Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
Centerforce Clutches
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons

Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 06-11-2012, 11:22 AM   #151
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birm View Post
Read the first page of the thread
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 11:31 AM   #152
Birm



 
Birm's Avatar
 
Drives: FSP
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
Posts: 2,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
Read the first page of the thread
Lol I did, that's why I'm asking. Looks similar in design and I haven't seen anyone running these with positive feedback.
__________________
Cammed, Slammed and Blown to Perfection

http://www.floridaspeedandpower.com/
Birm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 11:43 AM   #153
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birm View Post
Lol I did, that's why I'm asking. Looks similar in design and I haven't seen anyone running these with positive feedback.

Then what you've read is it isn't spacer in the sense it's simply move the throttle body farther away from the intake manifold. This one's primary purpose to to change the angle of the throttle body to a more advantageous position for the the blade. I've ran spacers in the past to isolate the TB from the heat of a supercharger. This is something different, although the heat isolation thing now has me wondering.

With that said we are waiting for soem more information. I find it interesting though that with a Vararam intake this richens the fueling by 4-5% but not with the behind the headlight intakes. I know it has to do with the limited spacing in relationship to the MAF sensor.
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 11:46 AM   #154
Birm



 
Birm's Avatar
 
Drives: FSP
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
Posts: 2,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
Then what you've read is it isn't spacer in the sense it's simply move the throttle body farther away from the intake manifold. This one's primary purpose to to change the angle of the throttle body to a more advantageous position for the the blade. I've ran spacers in the past to isolate the TB from the heat of a supercharger. This is something different, although the heat isolation thing now has me wondering.
Thanks
__________________
Cammed, Slammed and Blown to Perfection

http://www.floridaspeedandpower.com/
Birm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 11:50 AM   #155
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Birm View Post
Thanks
Welcome. I am skeptical but certainly not discounting anything.
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 12:10 PM   #156
Birm



 
Birm's Avatar
 
Drives: FSP
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
Posts: 2,662
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
Welcome. I am skeptical but certainly not discounting anything.
Yea I agree, I am going to wait for a few reviews from a few others as well as maybe some independent testing.
__________________
Cammed, Slammed and Blown to Perfection

http://www.floridaspeedandpower.com/
Birm is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 12:54 PM   #157
Inferno Orange 2SS-RS
US Army Retired
 
Inferno Orange 2SS-RS's Avatar
 
Drives: IOM 2SS-RS - A6 (L99)
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 546
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
Read the first page of the thread
8 degrees.
__________________
SMKIN SS
2SS/RS L99, LT Headers, High Flow Cats, JRE Custom Tune, JRE Air Scoop, CAI Intake, VMAX CNC Throttle Body, Doug Thorley Catback Exhaust, RX Oil Catch Can, Racing Pedals

13.15-108 mph: Lucas Oil Raceway
Inferno Orange 2SS-RS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 03:46 PM   #158
sales@vararam.com

 
sales@vararam.com's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 camaro
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Houston Tx
Posts: 485
Hey everyone, we are really excited about this product. We know that you may have questions and some of you are just excited to get your hands on it however, we would really like to do this right rather than piece meal answers here and there, so we ask that you please just wait for the webpage and the official rollout. The webpage will answer most of your questions and end any confusion about how or what etc..
We spent over a year on this product, testing On Corvettes, Camaro 's ,GTO's G-8's etc..
Each design was evaluated and run for thousands of miles, bottom line is YES, IT works, it works so well in fact that you guys are going to be stunned by something that appears so simple. It was not simple to design. Get it wrong and you will have a mess.
YES we are guaranteeing a power gain or we will take the part back and pay shipping both ways.
(Spacers in general) We know that the word "spacer" can be a dirty word in the aftermarket. There are a few companies that make them and they tend to find one design that works and then replicate it on every application. A Carb spacer will and does work, but what design and on what applications? Most results will vary and duplicating it on an EFI application it may not work or it may even hurt power.
Every application is different and as such, every design must also change to suite the application. They tend to just re-use the same design over and over again, in applications where it does not belong.
With design of this type of product many have focused on the obvious, the blade itself however, there is a lot more going on inside the aerodynamic package than just tilting the blade to a less restrictive angle of attack. That is only part one.
This will all be explained and shown on the webpage when it goes live.
sales@vararam.com is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 05:16 PM   #159
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by sales@vararam.com View Post
Hey everyone, we are really excited about this product. We know that you may have questions and some of you are just excited to get your hands on it however, we would really like to do this right rather than piece meal answers here and there, so we ask that you please just wait for the webpage and the official rollout. The webpage will answer most of your questions and end any confusion about how or what etc..
We spent over a year on this product, testing On Corvettes, Camaro 's ,GTO's G-8's etc..
Each design was evaluated and run for thousands of miles, bottom line is YES, IT works, it works so well in fact that you guys are going to be stunned by something that appears so simple. It was not simple to design. Get it wrong and you will have a mess.
YES we are guaranteeing a power gain or we will take the part back and pay shipping both ways.
(Spacers in general) We know that the word "spacer" can be a dirty word in the aftermarket. There are a few companies that make them and they tend to find one design that works and then replicate it on every application. A Carb spacer will and does work, but what design and on what applications? Most results will vary and duplicating it on an EFI application it may not work or it may even hurt power.
Every application is different and as such, every design must also change to suite the application. They tend to just re-use the same design over and over again, in applications where it does not belong.
With design of this type of product many have focused on the obvious, the blade itself however, there is a lot more going on inside the aerodynamic package than just tilting the blade to a less restrictive angle of attack. That is only part one.
This will all be explained and shown on the webpage when it goes live.
Toss the dogs a bone. What are we talking here time wise? A week, a month, another year? I'm only asking for those impatient people, not for myself
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 05:21 PM   #160
SC2150



 
SC2150's Avatar
 
Drives: 2001 Camaro SS
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Bradenton, FL
Posts: 8,071
Just real time independant dyno tests is what holds water. We all know the Vararam intakes work great and produce power, but we have tested several other brands that look similar (but not this one) and could not duplicate any claims. Would be good to see it actually produce....would be a good seller.
__________________
www.RevXtreme.com
941-721-1826

Turbo & Supercharging specialist
VMax porting development from the begining
RX Super Chiller
SC2150 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 05:50 PM   #161
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC2150 View Post
Just real time independant dyno tests is what holds water. We all know the Vararam intakes work great and produce power, but we have tested several other brands of "spacers" that look similar (but not this one) and could not duplicate any claims. Would be good to see it actually produce....would be a good seller.
Just sayin
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 06:21 PM   #162
Camarowguy


 
Camarowguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC2150 View Post
Just real time independant dyno tests is what holds water. We all know the Vararam intakes work great and produce power, but we have tested several other brands that look similar (but not this one) and could not duplicate any claims. Would be good to see it actually produce....would be a good seller.
After talking to them today, I'm on board. Money back guarantee also.
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires.
2000 1500 silverado extra cab
Camarowguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 07:03 PM   #163
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarowguy View Post
After talking to them today, I'm on board. Money back guarantee also.
Did Steve give you any idea of when they will be available?
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 07:06 PM   #164
Firerader
 
Drives: 2013 Camaro 2RS/SS 1LE
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Roanoke, Tx
Posts: 97
If the spacer corrects an 8 degree angle on the blade wouldn't that translate to the corrected angle placed on the throttle body itself?
__________________
2013 2SS/RS 1LE.
Firerader is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-11-2012, 07:49 PM   #165
Camarowguy


 
Camarowguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
Did Steve give you any idea of when they will be available?
He said they should be ready to ship Thursday or Friday.
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires.
2000 1500 silverado extra cab
Camarowguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 08:54 AM   #166
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 5,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by Camarowguy View Post
After talking to them today, I'm on board. Money back guarantee also.
But doesn't the spacer require a new tune on cars already running a Vararam intake?

I didn't read the entire thread, but I did read something about cars with Vararam intakes will lose 5-6 hp with the spacer if not tuned.
__________________
SGOS252382 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 08:56 AM   #167
Camarowguy


 
Camarowguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,597
Quote:
Originally Posted by SGOS252382 View Post
But doesn't the spacer require a new tune on cars already running a Vararam intake?

I didn't read the entire thread, but I did read something about cars with Vararam intakes will lose 5-6 hp with the spacer if not tuned.
They won't "lose" that, it just won't make as much difference. He never did mention that in our half hour conversation yesterday tho. He said it made a good noticeable difference on his vette....and I'm assuming he has a vararam intake on it. Why wouldn't he? He works there... Lol

I'm ordering one regardless. My tune is getting revamped anyway, so I'm ok with it.
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires.
2000 1500 silverado extra cab
Camarowguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 09:11 AM   #168
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,849
Steve said this - When installed on a VR equipped Car the spacer will space the MAF closer to the throttle body richening up the Air Fuel by 4-5% . This does cost you some of the total power gain by about 5hp&5-6 ftlbs of Torque. This can obviously be tuned out for max power gains . When used with other cone and pipe style intakes this does not occur so the full power gain is realized without any need to correct the air fuel. Just bolt it on and GO

It's not that you loose power but that you won't gain as much I call that a loss and will retune if need be.
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 09:14 AM   #169
SGOS252382


 
SGOS252382's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS/RS
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: S.W. Florida
Posts: 5,974
Quote:
Originally Posted by IndeedSS1 View Post
Steve said this - When installed on a VR equipped Car the spacer will space the MAF closer to the throttle body richening up the Air Fuel by 4-5% . This does cost you some of the total power gain by about 5hp&5-6 ftlbs of Torque. This can obviously be tuned out for max power gains . When used with other cone and pipe style intakes this does not occur so the full power gain is realized without any need to correct the air fuel. Just bolt it on and GO

It's not that you loose power but that you won't gain as much I call that a loss and will retune if need be.


I would too. You're "richening up the Air Fuel by 4-5%" and not losing power?
Sounds to me like you'd lose power without a tune to get the A/F back to where it needs to be for max power.
__________________
SGOS252382 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 09:19 AM   #170
RacnJsn95

 
RacnJsn95's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 1SS Camaro; 72 Chevelle
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Central Point, OR
Posts: 1,961
Send a message via AIM to RacnJsn95 Send a message via MSN to RacnJsn95
So this piece essentially turns a "No-Tune" Vararam into a "Now you need a tune to see max benefits and you'll get worse gas mileage since the car is running 5-6% richer" Vararam?

For a guy such as myself that will not tune the car until the warranty expires, there doesn't seem to have much merit to buying the spacer w/ a "no-tune" Vararam intake, and I would not buy a "tune" version for the above mentioned reason. IF it makes power with the stock intake, or other tube & box style intakes, it may be worth ones while.
__________________

Specializing in attractive "no drill" front license plate brackets for the 2010+ Camaro
Check out our new website! www.jacfab.com
2010 Camaro 1SS RJT w/ SIM Stripes; M6. 12.535 @ 112.33mph JacFab No-Drill front license plate bracket, Dynomax Axleback, JacFab CAI System, JacFab HFC's, Bo White ported TB., DIY short throw shifter
RacnJsn95 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 09:20 AM   #171
Camarowguy


 
Camarowguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,597
Ok
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires.
2000 1500 silverado extra cab
Camarowguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 09:42 AM   #172
IndeedSS1


 
IndeedSS1's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro SS LS3
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Eastern MO
Posts: 3,849
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacnJsn95 View Post
So this piece essentially turns a "No-Tune" Vararam into a "Now you need a tune to see max benefits and you'll get worse gas mileage since the car is running 5-6% richer" Vararam?

For a guy such as myself that will not tune the car until the warranty expires, there doesn't seem to have much merit to buying the spacer w/ a "no-tune" Vararam intake, and I would not buy a "tune" version for the above mentioned reason. IF it makes power with the stock intake, or other tube & box style intakes, it may be worth ones while.
There is almost nothing, when add-on, that wouldn't benefit from a tune.

Not sure about the worse gas mileage unless you are talking WOT mpg
Wouldn't the flow have to be so far off that the fuel trims couldn't correct it?
__________________


She is only memory now.
IndeedSS1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 09:51 AM   #173
2SSRS
On a list for a 2014 Z28

 
2SSRS's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 Camaro 2SS M6
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: By the lake in AZ
Posts: 10,122
Any one do a dyno on a 2012 with any CAI and if so what did you get for power?
__________________
2SSRS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 01:39 PM   #174
rolnslo
Farewell 2010 1LT/RS...
 
rolnslo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 2SS/RS SGM
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 4,304
Quote:
Originally Posted by RacnJsn95 View Post
So this piece essentially turns a "No-Tune" Vararam into a "Now you need a tune to see max benefits and you'll get worse gas mileage since the car is running 5-6% richer" Vararam?

For a guy such as myself that will not tune the car until the warranty expires, there doesn't seem to have much merit to buying the spacer w/ a "no-tune" Vararam intake, and I would not buy a "tune" version for the above mentioned reason. IF it makes power with the stock intake, or other tube & box style intakes, it may be worth ones while.

Take a look at my gas fill up log below and tell me if you can pick out when I installed the spacer. As I've said before, my car is a daily commuter and my mpgs vary depending on many factors (traffic patterns, ambient temp, idle time, A/C always on this time of year, etc...).

You do not have to have a tune to use this part with a no-tune VR intake. I don't. Any setup can benefit from a tune to get optimal performance and adding this part would be no different. Do you see gains with just a no-tune VR intake? Yes. Would you see better gains by combining it with a tune? Yes. Do you have to tune? No.



Oh, one last thing for everyone...going back to stock sucks!!! No VR intake, no spacer, just the stock intake/filter setup and a fuse pull to reset the fuel trims to stock also. Hit a couple of my favorite freeway onramps over the past 2 days and the car certainly feels like I've lost power. Throttle response is down, WOT acceleration is down (I drive these onramps everyday and know what speed I should be at at certain points)....I'll give it one more day and put the spacer on with the stock intake Wednesday night.
Attached Images
 
__________________

#1: 2010 1LT/RS Victory Red M6 - July 2009-Oct 2011 (SOLD). #2: 2011 2SS/RS Synergy Green A6 - Oct 2011.....
rolnslo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 06-12-2012, 10:37 PM   #175
Camarowguy


 
Camarowguy's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 imperial blue SS, black 92 RS
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Denham Springs
Posts: 2,597
Guess I'll be calling tomorrow and see if they are available yet....
__________________
2011 imperial blue SS/RS a6 12.43@112 vararam, tune, jba cats, magnaflow axle back, self ported tb, under drive pulley, NO headers, Stock tires. 1.87 60ft. Stock tires.
2000 1500 silverado extra cab
Camarowguy is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:14 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.