Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
River City Camaro Customs
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Mechanical Maintenance: Break-in / Oil & Fluids / Servicing


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 12-11-2012, 11:22 AM   #35
KaBoom1701
KaBoom1701
 
KaBoom1701's Avatar
 
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 6,726
So...........

With all this chatter what is the verdit?

I just bought a 2013 2LT RS V6 and she has only little over 2K miles on her...should I purchase one of these catch cans? I do plan on owning the car for a long time. I think these V6 motors are awesome. The perfect blend of sporty HP and MPG on the market today.
KaBoom1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:38 AM   #36
RollaMo

 
RollaMo's Avatar
 
Drives: 2SS/RS Convertible
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Rolla, MO
Posts: 898
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaBoom1701 View Post
So...........

With all this chatter what is the verdit?
You will never have a verdit, either for or against.
All you will ever get are "opinions" of what someone else has "read someone".

People will post up links to threads all day, both for and against.
But once again, those are just forum opinions.

The COPO Camaro has one, because it is a "Race Car" with a race built engine.
Plus it does not have to meet federal emission laws.

The average Camaro running around on the street probably does not need one, and will happily survive to over 150,000 miles with proper maintenance.
__________________
1996 Corvette - LT4
2011 Camaro SS Convertible
2011 Harley Davidson FLHX Street Glide
RollaMo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:38 AM   #37
DRKS1D3


 
DRKS1D3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Convertible LS3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by SC2150 View Post
Read these threads.....and yes, those not realizing what oil ingestion does can run their car for years and not be aware of the gradual degradation. And no, GM/Ford?Chrusler, etc. probably never will add the expense and another service procedure but the super cars (Maserati, Ferrari, etc.) as well as the Copo all have catchcans as it is performance and longevity for the goal.

Tons of real data, industry info, and automotive engineer data to read on the issues. If nothing else, the small cost for a GOOD functioning one....(most let as much through as they trap) the fuel savings alone pays for the can many times over (detonation from ANY oil ingestion no matter what type fuel delivery causes detonation and the knock sensors command the PCM to pull timing, thus less power is produced and less fuel economy) much less the long term effects. I have been buiulding and rebuilding race & performance engines as well as passenger cars for over 38 years.....if you saw the insides like I and many others do, you would never question the need to separate the oil before it is ingested.

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=216311

http://www.camaro5.com/forums/showthread.php?t=68744
I'm not arguing in any way, shape or form, but when you're buying a $40k car...GM adding a $125 catch can at the factory would be a drop in the bucket.
__________________
MY RIDE: 2011 TRIPLE BLACK SS CONVERTIBLE (BOUGHT NEW 4-2011)--6 SPEED, K&N TYPHOON INTAKE, FLOWMASTER FORCE II EXHAUST, HYPERTECH MAX ENERGY 93 OCTANE TUNE, HOTCHKIS SUSPENSION, BLACKED OUT BOWTIES, GLOSS BLACK 20x9 STYLE 41 WHEELS, JBA HIGH-FLOW CATS

DAD'S RIDE: 2012 ZL1 #1866 (BOUGHT NEW 6-2012)--BLACK, 6 SPEED, EXPOSED CF HOOD, POLISHED WHEELS, SUNROOF, ROTO-FAB INTAKE

"Silly Americans, taking from the rich and giving to the poor only works in fairy tales. Success is earned here!".
DRKS1D3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 11:56 AM   #38
JohnnyBfromPeoria

 
JohnnyBfromPeoria's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 LS M6, Black
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRKS1D3 View Post
GM adding a $125 catch can at the factory would be a drop in the bucket.
Well, they didn't. Question is, will you? Personally, i don't care, I just end up posting after reading so many 'my friend's dad who knows a LOT about engines...' statements.

John B.
JohnnyBfromPeoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:02 PM   #39
Apex Motorsports

 
Apex Motorsports's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Camaro SS
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Louisville, Ky.
Posts: 25,225
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRKS1D3 View Post
I'm not arguing in any way, shape or form, but when you're buying a $40k car...GM adding a $125 catch can at the factory would be a drop in the bucket.
If GM had included a $125 catch can on every 5th Gen Camaros built through the end of the 2011 calender year is would have cost them just over $29 million just for the part alone.
__________________
Apex Motorsports is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:03 PM   #40
KaBoom1701
KaBoom1701
 
KaBoom1701's Avatar
 
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 6,726
I live in Cali.

Will this effect EPA/Smog requirments? I have no idea how to install one but it seems the general idea here is that it dosent hurt and I think everyone agrees that keeping the oil out would be good in the long term..

I own a 92 Camaro and did all the mech work on it myself. I've yet to mess with my new ride but can someone tell me how difficult/easy it is to install one of these catch cans? I imagine I'll need to remove it if I ever need to do a warrenty claim?

Thx
KaBoom1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:03 PM   #41
dkp2LT


 
dkp2LT's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 2LT/RS, '13 GT/CS, '10 Flex
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Kansas City, MO & Del Mar, CA
Posts: 2,480
Catch cans, type of oil to use, how often to change oil, seafoam is great/it sucks etc. - there will never be 100% agreement. Absorb the info & decide the best route for yourself.
dkp2LT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:05 PM   #42
VQ35DE
 
Drives: 2013 / 2SS / RS / L99
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Tennessee
Posts: 450
Quote:
Originally Posted by DRKS1D3 View Post
I'm not arguing in any way, shape or form, but when you're buying a $40k car...GM adding a $125 catch can at the factory would be a drop in the bucket.

True but the average driver is too dumb and lazy to empty it.
VQ35DE is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:14 PM   #43
JOHNSONROD
 
JOHNSONROD's Avatar
 
Drives: 62 chevy & 2011 1SS/RS manual
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Kentucky
Posts: 582
if you make lots of wide open pulls, you should get one. if you only street drive, you dont have to get one but it wouldnt hurt.
i clean mine out at every oil change and before and after each track event. the guys that arent seeing any oil in their can are not driving them at WFO enough to build pressure to cause blowby.
those thinking gm has their best interest at heart, and would put everything the car could possibly need for every driver in, are not thinking rationally or are inexperienced(like we all were once). if your going to drive a passanger car thats built for the masses, you will have to do the things that make the car last in those conditions. drag race guys add a stall and trans tune. guys who road track work on the suspension.
JOHNSONROD is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:17 PM   #44
JohnnyBfromPeoria

 
JohnnyBfromPeoria's Avatar
 
Drives: 2012 LS M6, Black
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 2,041
Quote:
Originally Posted by KaBoom1701 View Post
I live in Cali.

Will this effect EPA/Smog requirments? Probably won't have any effect. It certainly wouldn't make it worse, and could make emissions cleaner, I don't know.

can someone tell me how difficult/easy it is to install Easy. Really easy.
John B.
JohnnyBfromPeoria is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:30 PM   #45
RBL
 
Drives: 2010 camaro 2SS
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: WV
Posts: 401
If you care about your engines performance as it ages you will run a catch can, if you do not care about its performance then no need to run a catch can.
RBL is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:30 PM   #46
DRKS1D3


 
DRKS1D3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Convertible LS3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by JohnnyBfromPeoria View Post
Well, they didn't. Question is, will you? Personally, i don't care, I just end up posting after reading so many 'my friend's dad who knows a LOT about engines...' statements.

John B.
Pretty argumentative aren't ya? I came in here looking for answers and to have polite conversation. Sorry I struck a nerve. There are others here that have said they're absolutely F*CKING worthless. Go jump their nuts instead. I never claimed my Dad or his friends were the next coming of John Force. All I said was they were "big car guys". Having owned and maintained just about every American Muscle since the 60's. Anyways...can we continue with the debate/information?
__________________
MY RIDE: 2011 TRIPLE BLACK SS CONVERTIBLE (BOUGHT NEW 4-2011)--6 SPEED, K&N TYPHOON INTAKE, FLOWMASTER FORCE II EXHAUST, HYPERTECH MAX ENERGY 93 OCTANE TUNE, HOTCHKIS SUSPENSION, BLACKED OUT BOWTIES, GLOSS BLACK 20x9 STYLE 41 WHEELS, JBA HIGH-FLOW CATS

DAD'S RIDE: 2012 ZL1 #1866 (BOUGHT NEW 6-2012)--BLACK, 6 SPEED, EXPOSED CF HOOD, POLISHED WHEELS, SUNROOF, ROTO-FAB INTAKE

"Silly Americans, taking from the rich and giving to the poor only works in fairy tales. Success is earned here!".
DRKS1D3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:34 PM   #47
babytiger
it's hers...
 
babytiger's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro 2SS/RS Convertible
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: katy, tx
Posts: 1,202
Quote:
Originally Posted by RBL View Post
If you care about your engines performance as it ages you will run a catch can, if you do not care about its performance then no need to run a catch can.
I don't see where a catch can is a performance item. Now if the Camaro has 200,000 miles on it and has never had the throttle body cleaned etc, then a catch can could have lessened some of that. But a catch can would in no way effect performance of a daily driver.
babytiger is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:34 PM   #48
DRKS1D3


 
DRKS1D3's Avatar
 
Drives: 2011 Camaro SS Convertible LS3
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Pennsylvania
Posts: 2,288
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex Chase View Post
If GM had included a $125 catch can on every 5th Gen Camaros built through the end of the 2011 calender year is would have cost them just over $29 million just for the part alone.
Ok, if it's so imperative, then why not include the catch can and omit something that is purely cosmetic to make up the difference? Just a thought.
__________________
MY RIDE: 2011 TRIPLE BLACK SS CONVERTIBLE (BOUGHT NEW 4-2011)--6 SPEED, K&N TYPHOON INTAKE, FLOWMASTER FORCE II EXHAUST, HYPERTECH MAX ENERGY 93 OCTANE TUNE, HOTCHKIS SUSPENSION, BLACKED OUT BOWTIES, GLOSS BLACK 20x9 STYLE 41 WHEELS, JBA HIGH-FLOW CATS

DAD'S RIDE: 2012 ZL1 #1866 (BOUGHT NEW 6-2012)--BLACK, 6 SPEED, EXPOSED CF HOOD, POLISHED WHEELS, SUNROOF, ROTO-FAB INTAKE

"Silly Americans, taking from the rich and giving to the poor only works in fairy tales. Success is earned here!".
DRKS1D3 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:45 PM   #49
KaBoom1701
KaBoom1701
 
KaBoom1701's Avatar
 
Drives: 13' ZL1 Red M6
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: I.E. SoCal (Yucaipa)
Posts: 6,726
Well I think most of these cars are considered street legal daily drivers so GM considers the cost vs. benefit ratio acceptable. Since it appears there is very little oil leakage the added expense is not justified to have a catch can install from the factory.

I think most of us here at Camaro5 are "hyper" sensitive about our cars performance and maintenance so we tend to error on the side of caution and install these "small but useful" add on parts.

Just my 2 cents...
KaBoom1701 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 12:49 PM   #50
bumblebeecamaro
Car Lover By Nature
 
Drives: Mini Cooper S
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Central FL
Posts: 2,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Apex Chase View Post
If GM had included a $125 catch can on every 5th Gen Camaros built through the end of the 2011 calender year is would have cost them just over $29 million just for the part alone.
$125 for an OCC is retail. there's no way GM would ever pay that much per unit if/when they included them on our cars. I'd say maybe $20 or near there. definitely not $125.

but as for my car? we put my Maggie 2300 on my car with only 300 miles. I could not believe how much oil was inside my intake with only 300 miles on the engine. that was reason alone for me to get a catch can.
__________________
bumblebeecamaro is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12-11-2012, 01:32 PM   #51
Wvlsxjunkie
^ Has LSX addiction
 
Wvlsxjunkie's Avatar
 
Drives: 2010 L99 SS
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Southern West Virginia
Posts: 72
Run one.
I own three lsx powered vehicles and they all have one.
Its debatable, but I choose to run one for peace of mind.

Brad
8yrs as GM technician.
__________________
2010 1SS
Minor mods
Wvlsxjunkie is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:31 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.