind Rider
 
Cyber Gray's Avatar
 
Drives: CGM A6 1LT 2010; JK Wrangler 2011
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Muscat
Posts: 1,557
wheel hops and spin sucks!

Im considering full rear suspension upgrade with Pfadt toe rods, trailing arms, and endlinks.

I hope that this will put it on track
__________________
Cyber Gray is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-21-2011, 12:16 PM   #22
Sidd218
GM Loyal
 
Sidd218's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Impala SS
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Virginia
Posts: 260
Quote:
Originally Posted by UT-Engineer View Post
probably the weight difference.... 700lbs+ difference is quite a bit
__________________
2011 2LT RS

Sidd218 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 07-30-2011, 08:27 PM   #23
AdamChoudhry
 
AdamChoudhry's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 52
I personally own both a 2004 Rx8 and 2010 Camaro v6 and the V6 is definitely faster in a straight line but the mazda's handling is ridiculous
AdamChoudhry is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 12:07 AM   #24
mikeSS


 
mikeSS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2013 E92 M3
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,314
the rx8 was made to handle, i really miss mine. i had a 2009 rx8 r3, but traded it up for a camaro. i wanted something with more power, but i didn't realize how rare and how well the handling was very day in that thing. but in the end of the day i power is what i wanted and power is what i got.
mikeSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 08-01-2011, 09:32 PM   #25
Victoryred69
 
Victoryred69's Avatar
 
Drives: RS Victory Red/BS V6
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: toronto
Posts: 392
Funny i read this, i went to the track today and my cousin has a 04 Mazda RX8 GT manual. The things pretty quick for a little go kart, if it had the mazdaspeed 3 motor in it with the turbo it would fly! He managed a 15.8 today at 89mph ... its stock besides the K&N intake. Nice sounding car at 9500RPM though , just lacking in torque.

I raced him and got him off the dig and then just kept pulling pretty much.
__________________

2010 Camaro 2LT RS M6 VR/BS
Flowmaster AMT Axle Back
Vararam Ram Air Intake
P13 Plazma Bulbs
DT Shorty Headers
Heritage Grill
Blacked-Out Taillights and Side Markers




Victoryred69 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Modern Camaro Performance - Lowest Prices Anywhere! PartsTaxi.com Sponsor Announcements / Giveaways / Contests 0 11-03-2010 10:50 AM
Think about this and the Z28 5th gen 13F20 Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics 41 09-04-2010 12:59 AM
Over 230 Satisfied 2010 Camaro Customers! Paddock Chevrolet has 40 in stock NOW camarojoe Dealer Camaros for Sale 2 05-24-2010 05:58 PM
Drag Racing Suspension Kits Info@PeddersUSA.com Suspension / Chassis / Brakes 25 02-21-2010 08:48 PM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 07:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:39 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.