![]() |
|
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Camaro V6 LFX Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons For all LFX related parts |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2010 1LT RS A6, C&C, Victory Red Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Oxnard, CA
Posts: 602
|
2012 LFX V6 Performance Numbers?
Does anyone have 0-60 and 1/4 mile times for the 2012 LFX-powered V6 yet?
I've been looking around and I haven't been able to find anything concrete.
__________________
Performance Mods: Injen Powerflow CAI, Doug Thorley Cat-Back Exhaust, Doug Thorley Shorty Headers, Trifecta Tune, TSW Nurburgring Wheels 20x9, 3.45 Ratio LSD Swap, VMax Black Ice-Olator
Appearance Mods: RiderGraphix LS7 Front Fascia Blackout Vinyl, Gill Insert Vinyl, Rear Deck Lid Vinyl (Gloss Black), Gary's Customs Painted Bowties Coming Soon: BMR Trailing Arms |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() Drives: 12 45th ed, 02 mustang roush Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: arkansas
Posts: 79
|
Yeah, good luck on that. I have been trying to find out some actuals myself and nadda.
__________________
------------------------------------
2012 45th ed. 08/31/2011 (1100) ![]() 08/31/2011 (1102) 09/05/2011 (2000) 09/06/2011 (2500) 09/07/2011 (3000) (TPW 9/26) 09/16/2011 (3300) 09/21/2011 (3400) |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Account Suspended
|
The car has been out for 2 months now and still no performance reviews. Either nothing a all has changed except for numbers on paper or its Top Secret info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Really Slow Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Charleston, SC
Posts: 43,944
|
Lots of people don't go to the track until fall. It's just now cooling down, so just be patient.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
<< CRAZY BEE >>
Drives: 400HP 2LT/RS Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Alberta
Posts: 917
|
From the changes made, the 0-60 times should be the same but the quarter mile should be slightly quicker due to the increased hp figures and slightly reduced weight. Like Poorman said, wait a bit more to see factual information.
Shaun
__________________
CRAZY BEE - IOM 2LT/RS (more) Cosmetic Mods - 23 | Performance Mods - 13 ROTO-FAB CAI - DT HEADERS - MRT1 EXHAUST - RES DEL - R-CATS DEL - MAGNAFLOW RES X-PIPE - PHASE CAM FULL ADM KIT - PORTED IM - PORTED TB - PORTED CH - BLACK 3/8 ISOLATOR - TRIFECTA TUNED |
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro 1LT/RS M6 Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Yonkers, New York
Posts: 3,065
|
They might be a tenth faster, no more than that though
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: Camaro Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 143
|
well i have 1 i just put on new exhaust and i order the CAI intake they just realized so its not stock anymore its only 11 more HP stock and a few pounds lighter. speaking of HP what is the real number we should worry about the advertised number from GM or the rwhp on a dyno. i would think after i am done i started at 323 i will be around 350 with the 2 upgrades. CAI says its adds 16ish to RWHP how much does mean from where GM counts it?
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '10 ABM LT/RS, 01 Ford Ranger Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 6,912
|
Quote:
__________________
Shes ALL MINE! - 8/24/2009 2G1FB1EV2A9133373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: Camaro V6 1LT Manual Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Miami FL
Posts: 2,186
|
Quote:
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() Drives: Camaro Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: PA
Posts: 143
|
yeah i am talking flywheel whats the normal loss to the tires 30%? i was saying so if CIA says the intake gets yout 16rwhp that is around 20ish more HP where GM counts it so your looking around 345 on gms numbers...just checking to see if i am right
|
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 LS Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 1,693
|
Are those gains based on the results on the LLT motor? If so can you transfer them over? I would think the gain results would be different on a different engine, maybe not too much IDK.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
You Can Call Me Jay
Drives: 2010 1LT RJT Manual w/CAI & Solo Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Louisville, KY area
Posts: 1,247
|
IMHO it's a drivers race between a stock LLT & LFX.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Don't Sleep on My V6
Drives: 2011 SIM 1LT M6 TT/ 2001 Malibu GTP Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Norcross, GA
Posts: 3,090
|
I guess this is when Team LLT and (I'm guessing)Team LFX will start to part ways! So let the bashing begin
|
|
|
|
|
|
#14 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2012 LFX/2011 EcoBoost F-150 Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 3,819
|
Quote:
![]() Just kidding of course. I can't wait to see what Vince can do with the LFX and its new ECU.
__________________
EFR Twin Turbo LFX-GPI Tune-ZL1 fuel pump-10:1 CR forged pistons-3.45 gear-Meth Injection-BMR Trailing Arms, Bushings & Sway Bars-Drag Radials-CircleD 4000 Stall-GPI Fuel Enrichment System
586 RWHP & 606 RWTQ @20 psi on 93 Octane (unlocked converter) 1/8 mile -- 7.158 @ 102.10 (20psi) Build Thread |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 | |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,705
|
Quote:
you didn't have to go there with the plastic gretch lol.![]() No header for the LFX=FAIL Just kidding but you LFX guys have some things ahead of us like the option for EFI live as we speak and 11 more hp from factory. More factory HP is always good. Give it some time and there will be tons and tons of parts for you LFX peoples. and almost forgot, you guys can go from gas to e85 as you wish and your ecm will adjust for it. Can't get better than that. Factory e85 tune is very conservative. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: White M6 1LT RS Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Canton, MI
Posts: 1,666
|
So did the 2012 LFX get a new manual transmission? Or is it still that problematic AY6?
__________________
Pfadt Sway Bars - FE3 Suspension - Barton Shifter - IdealG's Clutch Master Cylinder - Trifecta - Vmax TB - Vararam Intake - MACE 25mm Insulator - Plenum Insulator - Ported/Gasket Matched Intake Manifold - Rx Catchcan - AAC DRL's - 4 Pack Aux Gauges - Steering Controls - AAC Afterburners - DIY Led Sidemarkers - ZL1 Front End
Next mod: Done! |
|
|
|
|
|
#17 | |
|
having FUN now
|
Quote:
General rule of thumb is 20% loss for the automatic. 15% for the manual.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
Account Suspended
|
Nothing to report...if there were GM would be tooting there own horn. They tooted when the engine was taken apart outside of the car but when its in the engine bay not a peep.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() Drives: Check Signature :P Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Portland, OR
Posts: 87
|
Where did you hear this? Manual doesn't say it can run E85. All vehicles I have seen that can run E85 say so on the cap.
__________________
Vince
2012 CRT 2LT 93 Z28 V8/A4 Black/Black 91 RS Vert V8/A4 Black with Pink Flames 89 Iroc-Z V8/A4 Copper/Grey 84 Z28 V8/A4 White/Blue 77 LT V8/M4 Aqua/White 71 V8/M6 Black/Black (someday if I ever get home to work on it) |
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
![]() Drives: '71 Buick GSX- '12 2LT/RS-Silverado Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: KY-USA
Posts: 56
|
I went out this morning and used my g meter for a few 0-60 runs and I got it down to a best of 5.65 sec. The rest were 5.7ish. The car has 900 miles and it was on the 60s with decent humidity this morning. That was on a concrete surface with traction control off in manual mode letting the car shift itself. Don't bother doing a run on anything other than concrete because the numbers will be all over the place.....toooo much wheelspin even with a V6..lol. I had used the g meter to measure other cars and it seems to be dead on as long as you use the same starting technique, similar conditions, ect. Alot of classic small block and several big block owners would kill for mid-5 to low-6 0 to 60 sec runs. Not bad for a loaded 220 cube engine that gets 30 mpg. My 455 GSX with 235 more cubes doesn't want to talk about little bro' stealing his thunder. Now in the 1/4 mile...............I don't think I want to talk about it either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
|
Capital District Camaros
Drives: Camaros (All Years) Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Albany,N.Y. Area
Posts: 228
|
i'VE BEEN 14.60 IN WARM WEATHER SO FAR, 85 HIGH HUMIDITY. 2.15 60'
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 | |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '10 ABM LT/RS, 01 Ford Ranger Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 6,912
|
Quote:
Every run I've ever done with TC off ended early because the wheelspin basically killed the run. I've gotten a 5.8 with Torque for my Android (I feel like the car should be good for better than that) but I always loose at least a few tenths because the wheels spin...TC kicks in to correct it and then she takes off. With TC off my best runs were in the mid 6s. How do you hook up with TC off? Do you heat up your tires first with a little burn off? lol
__________________
Shes ALL MINE! - 8/24/2009 2G1FB1EV2A9133373
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
![]() Drives: '71 Buick GSX- '12 2LT/RS-Silverado Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: KY-USA
Posts: 56
|
No burnout....just floored it off idle. Every time I tried to flash the convertor the run would be about a half sec. slower. As I said find a concrete bridge. Aphault will result in excessive spinning and slow times. Drag strips are concrete for the first 1000 ft or so for a reason.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() Drives: 2013 Mustang 5.0 Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: CA
Posts: 103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() Drives: '71 Buick GSX- '12 2LT/RS-Silverado Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: KY-USA
Posts: 56
|
None so far. I have been using 93 super but I don't see that being a factor. The only mod I may do later is find some SS mufflers in the classified section. The car needs some more sound. The other runs were in the 5.71-5.78 range so I would go with that as the more accurate number for my car that day in those conditions. Other A6 cars should be maybe a tenth faster or slower close in similar conditions. Now the 1st run I ever did was a 6.1 but I tried to flash the converter but the wheelspin slowed me down and it also bogged a little when it hooked up. The rest of the runs were flooring it just off idle. Like I said before on concrete the wheelspin is not a factor but starting on the road surface the car is atleast a half second slower. Now compared to my Moms '10 A6 SS my car will just go without much drama while hers will spin several feet using the same starting technique on the same concrete bridge. I got a best of 5.10 out of hers with some practice. That is about right since the L99 is about 70 hp stronger with everything else being similar (both weigh about the same, both are A6 equipped, both have same wheel/tire combination.
Also the nearest airport is about 30 mi away and it is listed at 919 ft above sea level and where I live is about 150-200 feel lower. Last edited by carguyusa; 06-03-2012 at 03:31 PM. |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| Shno's House of Z | Number 3 | Camaro Z/28 Forum - Z/28 Specific Topics | 12951 | Yesterday 08:46 PM |
| V8 Camaro Performance Upgrades List | Milk 1027 | Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons | 79 | 03-04-2013 09:25 AM |
| CEL - P1682 | PSU SS | Tuning / Diagnostics -- engine and transmission | 4 | 09-29-2011 07:27 PM |
| 4th Annual GM Performance Parts LSX Shootout!! | nmcajeff | Off-topic Discussions | 0 | 07-28-2010 08:28 AM |