Camaro 2010 SS First 1/4 Mile Test - Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums

theshadow1234 · 04-23-2009, 11:39 AM

Sorry guys...Im not sure if this is a repost but just ran into this video on the the tube...

Hennessey Performance tests their bone stock 2010 Camaro SS at Lonestar Motorsports Park and runs 13.6 @ 108 mph with a 2.3 60 ft.

UCF w00t · 04-23-2009, 11:40 AM

(click video to go to youtube as they have it in HD)

theshadow1234 · 04-23-2009, 11:40 AM

Ah Thanks!

BackinBlackSS/RS · 04-23-2009, 11:42 AM

2.3 60ft

no wonder time stunk. Got anyone else that can drive?

dodson914 · 04-23-2009, 11:43 AM

That's pretty disappointing. Can't wait until we see members start posting times.

UCF w00t · 04-23-2009, 11:45 AM

Yea, that 0-60 was crap. Even the mags got better times. I bet he went a lil slow on purpose. Think about it... they're trying to sell upgrades. It benefits them to have a bigger "increase".

BackinBlackSS/RS · 04-23-2009, 11:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

Yea, that 0-60 was crap. Even the mags got better times. I bet he went a lil slow on purpose. Think about it... they're trying to sell upgrades. It benefits them to have a bigger "increase".

Oh dude, I did not think of that. You nailed it.

Captain Awesome · 04-23-2009, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BackinBlackSS/RS

2.3 60ft

no wonder time stunk. Got anyone else that can drive?

I don't know this guy? Is he independent? Or is he a tuner who's going to "dog it" in the stock runs so when he starts modding it that the performance increase is made much better when he drives it well?

theshadow1234 · 04-23-2009, 11:48 AM

What were the times that the other MAGS had @ Stock?

Thanks.

Crowley · 04-23-2009, 11:48 AM

It will be interesting to see what real people can do with this .. I'm not to worried about the 13.6 as w/ the 2.3 60' time as usually 1 on the little end is worth 2 on the top end .. so a 2.0 would come in around 13.0 .. I'm more worried about the 108mph .. seems very low for the manual ..

Crowley

Captain Awesome · 04-23-2009, 11:48 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

Yea, that 0-60 was crap. Even the mags got better times. I bet he went a lil slow on purpose. Think about it... they're trying to sell upgrades. It benefits them to have a bigger "increase".

Nevermind what I just asked.

Thanks.

2010 2-Tone · 04-23-2009, 11:50 AM

I agree that the car is quite a bit quicker than that. That is the slowest time that I have yet by anyone.

BackinBlackSS/RS · 04-23-2009, 11:55 AM

He really looked like he was out for a Sunday drive.

fdjizm · 04-23-2009, 11:59 AM

yet when you guys post crap slow mustang runs everyone claps and swears thats what they really run lol..."waving at pot calling the kettle black" gotta love it

BackinBlackSS/RS · 04-23-2009, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by fdjizm

yet when you guys post crap slow mustang runs everyone claps and swears thats what they really run lol..."waving at pot calling the kettle black" gotta love it

You got a little brother complex. Chill dude.

fdjizm · 04-23-2009, 12:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by BackinBlackSS/RS

You got a little brother complex. Chill dude.

just pointing out hypocrites. thats always fun.

and this guy cant drive.

toehead93 · 04-23-2009, 12:10 PM

Well, there's a diffrence. If a Mustang can run 13.3 with a 2.0 60' time and a Camaro can run 13.3 with 2.3 60' time they are not equally as fast. It's not because we don't like Mustnags. Some peolpe on this board think the Camaro can hang with the GT500 becuase one magizine ran a crappy 1/4 mile time. It goes both ways, unfortunately.

From what I've read about Hennessey Performance and some of the posts I've seen on other boards from the owner I trust anything they claim or advertise. Like someone already said this run may have been sandbagged for a reason.

fdjizm · 04-23-2009, 12:12 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by toehead93

Well, there's a diffrence. If a Mustang can run 13.3 with a 2.0 60' time and a Camaro can run 13.3 with 2.3 60' time they are not equally as fast. It's not because we don't like Mustnags.

From what I've read about Hennessey Performance and some of the posts I've seen on other boards from the owner I trust anything they claim or advertise. Like someone already said this run may have been sandbagged for a reason.

i didnt say they were equal the camaro is faster, but as soon as someone runs a slow time in a mustang it gets posted as if thats all the mustang can do. no matter how horrible the driver was.

SilverTurtle · 04-23-2009, 12:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by UCF w00t

Yea, that 0-60 was crap. Even the mags got better times. I bet he went a lil slow on purpose. Think about it... they're trying to sell upgrades. It benefits them to have a bigger "increase".

exactly... of course they're going to get a crappy stock time... they're not trying to get a good stock timeslip... they're trying to make themselves look better when they modify it... and, btw, this is a trick that Saleen and Hennessey are both guilty of doing

1_2Many · 04-23-2009, 12:17 PM

Definitely didn't push the car. Launch was poor...shifts were slow and it looks like premature. Just lost a little respect for Hennessey Performance.

Vash · 04-23-2009, 12:32 PM

Well... I would want to know how much the broke it in first too.

If they did that right off the truck that's not not a proper way to get numbers.

They should improve after a few 1000 miles.

And don't take that advice that's the LAST thing you want to do with a 1 day old car.

Unless your rich or a company and don't care about the longevity of the vehicle.

THE EVIL TW1N · 04-23-2009, 12:40 PM

I think this is about what an average driver will run at the track with this car. Nothing out of the ordinary really.

themossman · 04-23-2009, 12:41 PM

That was the WORST advertising video ever....

earn88hardt · 04-23-2009, 12:41 PM

nothing like walking it out of the hole and granny shifting it that guy will never win a race

djsnoflake · 04-23-2009, 01:02 PM

..............wait, he shifted into 4th at the strip? That seems weird........

04-23-2009, 11:39 AM	#1
theshadow1234 Drives: Shelby GT500 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Pearland, TX Posts: 215	Camaro 2010 SS First 1/4 Mile Test Sorry guys...Im not sure if this is a repost but just ran into this video on the the tube... Hennessey Performance tests their bone stock 2010 Camaro SS at Lonestar Motorsports Park and runs 13.6 @ 108 mph with a 2.3 60 ft. Last edited by theshadow1234; 04-23-2009 at 12:02 PM.

04-23-2009, 11:48 AM	#10
Crowley Okie doke Drives: 2012 GT500 Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: McKinney Texas Posts: 3,770 View My Garage	It will be interesting to see what real people can do with this .. I'm not to worried about the 13.6 as w/ the 2.3 60' time as usually 1 on the little end is worth 2 on the top end .. so a 2.0 would come in around 13.0 .. I'm more worried about the 108mph .. seems very low for the manual .. Crowley __________________

04-23-2009, 12:17 PM	#20
1_2Many Drives: 2008 Suzuki SX4 Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: SoCal Posts: 786 View My Garage	Definitely didn't push the car. Launch was poor...shifts were slow and it looks like premature. Just lost a little respect for Hennessey Performance. __________________ We are the early orderers...we are GM's voluntary guinea pigs and their free source of feedback. How will we be thanked?

Similar Threads
Thread	Thread Starter	Forum	Replies	Last Post
Camaro Product Manager - interview	Moose	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	11	04-04-2012 07:10 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release	Tran	Camaro Convertible Forum	12	11-18-2009 08:05 PM
Tom Henry Racing Announces a Special Edition 2010 Camaro!	TAG UR IT	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	72	04-30-2009 01:57 PM
Edmunds Inside Line Review - Road Tests 2010 Chevrolet Camaro SS ONLINE!	Supermans	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	77	03-23-2009 10:15 AM
UPCOMING CAMARO IMPORTANT DATES	CamaroScotty	5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions	125	01-11-2009 01:31 AM

04-23-2009, 11:40 AM	#2
UCF w00t Geek Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Orlando Posts: 4,456	(click video to go to youtube as they have it in HD)

04-23-2009, 11:42 AM	#4
BackinBlackSS/RS Go Blue!!!!! Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Indiana Posts: 23,364	2.3 60ft no wonder time stunk. Got anyone else that can drive?

04-23-2009, 11:43 AM	#5
dodson914 Drives: 2008 2500 HD; 2008 G8 GT #199 Join Date: Apr 2009 Location: Arlington, TX Posts: 239	That's pretty disappointing. Can't wait until we see members start posting times.

04-23-2009, 11:45 AM	#6
UCF w00t Geek Drives: IOM 2010 Camaro 2SS Join Date: Oct 2008 Location: Orlando Posts: 4,456	Yea, that 0-60 was crap. Even the mags got better times. I bet he went a lil slow on purpose. Think about it... they're trying to sell upgrades. It benefits them to have a bigger "increase".

04-23-2009, 11:50 AM	#12
2010 2-Tone Drives: 2010 RY 2SS with Custom Stripes Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Jennings, La. Posts: 2,287 View My Garage	I agree that the car is quite a bit quicker than that. That is the slowest time that I have yet by anyone.

04-23-2009, 11:55 AM	#13
BackinBlackSS/RS Go Blue!!!!! Drives: 2012 Cruze LT Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: Indiana Posts: 23,364	He really looked like he was out for a Sunday drive.

04-23-2009, 11:59 AM	#14
fdjizm Account Suspended Drives: 2008 Mustang GT/CS Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: New Jersey Posts: 1,429 View My Garage	yet when you guys post crap slow mustang runs everyone claps and swears thats what they really run lol..."waving at pot calling the kettle black" gotta love it

04-23-2009, 12:10 PM	#17
toehead93 Drives: 2014 2SS/1LE Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: wpb fl Posts: 2,790 View My Garage	Well, there's a diffrence. If a Mustang can run 13.3 with a 2.0 60' time and a Camaro can run 13.3 with 2.3 60' time they are not equally as fast. It's not because we don't like Mustnags. Some peolpe on this board think the Camaro can hang with the GT500 becuase one magizine ran a crappy 1/4 mile time. It goes both ways, unfortunately. From what I've read about Hennessey Performance and some of the posts I've seen on other boards from the owner I trust anything they claim or advertise. Like someone already said this run may have been sandbagged for a reason.

04-23-2009, 12:32 PM	#21
Vash Drives: 00 Blazer Join Date: Aug 2008 Location: Texas Posts: 5,128	Well... I would want to know how much the broke it in first too. If they did that right off the truck that's not not a proper way to get numbers. They should improve after a few 1000 miles. And don't take that advice that's the LAST thing you want to do with a 1 day old car. Unless your rich or a company and don't care about the longevity of the vehicle.

04-23-2009, 12:40 PM	#22
THE EVIL TW1N Banned Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: CA Posts: 2,925	I think this is about what an average driver will run at the track with this car. Nothing out of the ordinary really.

04-23-2009, 12:41 PM	#23
themossman Apprehensive Optimist Drives: '10 SS/RS SIM Join Date: Sep 2008 Location: JAX Posts: 1,386	That was the WORST advertising video ever....

04-23-2009, 12:41 PM	#24
earn88hardt Drives: 2010 IOM Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2008 Location: Massillon Ohio Posts: 173 View My Garage	nothing like walking it out of the hole and granny shifting it that guy will never win a race

04-23-2009, 01:02 PM	#25
djsnoflake Faith Keeper Drives: 2012 Silverado LTZ, 2010 2SS/RS Join Date: Nov 2008 Location: Saskatoon, Saskatchewan Canada Posts: 2,791 View My Garage	..............wait, he shifted into 4th at the strip? That seems weird........