Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
SDPC
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 10-08-2011, 04:40 AM   #1
shaggy1
The thin blue line
 
shaggy1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012, 2SS/RS,LS3,IOM/Beige
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North East, TX
Posts: 297
What's the quickest / fastest stock Camaro ever,...

I'm just curious since there are several gear heads on here. What is the fastest and quickest 100% stock Camaro'(S) ever. Just looking at the HP numbers I would think the current Gen 5 LS3 would be pretty high up on the list, but I do know its pretty heavy,.... therefore i'm not sure where it would wind up on the list.
shaggy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2011, 06:04 AM   #2
LEADfoot927
 
LEADfoot927's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 GT500 SVTPP
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Fort Lewis, WA
Posts: 440
I believe a 12.58 1/4 mile. 8:22 on the Nurnbergring. I dont consider the camaro to be heavy. Its only 150-200 lbs from it closest competitors, which is eqivelant to a passanger or a tank of gas. I drove my ex-girlfriends Mercedes S55 AMG. that was a heavy car, and I blew that away with an L99. I believe the Camaro's weakness is its tall gearing, which makes it much harder to get the car moving.
__________________
Past rides:
2002 BMW M3
2010 Camaro V6
2010 Camaro SS L99
2011 Camaro SS Ls3
2011 Dodge Charger R/T
2012 Dodge Charger SRT8 Super Bee/ Reso Delete
Current ride:
2012 GT500/ VMP 2.5 pulley+tune, Airaid intake, Afco Dual pass heat exchanger, Roush Extreme Exhaust: 537 rwhp
LEADfoot927 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2011, 08:30 AM   #3
shaggy1
The thin blue line
 
shaggy1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012, 2SS/RS,LS3,IOM/Beige
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North East, TX
Posts: 297
I was wandering of all the Camaros over the years,... What was the fastest or quickest, or if indeed it is the new 5th Gen Camaros or would an earlier year model be faster.
shaggy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2011, 08:55 AM   #4
shaggy1
The thin blue line
 
shaggy1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012, 2SS/RS,LS3,IOM/Beige
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: North East, TX
Posts: 297
Top 10 chart

Here is a list that I came up with after doing a little internet research.

#1 - 1969 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
427 V8, 430hp, 12.76 1/4 mile @ 107mph

#2 - 1999 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS
LS1 V8, 310hp, 12.89 1/4 mile @ 109.18mph

#3 - 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS
6.2 V8, 426hp, 13.0 1/4 mile @ 111.0mph

#4 - 1969 Chevrolet Camaro SS
L78 V8, 375hp, 13.0 1/4 mile @ 108.6 mph

#5 - 1997 SLP Camaro SS
LT4 V8, 330hp, 13.20 1/4 mile @ 108.8 mph

#6 - 1996 Chevrolet Camaro SS
LT1 V8 310hp, 13.46 1/4 mile @ 106.48 mph

#7 - 2000 Chevrolet Camaro SS
LS1 V8 325hp, 13.5 1/4 mile @ 107.3 mph

#8 - 1968 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
302 V8 290hp, 13.75 1/4 mile @ 107 mph

#9 - 2001 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS
LS1 V8 310hp, 13.8 1/4 mile @ 108.5 mph

#10 - 1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
LS1 V8 305hp, 13.9 1/4 mile @ 102.5 mph


I in now way offer any guarentee that all this data is 100% correct and I felt it would just be a neat top 10 chart. If any are wrong or out of order,.... this is just the best data that I could find on the web. I'm only saying that this should be pretty close, but by no means am I saying it's 100% accurate since everything can change on a given day and I honestly don't know the conditions that these times were obtained in.
shaggy1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-08-2011, 10:45 AM   #5
DarkneSS
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS 6MT
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Westchester, New York
Posts: 3,715
Haha interesting how far V6 have come, a manual 5th gen V6 wouldnt be far off that list.
DarkneSS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 02:59 AM   #6
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 23,375
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
To date, the fastest stock Camaro is the current SS followed closely by the original ZL1

Quote:
Originally Posted by shaggy1 View Post
Here is a list that I came up with after doing a little internet research.

#1 - 1969 Chevrolet Camaro ZL1
427 V8, 430hp, 12.76 1/4 mile @ 107mph

#2 - 1999 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS
LS1 V8, 310hp, 12.89 1/4 mile @ 109.18mph

#3 - 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS
6.2 V8, 426hp, 13.0 1/4 mile @ 111.0mph

#4 - 1969 Chevrolet Camaro SS
L78 V8, 375hp, 13.0 1/4 mile @ 108.6 mph

#5 - 1997 SLP Camaro SS
LT4 V8, 330hp, 13.20 1/4 mile @ 108.8 mph

#6 - 1996 Chevrolet Camaro SS
LT1 V8 310hp, 13.46 1/4 mile @ 106.48 mph

#7 - 2000 Chevrolet Camaro SS
LS1 V8 325hp, 13.5 1/4 mile @ 107.3 mph

#8 - 1968 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
302 V8 290hp, 13.75 1/4 mile @ 107 mph

#9 - 2001 Chevrolet Camaro Z28 SS
LS1 V8 310hp, 13.8 1/4 mile @ 108.5 mph

#10 - 1998 Chevrolet Camaro Z28
LS1 V8 305hp, 13.9 1/4 mile @ 102.5 mph


I in now way offer any guarentee that all this data is 100% correct and I felt it would just be a neat top 10 chart. If any are wrong or out of order,.... this is just the best data that I could find on the web. I'm only saying that this should be pretty close, but by no means am I saying it's 100% accurate since everything can change on a given day and I honestly don't know the conditions that these times were obtained in.
Its nice to see someone admit out front that their info could be wrong or incomplete. Overall, I'd agree with it although a few things did stand out when I looked at it

That 4th gen in the 12s seems highly suspect to me. Not sure if it was a hero run or not, but if it was I can find a 5th gen that beat it by 3 tenths. Anything that I've seen, the 1st gens were were much slower than you're posting -they had a hard time running the 1/4 in less than 14 seconds. Except for the original ZL1 that is, which I think had a stock time claimed to be in the low 13s or perhaps 13 flat. I forget which. I would guess that the '69 SS was "stock" not stock. Back in the day, if you didn't muck around inside the engine, you could still usually claim that you were stock. So you could arguably be using headers, retune the engine, tweak the suspension, put on some drag tires, and still be "stock". Today, we'd generally put a car like that in the bolt-ons or lightly modified category.


One final note ... the hp ratings from the 60's are 100% meaningless if you compare them to todays numbers. It was a different time back then. Automakers would inflate, then under rate their engines making it virtually impossible to know how much power they really made. That all changed when the SAE gross system was replaced with the SAE net rating system. For example, the fabled ZL1 was rumoured to pack over 500 hp, yet was officially rated at 430. That was in the 'anything goes' era of SAE gross. But in the early 70's, it is said to have been re-tested with the new testing procedures, and it came to 375 hp or so. Since then, SAE testing has undergone further revisions and probably became even more conservative (though I don't know this for a fact).
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 10:21 AM   #7
302-412
 
Drives: 2013 Ram Express
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Seguin Texas
Posts: 228
MM&FF got high 12's out of an LS1 SS in a comparo with a terminator. Those cars are pretty fast, they were impressed!
302-412 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 12:32 PM   #8
JHL88
 
JHL88's Avatar
 
Drives: 02 z06
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Virginia/south carolina
Posts: 416
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
To date, the fastest stock Camaro is the current SS followed closely by the original ZL1

Its nice to see someone admit out front that their info could be wrong or incomplete. Overall, I'd agree with it although a few things did stand out when I looked at it

That 4th gen in the 12s seems highly suspect to me. Not sure if it was a hero run or not, but if it was I can find a 5th gen that beat it by 3 tenths. Anything that I've seen, the 1st gens were were much slower than you're posting -they had a hard time running the 1/4 in less than 14 seconds. Except for the original ZL1 that is, which I think had a stock time claimed to be in the low 13s or perhaps 13 flat. I forget which. I would guess that the '69 SS was "stock" not stock. Back in the day, if you didn't muck around inside the engine, you could still usually claim that you were stock. So you could arguably be using headers, retune the engine, tweak the suspension, put on some drag tires, and still be "stock". Today, we'd generally put a car like that in the bolt-ons or lightly modified category.


One final note ... the hp ratings from the 60's are 100% meaningless if you compare them to todays numbers. It was a different time back then. Automakers would inflate, then under rate their engines making it virtually impossible to know how much power they really made. That all changed when the SAE gross system was replaced with the SAE net rating system. For example, the fabled ZL1 was rumoured to pack over 500 hp, yet was officially rated at 430. That was in the 'anything goes' era of SAE gross. But in the early 70's, it is said to have been re-tested with the new testing procedures, and it came to 375 hp or so. Since then, SAE testing has undergone further revisions and probably became even more conservative (though I don't know this for a fact).
more than likely that time is true. there have been several LS1 fbodies in the 12's stock.
__________________
1997 RS wrecked
1998 Z28 sold
10 SS sold
2002 torch redc5z06 - sold :(
'13 z71 4x4 - DD




www.fquick.com/JHL88
JHL88 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 01:43 PM   #9
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
To date, the fastest stock Camaro is the current SS followed closely by the original ZL1

Its nice to see someone admit out front that their info could be wrong or incomplete. Overall, I'd agree with it although a few things did stand out when I looked at it

That 4th gen in the 12s seems highly suspect to me. Not sure if it was a hero run or not, but if it was I can find a 5th gen that beat it by 3 tenths. Anything that I've seen, the 1st gens were were much slower than you're posting -they had a hard time running the 1/4 in less than 14 seconds. Except for the original ZL1 that is, which I think had a stock time claimed to be in the low 13s or perhaps 13 flat. I forget which. I would guess that the '69 SS was "stock" not stock. Back in the day, if you didn't muck around inside the engine, you could still usually claim that you were stock. So you could arguably be using headers, retune the engine, tweak the suspension, put on some drag tires, and still be "stock". Today, we'd generally put a car like that in the bolt-ons or lightly modified category.


One final note ... the hp ratings from the 60's are 100% meaningless if you compare them to todays numbers. It was a different time back then. Automakers would inflate, then under rate their engines making it virtually impossible to know how much power they really made. That all changed when the SAE gross system was replaced with the SAE net rating system. For example, the fabled ZL1 was rumoured to pack over 500 hp, yet was officially rated at 430. That was in the 'anything goes' era of SAE gross. But in the early 70's, it is said to have been re-tested with the new testing procedures, and it came to 375 hp or so. Since then, SAE testing has undergone further revisions and probably became even more conservative (though I don't know this for a fact).
The 12s quarter in the f-body was run by Evan Smith. It happened, but he's also one of the best, most consistent 1320' drivers around.
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 03:20 PM   #10
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 23,375
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
Alright, so it was a hero run. Thats fine, I can accept that. But if that is going to represent 4th gens, lets use the 12.58s pass that NHRA Stocker made for the 5th Gens, instead of the standard 13.0 magazine time.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 03:57 PM   #11
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,121
Quote:
Originally Posted by 8cd03gro View Post
The 12s quarter in the f-body was run by Evan Smith. It happened, but he's also one of the best, most consistent 1320' drivers around.
there were a good few stock 4th gens touch 12's back in the day.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Black GT View Post
Couple months ago we a few of us were at the track playing with one of my buddies 2010 Z06 automatic.Between 4 of us NO ONE was able to get out of the 12's.

I believe torque managnent was killing us that night, when launching the car would take off and fall flat on it's face.
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 05:22 PM   #12
8cd03gro


 
Drives: 2005 STi corn fed
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,998
Quote:
Originally Posted by big hammer View Post
there were a good few stock 4th gens touch 12's back in the day.
Yes, that specific run was made by Evan Smith though.
8cd03gro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-09-2011, 06:12 PM   #13
67rscamarovette
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 1967 Camaro RS LS1 6 speed,
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: So. Florida
Posts: 36
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
To date, the fastest stock Camaro is the current SS followed closely by the original ZL1

Its nice to see someone admit out front that their info could be wrong or incomplete. Overall, I'd agree with it although a few things did stand out when I looked at it

That 4th gen in the 12s seems highly suspect to me. Not sure if it was a hero run or not, but if it was I can find a 5th gen that beat it by 3 tenths. Anything that I've seen, the 1st gens were were much slower than you're posting -they had a hard time running the 1/4 in less than 14 seconds. Except for the original ZL1 that is, which I think had a stock time claimed to be in the low 13s or perhaps 13 flat. I forget which. I would guess that the '69 SS was "stock" not stock. Back in the day, if you didn't muck around inside the engine, you could still usually claim that you were stock. So you could arguably be using headers, retune the engine, tweak the suspension, put on some drag tires, and still be "stock". Today, we'd generally put a car like that in the bolt-ons or lightly modified category.


One final note ... the hp ratings from the 60's are 100% meaningless if you compare them to todays numbers. It was a different time back then. Automakers would inflate, then under rate their engines making it virtually impossible to know how much power they really made. That all changed when the SAE gross system was replaced with the SAE net rating system. For example, the fabled ZL1 was rumoured to pack over 500 hp, yet was officially rated at 430. That was in the 'anything goes' era of SAE gross. But in the early 70's, it is said to have been re-tested with the new testing procedures, and it came to 375 hp or so. Since then, SAE testing has undergone further revisions and probably became even more conservative (though I don't know this for a fact).



There's your "suspect" put to rest...

You gotta remember that firstgens were running on 7" Wide O Polyglass tires.. they were nylon, and absolute garbage.

The fastest Camaro from GM was the 2000 ZL1 with a 572. It ran 9.5 in the 1/4.
67rscamarovette is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10-10-2011, 02:15 AM   #14
LimaCharlie


 
LimaCharlie's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS/RS - 2004 Silverado
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: San Antonio, TX
Posts: 2,837
Quote:
Originally Posted by 67rscamarovette View Post


There's your "suspect" put to rest...

You gotta remember that firstgens were running on 7" Wide O Polyglass tires.. they were nylon, and absolute garbage.

The fastest Camaro from GM was the 2000 ZL1 with a 572. It ran 9.5 in the 1/4.
Ah, I remember those days. Being a GM fan my entire driving life, I really loved reading and seeing the dominance of the LSX cars in the late 90's and 2000's. Why did Ford and Dodge have to REALLY get serious? Lol.
__________________
2011 Summit White Camaro 1SS/RS
-6.2 LS3, TR6060, 3.45, G80

2004 Black Silverado 1500 2WD Regular Cab, Short Bed
-5.3 LM7, 4L60E, 3.42, G80
LimaCharlie is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PEDDERS SUCCESSFULLY FITS 305s ON ALL 4 CORNERS! Info@PeddersUSA.com Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 467 06-11-2013 09:45 PM
Does the v6 have enough power? cstproductions Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 305 08-29-2012 09:27 PM
Im sure this has been asked before.. But forgive my innocence :) gmag21 Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 23 02-21-2010 10:29 PM
Drag Racing Suspension Kits Info@PeddersUSA.com Suspension / Chassis / Brakes 25 02-21-2010 08:48 PM
GM memo to dealers Moose 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 41 02-04-2010 07:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.