Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
PFYC
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons

Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 05-04-2009, 05:00 PM   #1
MrGazinya

 
MrGazinya's Avatar
 
Drives: Aggressive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southampton, PA.
Posts: 1,067
New Camaro SS Dyno Pull 384.4 RWH

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redline Motorsports

Couldn't wait any longer............got 225 miles on the car (mostly to get the 87 octane fuel the dealer put in it out....).

Made two back to back pulls;

Coolant was 190, oil was 200

Here are the results!


http://www.5thgen.org/forum/showthread.php?t=12930



AFR was about 11.5 to 11.7 across the board............nice for the turbos!

Going to play with the tune in the next couple days!

Howard
.
__________________
Black 2SS RS LS3 Inferno Int. Powdercoated 20's {MODS} KOOKS LT: Borla S-Type: Roto-Fab CAI: Hurst ST.: Diabloed by Jannetty Racing: PFADT Stage 2, Trailing arms, Tie Rods:

MrGazinya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 05:09 PM   #2
Kyle2k
LVL 50 Troll Stomper
 
Kyle2k's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Grand Forks, ND
Posts: 3,244
auto or manual?
__________________
Kyle2k is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 05:15 PM   #3
LosXC451

 
LosXC451's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 SS SIM w/ RS
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Miami, Fl
Posts: 1,222
this car is gonna be fun
LosXC451 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 05:22 PM   #4
D1BADZ
hmmmmm
 
D1BADZ's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IOM in-n-out 2SS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: San Jose, Ca
Posts: 1,326
Quote:
Originally Posted by LosXC451 View Post
this car is gonna be fun
yes yes, it is quite a joy
__________________
"Responsibility is a Heavy Responsibilty" (Cheech)

D1BADZ is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 05:22 PM   #5
MrGazinya

 
MrGazinya's Avatar
 
Drives: Aggressive
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Southampton, PA.
Posts: 1,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by D1BADZ View Post
yes yes, it is quite a joy
__________________
Black 2SS RS LS3 Inferno Int. Powdercoated 20's {MODS} KOOKS LT: Borla S-Type: Roto-Fab CAI: Hurst ST.: Diabloed by Jannetty Racing: PFADT Stage 2, Trailing arms, Tie Rods:

MrGazinya is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 05:23 PM   #6
fieldgoal00
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2010 Chevy Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: New Orleans
Posts: 772
it's an ls3 based on the vin spreadsheet
fieldgoal00 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 05:28 PM   #7
Flynbyu
 
Flynbyu's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Corvette/2001 Tahoe
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 45
Wow.

Usually you'll loose 65-70 hp from the flywheel. You only lost 42 hp?

~Brian
Flynbyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 05:51 PM   #8
fdjizm
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2008 Mustang GT/CS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,429
What kind of correction was used on the dyno?
seems like before correction numbers.. which would mean 450 plus at the crank unless it's a factory freak.
fdjizm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 06:10 PM   #9
Flynbyu
 
Flynbyu's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Corvette/2001 Tahoe
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 45
Quote:
Originally Posted by fdjizm View Post
What kind of correction was used on the dyno?
seems like before correction numbers.. which would mean 450 plus at the crank unless it's a factory freak.
Kind of what I was thinking.

~Brian
Flynbyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 06:25 PM   #10
Craig
 
Drives: '01 Z28
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: GA
Posts: 173
That's comparable to what the LS3 Corvettes are putting down, so I doubt it's a freak. Those are impressive numbers, let's cross our fingers that they will turn out to be the norm.
Craig is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 06:26 PM   #11
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,046
HHHHHEEEELLLLLLOOOOOO!!!!

Nice. That's about what 'Vettes are puttin' down, isn't it? It'd be nice to know the factor, but this sounds pretty good
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 06:27 PM   #12
dankss
Contract Killer
 
dankss's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 black 1ss/rs
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Denver
Posts: 154
the dyno this was done on is a dyno dynamics, a little higher reading than the mustang dyno that the 364whp was done on.
dankss is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 07:21 PM   #13
Flynbyu
 
Flynbyu's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 Corvette/2001 Tahoe
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Fort Smith, AR
Posts: 45
The highest pull on an LS3 Corvette I've seen...392rwhp & 376 rwtrq, bone stock and I thought that was a little high. That's a great pull on the Camaro.....especially if the car is brand new with low miles.


~Brian
Flynbyu is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 07:29 PM   #14
Crowley
Okie doke
 
Crowley's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 GT500
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: McKinney Texas
Posts: 3,770
Very nice .. that is around where it should be (maybe a bit on the high side).... any info on the correction used etc?

thanks,
Crowley
__________________
Crowley is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 08:38 PM   #15
Andro
NOICE!!! ™
 
Andro's Avatar
 
Drives: Force Fed 427
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: GOT BOOST?
Posts: 5,216
__________________
Andro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 08:43 PM   #16
fdjizm
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2008 Mustang GT/CS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Crowley View Post
Very nice .. that is around where it should be (maybe a bit on the high side).... any info on the correction used etc?

thanks,
Crowley
idk about where it should be unless the car has 450 something at the crank there is no correction on that. i have heard of factory freaks but it's a bit high.
fdjizm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 09:41 PM   #17
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,046
LS1 F-bodies were underated too. If that's the case, that's not suprising. I thought Dyno Dynamics were conservative like Mustang Dyno. I know it's an inertia type.
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 09:46 PM   #18
BowtieGuy
Enlightened
 
BowtieGuy's Avatar
 
Drives: Nothing Currently
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Oklahoma
Posts: 1,300
Tasty
__________________
If you believe it is your right to speak freely no matter the content, relevance, or intelligence of statement, then it is my duty to the powers that be to set you straight.

People have to talk about something just to keep their voice boxes in working order. So they'll have good voice boxes in case there's ever anything really meaningful to say.
Kurt Vonnegut
BowtieGuy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-04-2009, 09:46 PM   #19
08z51c6
 
Drives: 2008 C6 Corvette
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: DE
Posts: 91
Numbers do seem a bit high, but either way that's still impressive. Especially since the motor isn't broken in. The nice thing is the LS3 responds very well to even just basic mods. There are going to be a lot of nasty Camaro's out there soon!!!!
08z51c6 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 12:37 AM   #20
KarFan
 
KarFan's Avatar
 
Drives: CARS
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 479
Wow I'd be quite ticked if the dealer put in 87 octane on my new Camaro SS

Great numbers but it doesn't mean much. I'm far more curious on how the car runs. Then we'll know something.
KarFan is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 01:38 AM   #21
LS3SSRS

 
LS3SSRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 IBM SS/RS
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 808
schwing!! nice #'s
__________________
2SS/RS, 6spd manual, IBM w/black leather
Blacked out tail/signal lights, 5% rear tint, 20% sides, Dynomax Bullet exhaust, Barton short throw shifter, Clear Image offroad downpipes
LS3SSRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 02:08 AM   #22
2010 SS RS

 
2010 SS RS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 2SS/RS IBM Black Polished
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Colorado
Posts: 2,130
Thanks for running the dyno. Any Video? Always fun to watch and you never know when its going to blast off thru the wall....never seen happen but always wanted to..lol
__________________
418 Stroker, 621RWHP 648 lbs TORQUE Built by Laramie GM Auto Center Tuned by Nick at Mac Autosport. EForce SC, 2 3/4pulley,LPE dual fuel pump, JRE Twin fuel rail upgrade, posi clutch kit, RX oilcatch can and breather, Callies Compstar crankshaft and rods, Racing bearings, CP -13.8 race pistons, steel rings, Comp Cams X6 blower cam, Springs, HD timing chain and tensioner, Doug Thorley Tri Y LT headers, 89.7lb injectors, RPM rollbar, DSS1400 shafts, Simpson 5 pt harness, BMR Toe rods and trailing arms, led lights, RPM input and output shafts
2010 SS RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 03:58 AM   #23
THE EVIL TW1N
Banned
 
Drives: 2003 Cobra Convertible
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: CA
Posts: 2,925
Quote:
Originally Posted by radz282003 View Post
LS1 F-bodies were underated too. If that's the case, that's not suprising. I thought Dyno Dynamics were conservative like Mustang Dyno. I know it's an inertia type.
That's a misconception

Dyno Dynamics are load based dyno's, just like Mustang Dyno's.

They are better tuning tools, but the numbers they spit out are much more erratic. They can be made to show almost anything and most have corrections to get similar numbers you would see on a DynoJet, but are easy to fudge as well because the load based dyno's have much more criteria to fill in while DynoJets have MUCH less variables.


BTW, the 364 rwhp we saw before was on a DynoJet and was corrected to SAE. This dyno run seems as if it wasn't (probably STD) but even if it were corrected to SAE, it is not directly comparable to dyno runs that are typically seen on the net (DynoJet).


Also, another note. The LS3 is not underrated, its SAE Certified, it can't be underrated. It must make within +-1% of its rated power.
THE EVIL TW1N is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 06:53 AM   #24
rayhawk

 
rayhawk's Avatar
 
Drives: Trailblazer SS
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Miami
Posts: 891
Quote:
Originally Posted by THE EVIL TW1N View Post
That's a misconception

Dyno Dynamics are load based dyno's, just like Mustang Dyno's.

They are better tuning tools, but the numbers they spit out are much more erratic. They can be made to show almost anything and most have corrections to get similar numbers you would see on a DynoJet, but are easy to fudge as well because the load based dyno's have much more criteria to fill in while DynoJets have MUCH less variables.


BTW, the 364 rwhp we saw before was on a DynoJet and was corrected to SAE. This dyno run seems as if it wasn't (probably STD) but even if it were corrected to SAE, it is not directly comparable to dyno runs that are typically seen on the net (DynoJet).


Also, another note. The LS3 is not underrated, its SAE Certified, it can't be underrated. It must make within +-1% of its rated power.
Do you have the SAE spec that says that? I hear that alot (it can't be underrated) but nobody can show where it says that it has to be that close. It is not that I think it is overrated, I would just like to see the spec.
__________________
Hooters, hooters, yum yum yum, hooters, hooters on a girl thats dumb.
-Al Bundy

07 2WD Trailblazer SS, LS1 E-fans, 4" FWI, pcmforless tune
72 VW Beetle, 2275cc, Dual 44 IDF's

Last edited by rayhawk; 05-05-2009 at 03:16 PM. Reason: fixed overrated to underrated.
rayhawk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-05-2009, 06:57 AM   #25
fdjizm
Account Suspended
 
Drives: 2008 Mustang GT/CS
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 1,429
Quote:
Originally Posted by rayhawk View Post
Do you have the SAE spec that says that? I hear that alot (it can't be overrated) but nobody can show where it says that it has to be that close. It is not that I think it is overrated, I would just like to see the spec.
here you go

http://auto.ihs.com/news/newsletters...n-standard.htm

http://www.sae.org/certifiedpower/

hopefully the OP will come back and tell us about the correction. before people start expecting 450+ hp camaros.
fdjizm is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
V8 Camaro Performance Upgrades List Milk 1027 Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons 88 12-21-2014 10:28 PM
Official Camaro Convertible CONCEPT Press Release Tran Camaro Convertible Forum 12 11-18-2009 08:05 PM
4 SEMA CAMAROS finally unveiled by GM! (hi-res images & details) FenwickHockey65 Camaro Photos | Spyshots | Video | Media Gallery 237 11-03-2008 11:39 PM
AW: New Camaro a one trick pony? Scotsman 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 16 09-04-2008 10:07 PM
Camaro Chat 9:30-10:00 jdpickering 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 25 07-22-2008 03:11 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:56 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2014, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.