![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics Camaro ZL1 specific topics |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro - IOM - 625 RWHP Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 394
|
Mod the LSA or Sell It And Replace with Supercharged LS7 ???
Ladies and Gents,
Here is where I am struggling and I will need to make a decision fairly soon. I am currently considering two choices and I would like your opinions please along with any supporting information to back your stance: Turn the LSA into a 417 Stroker with GT-9 or GT-11 cam, forged pistons, 2300 maggie, 10/14 rib pulley upgrade cranking about 750 hp. OR Sell the stock 580 HP LSA engine for about $12K and replace with an LS7 block, LS9 heads, forged pistons, GT-9 cam, 10/14 rib pulley upgrade, headers, cranking about 775 HP. So what do you guys say??? |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP 2010 Traverse LTZ Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roanoke,TX
Posts: 652
|
LS7 is a great motor, but if you are going to go with a 427, I have heard the RHS block has thicker cylinder walls and holds up to boost better. There is a reason why GM went with the 6.2 in the ZR1!
One more point, myself, I like the whipple, great whine and from what I have read and seen, the 2.9L Whipple seems to make = or more HP at lower boost and lower IAT, for about the same cost. |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
LS7 block doesn't like boost...very thin cylinder walls to manage that 427ci volume...
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() Drives: 1991 Z28; 2008 SRT 10 Viper Coupe Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Indianapolis
Posts: 901
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
I used to be Dragoneye...
|
Wouldn't the first option be a little less expensive, too?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Petro-sexual
Drives: Ultra-Grin Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 12,949
|
LS7 block is relatively expensive. Stroke LSA and call it a day, after your cam ans SC. How much power anyways? Maybe you could get by with rods and pistons on LSA. Same heads as LS9...
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP 2010 Traverse LTZ Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roanoke,TX
Posts: 652
|
My understanding also is the LSA block has additional reinforcement in the block over the LS3/LS9 block, though I do not know that for fact, I seem to remember reading it in the description of the LSA motor. If you are going for increased boost, forge the LSA, get a larger twin screw blower or TT and have at it!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
A GM nut-swinger!
Drives: A Car Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 261
|
All Al 6.2's should be the same. After the LS9 came out the LS3 got updated to the new casting.
__________________
2004 GTO Quicksilver
2009 G8 Liquid Red 2005 CTS-V Black Raven |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
|
A GM nut-swinger!
Drives: A Car Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 261
|
Quote:
Pulley down the stock s/c Forge pistons, rods Cam Tune Headers See where that will put ya. Stock s/c not good enough go with the LS9 s/c. They do it for the CTS-V. So far what has been offered to the LSA/LS9 is s/c aftermarket inlets and larger heat exchangers net great results.
__________________
2004 GTO Quicksilver
2009 G8 Liquid Red 2005 CTS-V Black Raven |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Camaro➎ moderator
|
You can get that much horsepower out of the LSA without spending as much money.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
OKCamaros
Drives: '13 WRX STi Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Muskogee, OK
Posts: 4,621
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
![]() Drives: 2002 Lifted Trailblazer Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Knoxville, TN
Posts: 51
|
Lingenfelter is where im going 700+hp at the crank Lingenfelter is the choice for me
Last edited by payne.jeremy82; 09-30-2011 at 01:15 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#13 | |
|
Moderator.ca
|
There are better options than the LS7 if you want to swap in a supercharged engine.
Quote:
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Quote: In 2014 the camaro will have ... a twin turbo v6 ... around 350 to 360HP No. Let me repeat that. No. FbodFather __________________ Camaro5 Fest III Information Camaro5 Fest III pre-registration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Quote:
![]()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
Account Suspended
|
Stroking a boosted motor is an exercise in futility. You're limited by what the boost device pushes into the motor, not by the motor itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP 2010 Traverse LTZ Join Date: May 2009
Location: Roanoke,TX
Posts: 652
|
2.9L doesn't limit it! Just saying
And for that matter, I think you would be good with the 2.3 up to 750-800, at least ADM, SLP, Lingenfelter, Hennessey (and other tuners I missed) seem to think so.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro - IOM - 625 RWHP Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 394
|
All great comments gentlemen, and taken under advisement. In my gut I felt like keeping the LSA would probably be the best route to take as I understand that it is basically a detuned LS9 which upgrading the supercharger and forging the bottom end can easily fix. As one of you pointed out, modding the LSA would be cheaper in the long run VS relpacing with the LS7, but you must admit there is something a bit sexy with saying you have a 427 sitting under the hood
![]() I really dont know much about all of this engine detail stuff, that is why I am asking. The little bit I have picked up just by asking questions is just enough to be dangerous, but I have never owned a muscle car and I would rather shell out the bucks to get it right the first time instead of continually going back to add this or that later on. One of you stated that stroking doesnt necessarily add HP and that could be true. But since I am having the bottom end forged I may as well, right? I understand it does improve torque, but someone (possibly Ted Jannety) stated that you gain about 1 hp for each cui added so going from 376 to 416/417 would add about 40 hp and a bunch of torque so I am told. |
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Faith Keeper
Drives: 2012 Silverado LTZ, 2010 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada
Posts: 2,774
|
Why not Sell the LSA and buy an LS9?
Pretty good starter motor. You could mod after if you still felt the need. Although if you have never owned a muscle car, you should try renting an SS and see what you think. That might be more than enough car for you. |
|
|
|
|
|
#19 | ||||
|
Petro-sexual
Drives: Ultra-Grin Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 12,949
|
Quote:
Quote:
I think the 2300 runs out of breathe after 850. Lingenfelter's LS9-car is running +1200 RWHP, but it also has a 500-shot, lol. Either entry-level twin screw (2.8/2.9) for these cars will easily support near 1000-horse.Quote:
Quote:
The best suggestion I can offer (because I'm certainly no expert on anything) is to figure out where you want to be. If you're only looking for 700 horsepower, you don't need to do a fraction of what you were thinking. If you want 800 horsepower, you'll definately want to get into that shortblock and get at the valvetrain and heads, and probably upgrade the SC and intercooling system. If you're looking for more, you're certainly looking at probably going down the road of a completely re-worked long block and SC. There are many Sponsors here that can help you with a plan once you know where you want to go. I'd urge you to establish the goal, and seek out a Sponsor to help you get there Good luck and please keep us posted ![]() ![]()
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
|
||||
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 ZL1 IOM Vin #169 Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 1,837
|
Mod LSA if I was to choose. They have just placed so much research into this project, plus the caddie has been using the LSA for awhile now. So
I would stay with the LSA and do whatever you can afford up to the capabilites that the LZ1 can handle.
__________________
Last edited by Z4me; 09-30-2011 at 10:31 AM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Petro-sexual
Drives: Ultra-Grin Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 12,949
|
I can't post the companies link because they're not a Sponsor, but I'll definately be looking into similar mods' for mine. They're all pretty simple and push that "little" 1900 to it's limit. I think they can pulley to 19 psi with their H/C package... They don't really have anything too much more special than our Sponsors, but I see they just make LSA one of their top focuses.
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
A GM nut-swinger!
Drives: A Car Join Date: May 2009
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 261
|
To be on the safe side while you have the bottom end apart go with good ARP bolts. I would also do ARP head bolts with MLS gaskets. Boosted motors put more stress on parts than a equal powed NA motor. Do it right the first time and save yourself the trouble later down the road. You notice the LS9 have larger head bolts with only 80hp more than the LSA.
__________________
2004 GTO Quicksilver
2009 G8 Liquid Red 2005 CTS-V Black Raven |
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
Camaro➎ moderator
|
That's still more expensive than just modding the LSA to have the same power.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
|
Moderator.ca
|
I couldn't find the exact page either, at first I had the same thought you did ... that they have since fixed the page. But I went looking through their site (to try and find the page he tried to link to) and every engine package they have for the 6.2L V8s (LS3, L99, LSA, LS9) describes them as '378 CID'. Whoopsie.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________ Quote: In 2014 the camaro will have ... a twin turbo v6 ... around 350 to 360HP No. Let me repeat that. No. FbodFather __________________ Camaro5 Fest III Information Camaro5 Fest III pre-registration |
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Drives: Camaro 2010 SS LS7 427ci Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Miami
Posts: 60
|
Biggfoot
Stick with the LSA and do your mods. I transplanted an LS7, race cam, 305cc intake chamber Mast heads, FAST intake, ZR1 injectors and all forged internals, mahle pistons 11.4:1 compression. The motor makes almost 600 lbs of torque @ 630 hp. The trouble with all that power is you start breaking, drive train parts, suspension parts and the like. My car runs great however foot to the floor shifting through four gears, lots of stuff breaks. GM did good job of upgrading the drive line in the ZL 1 however that might require more upgrades still. The LS 7 block and forged internals are bulletproof and the cylinder walls are more than strong enough for a street car. Save some money in the budget to replace broken drivetrain components. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|