![]() |
|
|||||||
| Homepage | Garage | Wiki | Register | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
| Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons Bolt-Ons | Intakes | Exhaust |
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
![]() Drives: 2SS/RS M6 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 101
|
Axle Back vs. Catback-SOUND
So ive been looking at exhaust set ups for my Camaro SS. After going back and forth on The Borla ATAK vs The Borla S-type, I think ive decided on the S-type. I am still back and forth on Axleback vs Catback. I know to go with Catback for the LT's down the road. Strictly from a SOUND standpoint, Is there any difference in sound between the Bora S-type Axle back vs the Borla S-type Catback? Ohh and ill be doing a CAI inc Cold air intake too
|
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: FSP Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
Posts: 2,781
|
If you are staying 2.5" then you really don't need to go catback. Not saying don't as a lot do, but it doesn't make enough difference hp wise if you plan on staying 2.5 to justify the cost. That said, you can usually pick up a used system for about the same as an axleback then it's cost effective.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
![]() Drives: 2012 Victory Red SS/RS Join Date: May 2012
Location: Carlisle, KY
Posts: 42
|
My experience with this comes from Corvettes. I assume the answer is the same for Camaros.
The quality of the idle provided by a cat-back system is better than an axle-back system, in my opinion. The stock h-pipe just isn't as good a crossover as the aftermarket x-pipes. An axle-back system tends to have a "motor-boat" idle. My Camaro is an automatic car. I went with a Corsa cat-back. The stock resonator has got to be awfully restrictive. The car's responsiveness tells me it's breathing a lot better. |
|
|
|
|
|
#4 | |
![]() Drives: 2SS/RS M6 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 101
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#5 | ||
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: FSP Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
Posts: 2,781
|
Quote:
First h pipe on the stock system has been proven to be just as efficient as an x pipe and flows roughly the same. JRE and a few other members have tested it side by side to help prove that. That said that X is used more for scavenging at higher flows so idle really isn't affected. And an axleback doesn't have much of a different sound then a catback. The only difference in sounds are the different types of metals used. Lastly, our resonators have been shown to be fairly straight through design, the restrictive part is the cat, not the system behind it. Quote:
X gives a slightly higher pitch/tone, the H gives a lower. Hope it helps.
__________________
|
||
|
|
|
|
|
#6 | |
|
n116
Drives: 2010 2SS YELLOW TRANSFORMER AUTO Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: SAN ANGELO TX
Posts: 613
|
Borla S
Quote:
I have the L99, axleback Borla, CAI Inc and AFM turned off and I love the low growl at normal driving. Give her some gas and the intake and Borla's will wake you up. Happy with my setup. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#7 |
![]() Drives: 2SS/RS M6 Join Date: May 2012
Location: Santa Clarita, CA
Posts: 101
|
Thanks Birm!
|
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: FSP Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Pinellas Park, FL
Posts: 2,781
|
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Drives: 2013 E92 M3 Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 7,314
|
i would go catback. its the idea that you are getting rid of all OEM parts once headers come. just my "style" and view points. and getting rid of resonators gives it a better sound. sure you can go cheaper routes, but to be me. i dont go cheap on my car.
|
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|