Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
sjm autoprod
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Camaro ZL1 Forum - ZL1 Specific Topics


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-18-2011, 09:09 PM   #1
ZLone
 
Drives: 13 IOM ZL1,63 split-win, Diablo 6.0
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: left coast
Posts: 58
GM Authority Site Poll - Would the Camaro be a better sports car if it were lighter?

Would the Camaro be a better sports car if it were lighter?

At the link below is a poll asking if the Camaro should be put on a diet


http://gmauthority.com/
ZLone is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2011, 09:25 PM   #2
Blueclyde

 
Blueclyde's Avatar
 
Drives: What's Next?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Northeast Metro Detroit
Posts: 1,593
I think lighter is generally better but comes with trade offs. I personally think the weight is no big deal but that's just me.
Blueclyde is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2011, 10:17 PM   #3
Rice Killer
Cooter
 
Rice Killer's Avatar
 
Drives: my wife crazy
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: SW WI
Posts: 570
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZLone View Post
Would the Camaro be a better sports car if it were lighter?

At the link below is a poll asking if the Camaro should be put on a diet


http://gmauthority.com/
Any sports car, or any car for that matter, would be better if it was lighter.
__________________
#1451 - 2012 ZL1 - White, Black Wheels, Manual, Suede Package, and Exposed Hood Insert. Delivered on 6/20/12. Thanks to Jason from Symdon Motors in Evansville, WI.
Rice Killer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2011, 10:57 PM   #4
fbodfather


 
fbodfather's Avatar
 
Drives: Camaros................
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Grosse Pointe Farms, MI (suburban Detroit)
Posts: 4,486
That's like saying "should the sun come up tomorrow???"


"Oh Lord - please deliver us from useless polls........"


__________________
fbodfather is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2011, 10:59 PM   #5
oldfriend


 
Drives: Fiat 500 E
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: 32.7607/N. 16.95947/W
Posts: 7,821
I would see that this way , get a bag of 50 lb and put that on the back of a athlete lets say a sprinter , then clock him from standstill to 50 yards , and till he stops , do the same test without weigh and see what happen , it's called inertia and moment , in another words it takes more effort to start moving and more time to slow it down [ just before turns] it means brakes will have to be applied early on on a heavier car .My 2 cents .
oldfriend is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-18-2011, 11:04 PM   #6
Southern Comfort
No Tags/Habitual Violator
 
Southern Comfort's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 ABM/LT/RS & z71
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: North Georgia
Posts: 2,339
Yes, it's a little on the heavy side for a sportscar. I am being diplomatic.
They really need a poll for this?
The better question would be
Are you willing to trade off some luxury for better performance?


Here are some ideas to lighten your sportscar.
Select the options you are willing to delete:
Air Conditioning
Radio
Excess air bags
Back seat
Passenger seat
Rear exit exhaust
Some lighting and wiring
Electric windows
Spare tire/flat tire kit

Select the items you would pay extra for:
Carbon fiber hood doors trunk
Lightweight glass
Race wheels & tires
Lithium battery
Southern Comfort is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 12:22 AM   #7
Scarrzz
No Fear-No Limits- Camaro
 
Scarrzz's Avatar
 
Drives: Suzuki Hayabusa
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Louisiana, CO, GA, TX, etc.
Posts: 2,008
Quote:
Originally Posted by ZLone View Post
Would the Camaro be a better sports car if it were lighter?

At the link below is a poll asking if the Camaro should be put on a diet


http://gmauthority.com/



Not necessarily.

Dirigibles are light, but neither fast nor nimble.
__________________
.
__________________________________
................................................The Faithful are Watching.
Scarrzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 12:24 AM   #8
GrnMchin
Not easy being Green
 
GrnMchin's Avatar
 
Drives: 67 Nova SS
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Olympia, WA
Posts: 2,235
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarrzz View Post
Not necessarily.

Dirigibles are light, but neither fast nor nimble.
But not a sports car, more like an air ship

An yes it could use a diet.
__________________
GrnMchin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 12:54 AM   #9
DGthe3
Moderator.ca
 
DGthe3's Avatar
 
Drives: 05 Grand Am GT
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Niagara, Canada
Posts: 23,377
Send a message via MSN to DGthe3
And coming next week:
Will the Camaro be a better sports car with more power?

And the week after that:
Will the Camaro be a better sports car with wider tires?

And after that:
Will the Camaro be a better sports car with a more responsive suspension?

And after that:
Will the Camaro be a better sports car with more of its weight towards the rear?


There are plenty of ways that the Camaro could be improved upon, if thats the only thing you're considering. But when you're juggling 100 parameters to make a even the simplest of decisions making one area better can easily hurt something else that you're trying to do (like keep cost low)

Quote:
Originally Posted by oldfriend View Post
I would see that this way , get a bag of 50 lb and put that on the back of a athlete lets say a sprinter , then clock him from standstill to 50 yards , and till he stops , do the same test without weigh and see what happen , it's called inertia and moment , in another words it takes more effort to start moving and more time to slow it down [ just before turns] it means brakes will have to be applied early on on a heavier car .My 2 cents .
Ok ... now, take a ~5'10, 150 lb runner and give him 50 lbs of extra muscle mass rather than dead weight and see how he runs. He's gunna be faster.

Its not just pure mass that affects things. Where it is, and what its doing there play an even bigger role than its mere existence. I'm getting kinda tired of people thinking of the weight on the Camaro as 'flab'. Sure, its heavy. But I think of it more as being heavy like an NFL linebacker rather than an armchair quarterback. It not there due to laziness ... it serves a purpose.

The Camaro is heavy due to a number of things. First, its a very stiff chassis. This helps with not only safety (remember that the Camaro aced the 2012 NHTSA safety tests) but it also improves the handling. When the body doesn't flex, the suspension can work better. To pull that mass out you have to either A) switch to more expensive materials B) reduce the strength C) make the car much smaller. Personally, I don't think any of those options are all that great.

There's also the independent rear suspension. Improving handling ability, ride quality, and weight distribution (and possibly centre of gravity ... not sure on that one though). Yes, it adds 150 lbs but it helps more than it hurts.
__________________
Note, if I've gotten any facts wrong in the above, just ignore any points I made with them
__________________
Originally Posted by FbodFather
My sister's dentist's brother's cousin's housekeeper's dog-breeder's nephew sells coffee filters to the company that provides coffee to General Motors......
........and HE WOULD KNOW!!!!
__________________

Camaro Fest sub-forum
DGthe3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 02:58 AM   #10
hairtrigger
 
Drives: 69 Chevelle SS396 2013 ZL1
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: West
Posts: 701
No it's not a Z06 or ZR1 but it's sure going to be a fun car to drive!! A poor man who needs a back seat and Vette technology will be buying this car. Like me.
__________________
hairtrigger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 09:23 AM   #11
OldScoolCamaro


 
Drives: Camaro's, always have, always will.
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Home of the brave
Posts: 4,851
Quote:
Originally Posted by Scarrzz View Post
Not necessarily.

Dirigibles are light, but neither fast nor nimble.

Oh the humanity of it all......
__________________
In Scott We Trust...all others must show proof.
OldScoolCamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 10:05 AM   #12
2cnd chance
Too Many Great Choices
 
2cnd chance's Avatar
 
Drives: Z06, GS or ZL1?
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: The Road
Posts: 6,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by DGthe3 View Post
And coming next week:
Will the Camaro be a better sports car with more power?

And the week after that:
Will the Camaro be a better sports car with wider tires?

And after that:
Will the Camaro be a better sports car with a more responsive suspension?

And after that:
Will the Camaro be a better sports car with more of its weight towards the rear?


There are plenty of ways that the Camaro could be improved upon, if thats the only thing you're considering. But when you're juggling 100 parameters to make a even the simplest of decisions making one area better can easily hurt something else that you're trying to do (like keep cost low)


Ok ... now, take a ~5'10, 150 lb runner and give him 50 lbs of extra muscle mass rather than dead weight and see how he runs. He's gunna be faster.

Its not just pure mass that affects things. Where it is, and what its doing there play an even bigger role than its mere existence. I'm getting kinda tired of people thinking of the weight on the Camaro as 'flab'. Sure, its heavy. But I think of it more as being heavy like an NFL linebacker rather than an armchair quarterback. It not there due to laziness ... it serves a purpose.

The Camaro is heavy due to a number of things. First, its a very stiff chassis. This helps with not only safety (remember that the Camaro aced the 2012 NHTSA safety tests) but it also improves the handling. When the body doesn't flex, the suspension can work better. To pull that mass out you have to either A) switch to more expensive materials B) reduce the strength C) make the car much smaller. Personally, I don't think any of those options are all that great.

There's also the independent rear suspension. Improving handling ability, ride quality, and weight distribution (and possibly centre of gravity ... not sure on that one though). Yes, it adds 150 lbs but it helps more than it hurts.
Great post!!!
2cnd chance is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 10:13 AM   #13
BiggFoot
 
BiggFoot's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro (M6) 711 RWHP/680 RWTQ
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Houston
Posts: 543
I wouldnt change a thing. Other, lighter cars cant hook due to not enough azz end to hugg the ground. Not this Bad Boy!!

Name:  ZL1-rear.jpg
Views: 570
Size:  107.6 KB

If a car could speak, this ZL1 would be saying "Whose Your Daddy"!!
BiggFoot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-19-2011, 11:58 AM   #14
htron50


 
htron50's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 ZL1
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: SC
Posts: 2,462
Maybe this forum is getting a little heavy on "Einstein" discussions.....
__________________
2012 CAMARO-ZL1
Sincere Thanks to City Chevrolet, Charlotte, NC http://www.citychevrolet.com/blog/ca...et-camaro-zl1/
htron50 is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5th Gen Suspension -- The Book JusticePete Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 151 05-07-2015 05:52 PM
GM unveils Jay Leno Camaro, Camaro Synergy, Camaro Chroma, Camaro Dusk at SEMA irocnroll 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 101 02-27-2012 12:25 PM
an awesome day on the pacific coast highway (aka my camaro review, long, pics) diddiyo Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 10 07-08-2010 07:54 PM
Some thoughts on "recent" developments on this site.... fbodfather 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 258 05-08-2009 10:24 PM
Ambient lighting (ABL) - the FINAL update = LIMITED TO DOOR PANELS CamaroScotty 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 338 04-15-2009 05:33 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:15 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.