Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
HRE Wheels
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > General Camaro Forums > Chevy Camaro vs...


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 04-06-2012, 08:24 AM   #15
big hammer

 
Drives: 2002 ws6
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: manitoba
Posts: 1,123
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming View Post
Don't know about all day long..... Here is my brand new, 4 day old, 100% stock V6 Camaro beating a Mustang GT! Stopped the video a bit to early since I was laughing so hard... My buddy is behind the wheel of my Camaro, and my other friend is in his Mustang Shelby GT (NOT a GT500! just the dressed up GT). The Camaro beats the Mustang's ET by .002! Spinning ain't winning!



Moral of the story... any car can beat any other car, because sometimes SH*T HAPPENS!!! LOL!

massive massive driver fail. if that's the case my 02 t\a can beat a zr1.
__________________
Bolt on 2002 ls1 Trans am--- 11.5 @ 121 (1.72) 2000 da
big hammer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 08:31 AM   #16
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,132
Here are a few stock V6s I found quickly that have run 9.3 or better in the 1/8th.

DandD 9.306
Darkness 9.213
etmx183 9.236

I'm sure there are more, but it goes back to the original point. Something wasn't right if a GT was running 9.3s and easily beating the Camaro. Perhaps that was driver error, too.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 08:35 AM   #17
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Here are a few stock V6s I found quickly that have run 9.3 or better in the 1/8th.

DandD 9.306
Darkness 9.213
etmx183 9.236

I'm sure there are more, but it goes back to the original point. Something wasn't right if a GT was running 9.3s and easily beating the Camaro. Perhaps that was driver error, too.
Yep... could be driver error, coupled with a terrible case of heat soak! We know what a huge negative impact heat soak has on the LLT!
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 08:46 AM   #18
Stew


 
Drives: 92 Luminadead/01 Dakota/97 F150 4x4
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Eastern, Ky
Posts: 3,789
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming View Post
Yep... could be driver error, coupled with a terrible case of heat soak! We know what a huge negative impact heat soak has on the LLT!
SOmething else, the GT should have quicker than 9.3, probably at least an 8.9xx, seems like maybe weather/altitude?
Stew is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 09:14 AM   #19
NoWRX
Banned
 
Drives: 2011 STi - World Rally Blue
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 86
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
SOmething else, the GT should have quicker than 9.3, probably at least an 8.9xx, seems like maybe weather/altitude?
Bingo. If both cars are running slow times, it's either two bad drivers and/or track conditions.
NoWRX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 09:26 AM   #20
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,132
Which was what SCRMING originally asked. No response to that yet.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 09:36 AM   #21
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Which was what SCRMING originally asked. No response to that yet.
actually... went back to the first post and started re-reading....

I actually never asked any questions.... LOL!

HOWEVER, I did come across something in the OP original post I hadn't picked up on! (I have to stop skimming posts!)

Ok.. first part:

"My husband drove the GT first and was up against a Cynergy Green V6 Camaro. Our car is completely stock, and I am sure the Camaro was at least mostly stock. Maybe had a few things like filters, exhaust, etc. Nothing huge. Our GT beat the Mustang pretty badly. "

Ok, so it was Dr. Love's HUSBAND that beat the V6 Camaro...


But the second part is:

"When I ran the GT, my times stayed pretty consistent at 9.3 in the eighth."

So it was in fact Dr. Love that ran the 9.3, NOT her HUSBAND that beat the V6 Camaro... The question for Dr. Love now is, what was your HUSBAND's time? Do you happen to have HIS timeslip? Would sure help us understand things! Would really like to see his timeslip...
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 09:41 AM   #22
GretchenGotGrowl


 
GretchenGotGrowl's Avatar
 
Drives: 11 F150 EB/13 Sonic RS/15 Z06
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Little Rock, AR
Posts: 7,132
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stew View Post
SOmething else, the GT should have quicker than 9.3, probably at least an 8.9xx, seems like maybe weather/altitude?
Quote:
Originally Posted by NoWRX View Post
Bingo. If both cars are running slow times, it's either two bad drivers and/or track conditions.
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming View Post
actually... went back to the first post and started re-reading....

I actually never asked any questions.... LOL!

HOWEVER, I did come across something in the OP original post I hadn't picked up on! (I have to stop skimming posts!)

Ok.. first part:

"My husband drove the GT first and was up against a Cynergy Green V6 Camaro. Our car is completely stock, and I am sure the Camaro was at least mostly stock. Maybe had a few things like filters, exhaust, etc. Nothing huge. Our GT beat the Mustang pretty badly. "

Ok, so it was Dr. Love's HUSBAND that beat the V6 Camaro...


But the second part is:

"When I ran the GT, my times stayed pretty consistent at 9.3 in the eighth."

So it was in fact Dr. Love that ran the 9.3, NOT her HUSBAND that beat the V6 Camaro... The question for Dr. Love now is, what was your HUSBAND's time? Do you happen to have HIS timeslip? Would sure help us understand things! Would really like to see his timeslip...
Sorry, thought I remember you asking that.
__________________
New Ride -- 2015 Z06 2LZ (stock) -- Journal
Old Ride -- 2012 Camaro 2LT/RS (647 RWHP & 726 RWTQ) -- Build Thread
GretchenGotGrowl is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-06-2012, 09:42 AM   #23
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Sorry, thought I remember you asking that.
probably some other thread.... you know me... always asking for time slips! LOL
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2012, 07:50 PM   #24
Dr. Love
 
Dr. Love's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by GretchenGotGrowl View Post
Here are a few stock V6s I found quickly that have run 9.3 or better in the 1/8th.

DandD 9.306
Darkness 9.213
etmx183 9.236

I'm sure there are more, but it goes back to the original point. Something wasn't right if a GT was running 9.3s and easily beating the Camaro. Perhaps that was driver error, too.
This weekend at Beech Bend, I ran a 1/8th in 9.052 and a 1/4 in 13.998 in the bone stock GT. The Mustang is just getting faster and faster. Not sure how, but it is. First time it has ever been raced and we have only owned it since December. Plus, I am running street tires and couldn't get traction on the green. I maybe could have broke into the 8s if I had got more grip. Car has 100K miles on it. Stock tire pressure. No special air filters...Matter of fact, we took the time to take out the paper filter and dust it a little Saturday at the track.

The oil was changed today and the gas filter - which happened to be brown it was so dirty.

I love that this car is fast, and we do have all of the time slips to prove it. However, I was beat by a Dodge Neon RT with E85. Stock....

Here is the link to that race:

__________________
2010 1SS/RS Aqua Blue Metallic - code 61/wa638r
1994 Z-28 Medium Quasar Blue Metallic - code 80
1987 IROC Z Dark Blue - code 28/wa8743
1979 Berlinetta Light Blue Metallic - code 24




Dr. Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-08-2012, 07:51 PM   #25
Dr. Love
 
Dr. Love's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: TN
Posts: 622
Quote:
Originally Posted by scrming View Post
actually... went back to the first post and started re-reading....

I actually never asked any questions.... LOL!

HOWEVER, I did come across something in the OP original post I hadn't picked up on! (I have to stop skimming posts!)

Ok.. first part:

"My husband drove the GT first and was up against a Cynergy Green V6 Camaro. Our car is completely stock, and I am sure the Camaro was at least mostly stock. Maybe had a few things like filters, exhaust, etc. Nothing huge. Our GT beat the Mustang pretty badly. "

Ok, so it was Dr. Love's HUSBAND that beat the V6 Camaro...


But the second part is:

"When I ran the GT, my times stayed pretty consistent at 9.3 in the eighth."

So it was in fact Dr. Love that ran the 9.3, NOT her HUSBAND that beat the V6 Camaro... The question for Dr. Love now is, what was your HUSBAND's time? Do you happen to have HIS timeslip? Would sure help us understand things! Would really like to see his timeslip...
My husband's time was 9.4, worse than mine. I barely weight a 100 pounds, which helps me be faster than him.
__________________
2010 1SS/RS Aqua Blue Metallic - code 61/wa638r
1994 Z-28 Medium Quasar Blue Metallic - code 80
1987 IROC Z Dark Blue - code 28/wa8743
1979 Berlinetta Light Blue Metallic - code 24




Dr. Love is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2012, 06:33 AM   #26
2012 IngotSilver 5.0
FIVE.OH
 
2012 IngotSilver 5.0's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 Mustang 5.0
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Upstate NY
Posts: 648
Quote:
Originally Posted by big hammer View Post
massive massive driver fail. if that's the case my 02 t\a can beat a zr1.
HAHAHAHAHA! Awesome response.

Glad to see someone here actually knows something about drag racing.
__________________
2012 Ingot Silver 5.0
Base/Stick
2012 IngotSilver 5.0 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2012, 06:53 AM   #27
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr. Love View Post
This weekend at Beech Bend, I ran a 1/8th in 9.052 and a 1/4 in 13.998 in the bone stock GT. The Mustang is just getting faster and faster. Not sure how, but it is. First time it has ever been raced and we have only owned it since December. Plus, I am running street tires and couldn't get traction on the green. I maybe could have broke into the 8s if I had got more grip. Car has 100K miles on it. Stock tire pressure. No special air filters...Matter of fact, we took the time to take out the paper filter and dust it a little Saturday at the track.

The oil was changed today and the gas filter - which happened to be brown it was so dirty.

I love that this car is fast, and we do have all of the time slips to prove it. However, I was beat by a Dodge Neon RT with E85. Stock....

Here is the link to that race:

Nice run!

Weather conditions can have a huge impact on your car's performance... You can see big swings in your car's times just from varying weather conditions. Also track prep can make a big difference. A small improvement in your 60' time can have a big impact on your overall ET.
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 04-09-2012, 06:57 AM   #28
scrming
Red Brick of Vengeance!
 
scrming's Avatar
 
Drives: 12 Second Brick
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: at my pulpit
Posts: 7,745
Quote:
Originally Posted by 2012 IngotSilver 5.0 View Post
HAHAHAHAHA! Awesome response.

Glad to see someone here actually knows something about drag racing.
The point is any car can beat any other car on any given day... ALSO, the whole idea of a 3v GT > V6 Camaro "all day long" shows a lack of knowledge about the V6 Camaro... Dr. Love is getting some typical 14 second runs in the 3v GT..... Now go look at the V6 Camaro quick list (bolt-ons). Explain to me how the 3v GT is greater than the V6 Camaro, "all day long"?

BTW... yeah, i know a thing or two about drag racing...
scrming is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
5th Gen Suspension -- The Book JusticePete Suspension / Brakes / Chassis 151 05-07-2015 05:52 PM
Thank you Camaro Comrades! Camaro & Corvette made up 1/3 of 2011 Sports Cars Sales fbodfather 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 105 03-13-2012 11:36 AM
Camaro Still winning - Mustang sales not enough to sustain Flat Rock plant Rogue Leader 5th Gen Camaro SS LS LT General Discussions 141 07-02-2011 07:19 AM
* * * 2011 Camaro / SEMA Special Edition News * * * CamaroScotty Camaro Price | Ordering | Tracking | Dealers Discussions 16 11-06-2010 06:43 AM
Over 230 Satisfied 2010 Camaro Customers! Paddock Chevrolet has 40 in stock NOW camarojoe Dealer Camaros for Sale 2 05-24-2010 05:58 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:23 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.