![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Camaro V6 LLT Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
|
crazier than a coconut
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,488
|
Black ICE vs MACE 25mm
ok folks...here it is. something a lot of you have been waiting patiently for.
as a lot of you know, i was previously running with MACE's 25mm insulator. Tracy was kind enough to send me a Black ICE to do a comparison test and i finally managed to get some dyno time this afternoon. this write up will give factual data and comparison data (aka: butt dyno). 3wks ago i made the switch to the Black ICE so i could run it through its course for comparison purposes. i was a bit skeptical, but it did perform as Tracy claims by reducing the heat soak. heat soak temps weren't taken during this test with a thermometer, but after sitting, heat temps on the IM climbed faster over time vs the MACE-o-lator, can probably contribute that mostly to the thickness of the insulators in comparison. so...today i reset the tune as i didn't want the ECU to have any learn value of one insulator over the other. 1mi drive to the dyno shop and the Black ICE was up first and pulled 279HP. marilyn (the camaro's given name) sat on the dyno while the insulators were swapped out and the MACE-o-lator was dyno'ed about 1hr 20min later. one thing i've noticed, is this motor pulls better as it warms up as all the consecutive pulls continue to gain 2-3HP. if i had the dyno for the day, then i would have swapped out parts and let the ECU relearn, but nobody got paid other than the dyno shop. the comparison was done this way so there could be no disputing of weather (temp, baro, humidity) or different dyno's, or any other factor that might skew the results. obviously, resetting the tune and driving exactly 50mi's for each insulator would provide more drastic results but i don't have the time or money to foot that bill. just a simple side by side comparison. Black ICE = 279 HP / 250 TQ green line MACE-o-lator = 276 HP / 255 TQ pinkish/grey line TEMP: awaiting update HUMIDITY: " BARO: " FUEL: E85 those were the facts... here's what my butt dyno tells me... after making the swap to the Black ICE and putting some good miles on it is when i started to pay attention to my butt dyno. there was a bit more pep in the step, but didn't really set in till around 4K RPM. it was noticeable, but just not the same as with the MACE-o-lator. MACE's 25mm starts around 2500ish RPM and pulls hard up till redline. this is where i believe putting more miles on the car between pulls would have been the most beneficial. the increase in runner length is also evident with the shift of the HP band to the left by about 250 RPM. conclusion: both products are a must, especially when it comes to bang for the buck, for the price, you can't go wrong with either. both are top quality backed by great customer service and support. both install easily, a true DIY install. one thing i like about the MACE-o-lator is the ease to port match it to both the IM and heads (pre-matched during production). Black ICE bolts up using OEM bolts. My personal unbiased preference (simply based on performance) is the MACE 25mm as its a night and day difference on the road. for those with the vararam, you know what im talking about. thanks goes to both Tracy and Steve for the opportunity to be involved with product development and their contribution to the C5 community...
__________________
Last edited by hapisok; 03-30-2012 at 07:50 PM. |
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
:chevy:
Drives: 2LT/RS Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,346
|
wow awesome review man!
This should be good news for those who are on the fence Both a re great products, both pull great numbers, now where does one want the power band? Well that all depends on the specific driver. I love the Black Ice VR combo, the reason I bought it was because I knew they would work well together for sure. Shortly after I realized the MACE 25 works with the VR. Either way happy, either way no one can go wrong. Im curious in all honesty to try the Maceolator
__________________
CAMARO
Consult your doctor before taking Camaro Side effects include Sudden increase in Heart Rate, Insomnia and occasional hallucinations If you experience Permagrin exceeding 4 hours after taking Camaro, seek immediate Camaro5 Help CAMARO Bringing excitment back into the Garage |
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
it's mind bottling..
Drives: a visually loud in color camaro Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Best place on earth
Posts: 3,902
|
thanks for the review.
how much rwhp are you putting out with all your mods ? and do you have the cam in ? pm me please
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
crazier than a coconut
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,488
|
i agree, they are both great and work. wish i could have spent the day working this, dyno one in the am...drive and the other in the afternoon. would have shown more dramatic and realistic gains for each. the power band shift is very interesting, and hope to do some more work in this area in the future. like you said, it comes down to the driver. personally, i'd rather be quick than fast...1/4 mi is only...well, a 1/4 mi.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Southwestspeed.net
![]() Drives: '10 2SS/RS, '96 Z28 Join Date: May 2009
Location: Rio Rancho, NM
Posts: 10,313
|
Wow...this is awesome.
Really fantastic to get this sort of info from the streets and not just from us vendors. It's one thing to hear it from all of us but when it comes from the customers I feel that it speaks volumes more than any of us ever could. Thank you for taking the time and effort to share this with everybody here. What a great forum. Ivan @ Southwest Speed
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#6 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro LS M6 Inferno Orange Join Date: May 2010
Location: Lebanon, OH
Posts: 1,548
|
Thanks for doing this comparison. Just for kicks, I would like to see the black ice-olator stacked on top of the mace 25mm.
__________________
Gordy
Injen CAI / Solo Mach-X LLT / Solo High-flow res-cats / Barton short shifter / RX Catch Can / RPI Gills / 35% tint / LED Footwell Lighting Front & Rear / Pedders Street 1 / Pedders steering rack bushing / SS struts / Pfadt drop springs / VMax Ported Throttle Body / Spohn Toe Rods / Spohn Trailing Arms / Trifecta Tune / MACE 25mm Intake Spacers Find me on Facebook: http://www.facebook.com/gahammerle |
|
|
|
|
|
#7 | |
|
crazier than a coconut
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,488
|
Quote:
guess we'll see.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() Drives: 2LT/RS Join Date: May 2011
Location: Maryland
Posts: 59
|
I just finished installing my 25mm Mace this afternoon and found that the Mace pulled very hard from 2500rpm to the red line as well. I also found that at 2000rpm I had a lot more power than before. I don't know if it was the sum of all the recent mods but I am very pleased with Mace.
Thank you for your review.
__________________
Injen CAI, JBA Shorty, MRV2, Vmax Throttle Boby,Mace 25MM,Ported Manifold,3.73 Gears,Barton Shifter. |
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,705
|
Aaron, you are the man bro!! Look like you really can't go wrong with either and each has a slight difference in hp/tq but as expected. Longer runner length, more peak tq(there's over 10ft lb of tq difference in mid rpm). Shorter runner length, more peak hp.
No more mace vs iceolator bullshyt Both win!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#10 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Bmore,
You're running Mace + Vararam right? I really need to see your car in person so I can see the fit vs. my Vararam only. |
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,705
|
I will tell you now...there was no way for me to run vararam the way it come with 25mm insulator. I had to modify the rear neck to an angle to make it work for the front gap to have enough room for air. I actually made the gap bigger too
. It scared me a little since I didn't know if the angle was going to mess up the original airflow characteristic, but everything look good, from my fuel trims to ignition timing, perfect!I can put up some pics or I can even meet up with you one day.. just let me know. |
|
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
B.O.D. 02/16/10
|
I have been waiting for a write up like this since these two products hit the market. Like it was said, where do you want your power band to be at. Well mine is going for the 1/4 mile -1/8 mile so it looks as if my money will be going towards Mace. Thanks for your time and effort plus money to really nail down these awesome products.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2001 Camaro SS Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 8,050
|
Well done. We respect the Mace products as we do any other porven competing products that we know are good and perform as advertised, direct competitor or not we post it like we see it and some dont want to here that (were talking all products we manufacture or endorse). When we praise a competitors product it has earned it, and the same as when we point out those falling short. Any that know us well know we do our evaluations based upon actual findings and dont play brand or corporate politics as so many do. I know many think it makes no sense to acknolwledge anothers products as good or great when they compete against us and then the personal ego's pop up and it can turn into blind side taking and that is never good for any involved. But as with other products we have praised, the Mace units perform as advertised and we respect them and what they have accomplished. You cant go worng with either.
__________________
www.RevXtreme.com
941-721-1826 Turbo & Supercharging specialist VMax porting development from the begining RX Super Chiller |
|
|
|
|
|
#14 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2011 LS Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: FL
Posts: 1,693
|
Nice to see the side by side comparison and runner length theories seem to be held up with the evidence. little more hp with shorter and a little more torque with the longer. Good to see it in black and white thanks for you effort!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#15 |
|
B.O.D. 02/16/10
|
Tracy, you sir are a class act! This makes this decision even harder to make. I have an 1/8 mile track just down the road from me so I am going to side with the torque numbers. That being said, I haven't shot the money to Mace yet and could be back on the black side when I make up my mind tonite
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#16 | |
![]() Drives: 2010 Camaro RS Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 38
|
Quote:
I should have my VR tonight and am looking forward to the 25mm and VR. Thanks. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#17 |
|
crazier than a coconut
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS LS3 Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: virginia
Posts: 1,488
|
this is what the forum is all about. i have a lot of respect for both tracy and steve and appreciate their hard work, tireless effort and dedication to responding to 1,000,001 PM's a day. without guys like them, we would still be talking about who has the best sounding exhaust or which CAI is numero uno. and thanks to the rest of the forum...yes, you! who make coming here and sharing ideas and good times part of my everyday routine. its like fat kids and cake, whitney houston and crack, macon and bacon...mmmm bacon.
thanks again to everyone
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#18 |
|
B.O.D. 02/16/10
|
![]()
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#19 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: '10 ABM LT/RS, 01 Ford Ranger Join Date: May 2009
Location: Jefferson City, Missouri
Posts: 6,960
|
Well at least now I can come out and say that I knew that at least one of you MACE folk were also doing testing for the RX units lol.
This is a great thread and pretty much confirms what I thought. I will say that I was thinking that the MACE might be the superior product because of its runner length, and it appears that it does pull a bit better down low, but good to see they both perform well in the upper ranges. I would have had the MACE product, but the RX works perfectly with the VR and I was a bit scared to modify the VR intake. Still very happy with the black ice-olator. Jay maybe you can shoot me a picture or two sometime of your modification to the VR tube...I'd like to see that lol.
__________________
Shes ALL MINE! - 8/24/2009 2G1FB1EV2A9133373
|
|
|
|
|
|
#20 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: jealous vendors mad!! HAHA!! Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: CYBERGMONSTER@GMAIL.COM
Posts: 3,705
|
Keith, predotarian, chad.. I got you
again, nice job aaron. This is what is all about. There's nothing better than a non biased straight up result. Both product get |
|
|
|
|
|
#21 |
![]() Drives: 2011 Camaro LS Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: KC MO
Posts: 568
|
Well I was hoping you were going to say the black ice was hands down the better product cuz I just bought one and am waiting for it to arrive lol. I'm sure I'll love the ice but the mace is going to be the one that got away and I'll always wonder if I would have liked it better eventho they both sound good. Why do we have to make choices??? You always wonder what was behind door number two lol.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#22 |
|
Account Suspended
Drives: Green Dream Machine Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Waterloo, IA AUN
Posts: 299
|
I feel the Black Ice-Olator is the perfect fit for me, Really only drive my car on hot sunny days and the heat is a power killer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#23 |
|
pistolgripcopo1
Drives: 2010 SS Camaro Carbon fiber gray Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Corona Ca.
Posts: 376
|
Good job
__________________
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
#24 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
This is probably the best comparison test I have read since Janetty did the CAI tests early last year. This is how it should be done, thanks Hapi for taking the time and stepping up.
I have the Mace and pretty damn happy with it I chose it after reading about runner length differences and deciding that I want more torque that horses, I have plenty of horses already
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#25 |
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 593
|
Interesting test for sure. I would guess the mid-range gains are from the longer runner length. Plus it seems you have some quite extensive mods compared to what most folks are going to do to their cars.
What I would like to do is a test that more fits 90% of our customers from what I have seen. By that I mean is completely stock or minimal mods (VMax TB & CAI, No Tune, No Headers). This would be comparable to the testing I did for VMax and I think relate to a large portion of the buying market looking at these pieces. Since Tracy was nice enough to send an ICE-olator out for free to test, maybe MACE would not mind sending one of the 25mm units out to me to test on a CAI/TB only car ![]() If not, are there any US dealers for the MACE 25mm spacer kit? I would like to buy local (US) if at all possible. Thanks!! Mike Norris
__________________
Raymonds Performance
Mike Norris Motorsports www.mikenorrismotorsports.com 407-616-2518 thevettedr@aol.com |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|
Similar Threads
|
||||
| Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
| 2LT IOM, IO interior, black stripes, documenting my changes | rtcat600man | Member Car Journals | 172 | 05-07-2013 08:54 PM |
| Cadillac Reveals Black Diamond Edition CTS-V | FenwickHockey65 | General Automotive + Other Cars Discussion | 36 | 02-07-2011 11:21 AM |
| DSV/*********** Black Friday Blowout-Best Prices Of The Year 24 Hours Only!!!!! | Indpowr | Interior Parts & Accessories | 23 | 11-27-2010 11:26 AM |
| HELPPP can i use the ICE Wax on flat black stripes | Gavros 4 Life | Cosmetic Maintenance: Washing, Waxing, Detailing, Bodywork, Protection | 16 | 06-29-2010 08:30 AM |