Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com
 
autoguy
Go Back   Camaro5 Chevy Camaro Forum / Camaro ZL1, SS and V6 Forums - Camaro5.com > Engine | Drivetrain | Powertrain Technical Discussions > Camaro V8 LS3 / L99 Engine, Exhaust, and Bolt-Ons


Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 02-05-2008, 11:14 AM   #1
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,052
How much is not enough?

Is there a minimum horsepower/torque requirement for this car to be ideal for you? Will this be a factor for your purchase? How much would you pay for this power?

I must admit, power will be a big factor for me in purchasing this car. I am hoping to be in a position to be able to afford the top-dog model, regardless of being an SS or Z28 (although I am partial to Z28 .) Regardless, I think it would be great to see between 450 and 500 horse, but I'm not sure how practical it is, given all the speculation regarding CAFE and whatnot. I'm not saying I wouldn't purchase the car if it had less, but I would admit in being a little disappointed. I think that something reasonable would be a range of what the Shelby is priced at.

What do you think?
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 11:23 AM   #2
MattG
Z/28 or Bust!
 
Drives: First Camaro: '69 Z28
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 107
I'm planning to get a v8 model, but probably not the 'Top Dog' (whichever model that is... although I'm also partial to a Z/28 ). Anything less than about 375hp would be disappointing, and anything below 350hp might be a dealbreaker.
MattG is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 11:58 AM   #3
Cubanaso
Follower of CHRIST!
 
Cubanaso's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Mazda RX8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 299
Depends on how much this baby weighs. You can get 450-500HP but if the car weighs 4000 punds (wink wink GT500) you might get good performance but in my opinion that is a waste of ALOT of HP.

My dream, is that they build the Camaro and keep it under 3500 pounds and with that weight I'd be happy with 350HP to be honest (for the Z28 version). With that said, since the G8 has about 363HP I guesstamate the new Camaro will come in with 370HP for the V8 version. The V6 maybe 270HP and the top dog SS 450-500HP. You know they will aim to beat the V6, GT, and GT500 Mustang so use that as your ruler.

Thinking about it, as long as they match the Mustang GT (which is enough performance for me, and I can tinker for more later) performance I'd be happy. So again, what ever weight to power ratio that comes to I'd be fine.
__________________
A GM V8 in every home....
Cubanaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 11:59 AM   #4
'09-Z28
 
'09-Z28's Avatar
 
Drives: '03 Mazda 6s
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Phoenix, AZ
Posts: 35
Quote:
Originally Posted by MattG View Post
I'm planning to get a v8 model, but probably not the 'Top Dog' (whichever model that is... although I'm also partial to a Z/28 ). Anything less than about 375hp would be disappointing, and anything below 350hp might be a dealbreaker.
'09-Z28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 12:01 PM   #5
joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010
Z28 Hold Out!
 
joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010's Avatar
 
Drives: 2000 Monte Carlo SS
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Wichita, Ks.
Posts: 354
Top dog for my money no less than 420 on both trq. and hp.. If they happen to supercharge it I need it to be above 525 hp. and trq could be a little less.
joes3rdcamaro82/91/2010 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 12:31 PM   #6
Mr. Wyndham
I used to be Dragoneye...
 
Mr. Wyndham's Avatar
 
Drives: 2014 Camaro 1LE
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Buffalo, NY
Posts: 26,352
Send a message via AIM to Mr. Wyndham
It has to perform better than the 4th gen. Not by much - but there has to be a noticeable difference. Other than that, I couldn't care less how much hp/torque it has. So long as the performance is there, I'm all set.
(Oh, I'm not looking for this "Top Dog" either. A normal, everyday V8 would be fine.)
__________________
"Keep the faith." - - Read Before You Post.

Mr. Wyndham is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 01:14 PM   #7
TheMadHatter99
Kept the Faith
 
TheMadHatter99's Avatar
 
Drives: '10 Camaro 2SS/RS CGM
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 722
I want the standard V8 and I'm hoping for around 400. 350 or below would be a huge huge let-down.
__________________
TheMadHatter99 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 01:45 PM   #8
killerdiller
 
killerdiller's Avatar
 
Drives: 1980 z-28,1969 ss,08 g35s 6mt
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: columbus ohio
Posts: 17
I think that 500 hp is a good round number,and it wouldnt be stepping on anybodys toes..(z06=505,zr1=620,cts-v=550,)
killerdiller is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 02:15 PM   #9
Jay
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Drives: Audi A4
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Van City, Canada
Posts: 429
Looking to get the base V8 engine model..... I would want it to be close to 400HP.... BUT, like everyone else said.... the minimum for me would be 350....and I have no doubt that with the Mustang GT bulitt pushing close to i think it is 330 (dont quote me).... that the Camaro will push atleast 360-380.... with weight around 3400-3700 pounds.... which for me is good to go....

if it doesnt... then well if I really like how it looks asthetically will decide for me whether I get the car or not.... if not, back to the Audi's it is for me, lol!
__________________

"HEAVEN JUST COULDN'T HANDLE ALL THE NOISE"
JAY
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 02:18 PM   #10
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,052
I bring this up because I'm a little resentful in that the 4th Gen. was underated so much (not that that was a bad thing.) Considering the "310" horsepower from a Z28, a lot of the cars were putting 310 to the wheels on the dyno. With a lid, catback, MACs, and crappy "canned tune," my car was putting down 334 at the wheels. With LTs and a dyno tune, I got 360+ wheel power. That amounts to dang near 400 flywheel horsepower, which is what the LS2 was rated at. My point is, that I think that the way GM reported LS1 power was grossly underrated and that I suspect that isn't going to be the case (for whatever reason.) Considering this, if my LS1, with bolt-ons, makes near 400 flywheel horsepower, I would think a Gen IV or Gen V engine should easily make 10-20% more power (albeit stock.) Since these engines are going to be more efficient, I would expect we get more power.

I guess I just have high expectations.
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 02:35 PM   #11
Cubanaso
Follower of CHRIST!
 
Cubanaso's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Mazda RX8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 299
Quote:
if it doesnt... then well if I really like how it looks asthetically will decide for me whether I get the car or not.... if not, back to the Audi's it is for me, lol!
Either way...you are in good company, MAN I LOVE THAT LITTLE A4!!! LOL
__________________
A GM V8 in every home....
Cubanaso is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 02:51 PM   #12
Jay
 
Jay's Avatar
 
Drives: Audi A4
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Van City, Canada
Posts: 429
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cubanaso View Post
Either way...you are in good company, MAN I LOVE THAT LITTLE A4!!! LOL
yah its a nice car.... i got my eyes set on the new A5/S5 if i dont get the Camaro... given I will have to save more and finance.... but im okay with that, lol.
__________________

"HEAVEN JUST COULDN'T HANDLE ALL THE NOISE"
JAY
Jay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 03:17 PM   #13
stovt001


 
stovt001's Avatar
 
Drives: 2006 Cobalt, 2004 Taurus wagon
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: California
Posts: 3,816
peak power numbers are almost irrelevant because they don't take into account weight, power curves, traction, gearing, etc. So my minimum numbers are real performance. I'm looking for at least low 5 seconds 0-60, preferably in the 4s and low 12s in the quarter. Handling is also harder to objectively measure so I'll just have to read the reviews and see what they say.
stovt001 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 03:25 PM   #14
VTXrider

 
VTXrider's Avatar
 
Drives: RY 2SS/RS
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Miami
Posts: 795
I think 400 is starting to become common place. GM knowsw most people are just looking at HP not weight or the HP/Weight ratio so I think GM will want to have 400 HP in the main V8 version, not the limeted production GT500 killer
VTXrider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 03:41 PM   #15
big_bank5000
Bring it back!!!!!
 
big_bank5000's Avatar
 
Drives: 2008 G8 GT (its my baby)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Detroit, MI
Posts: 51
I think the camaro will debute with a 420+ hp engine. If you remember bob lutz said "we have the zo6 engine waiting in the back if needed" with that said the zo6 is producing 500hp which i think will come out as a Z/28 model. And the SS model will be the 420+hp model. thats my theory on it b/c if dodge release a challenger with 425hp i know chevy has to always out due its competiors **hint hint** zo6 beats viper. viper comes out with a faster version....now the ZR-1 hmmmmm. In conclusion Camaro debutes with a 420+hp engine in my point of view
__________________
Chevy till the day I'm six feet under!!! 2009 grab your horses I got mines you better get yours. (R.I.P Steve Godbless)
big_bank5000 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 04:03 PM   #16
radz28
Petro-sexual
 
radz28's Avatar
 
Drives: Ultra-Grin
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Crapramento, Crapifornia
Posts: 13,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by stovt001 View Post
peak power numbers are almost irrelevant because they don't take into account weight, power curves, traction, gearing, etc. So my minimum numbers are real performance. I'm looking for at least low 5 seconds 0-60, preferably in the 4s and low 12s in the quarter. Handling is also harder to objectively measure so I'll just have to read the reviews and see what they say.
I agree; I didn't make myself too clear. I was assuming the car to be close to the weight of a Shelby. My bad.
__________________
"...What IS true: We anticipated that this would happen - we are never finished - and yes, Ford DOES deserve to win now and then. To think that GM can come out with a car to make ford throw in the towel is simply foolhardy..." - fbodfather
radz28 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 02-05-2008, 05:10 PM   #17
Cubanaso
Follower of CHRIST!
 
Cubanaso's Avatar
 
Drives: 2005 Mazda RX8
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Central FL
Posts: 299
Quote:
yah its a nice car.... i got my eyes set on the new A5/S5 if i dont get the Camaro... given I will have to save more and finance.... but im okay with that, lol.
Yeah, the A5 is also super nice...Audi in general just kicks butt with looks and interior's also. But, the one car that disappoints a bit is the A6.




On topic, exactly like I said...weight to power is what matters and high 300's up to low 500 is most likely what we will see for V8 versions.
__________________
A GM V8 in every home....
Cubanaso is offline   Reply With Quote
 
Reply

Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:16 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.9 Beta 4
Copyright ©2000 - 2016, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.